Cargando…

Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales

BACKGROUND: Despite a plethora of studies examining the effect of increased urbanisation on health, no single study has systematically examined the measurement properties of scales used to measure urbanicity. It is critical to distinguish findings from studies that use surrogate measures of urbanici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cyril, Sheila, Oldroyd, John C, Renzaho, Andre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23714282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-513
_version_ 1782272054894002176
author Cyril, Sheila
Oldroyd, John C
Renzaho, Andre
author_facet Cyril, Sheila
Oldroyd, John C
Renzaho, Andre
author_sort Cyril, Sheila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite a plethora of studies examining the effect of increased urbanisation on health, no single study has systematically examined the measurement properties of scales used to measure urbanicity. It is critical to distinguish findings from studies that use surrogate measures of urbanicity (e.g. population density) from those that use measures rigorously tested for reliability and validity. The purpose of this study was to assess the measurement reliability and validity of the available urbanicity scales and identify areas where more research is needed to facilitate the development of a standardised measure of urbanicity. METHODS: Databases searched were MEDLINE with Full Text, CINAHL with Full Text, and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) as well as Embase (Ovid) covering the period from January 1970 to April 2012. Studies included in this systematic review were those that focused on the development of an urbanicity scale with clearly defined items or the adoption of an existing scale, included at least one outcome measure related to health, published in peer-reviewed journals, the full text was available in English and tested for validity and reliability. RESULTS: Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria which were conducted in Sri Lanka, Austria, China, Nigeria, India and Philippines. They ranged in size from 3327 to 33,404 participants. The number of scale items ranged from 7 to 12 items in 5 studies. One study measured urban area socioeconomic disadvantage instead of urbanicity. The emerging evidence is that increased urbanisation is associated with deleterious health outcomes. It is possible that increased urbanisation is also associated with access and utilisation of health services. However, urbanicity measures differed across studies, and the reliability and validity properties of the used scales were not well established. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for studies to standardise measures of urbanicity. Longitudinal cohort studies to confirm the relationship between increased urbanisation and health outcomes are urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3671972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36719722013-06-05 Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales Cyril, Sheila Oldroyd, John C Renzaho, Andre BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite a plethora of studies examining the effect of increased urbanisation on health, no single study has systematically examined the measurement properties of scales used to measure urbanicity. It is critical to distinguish findings from studies that use surrogate measures of urbanicity (e.g. population density) from those that use measures rigorously tested for reliability and validity. The purpose of this study was to assess the measurement reliability and validity of the available urbanicity scales and identify areas where more research is needed to facilitate the development of a standardised measure of urbanicity. METHODS: Databases searched were MEDLINE with Full Text, CINAHL with Full Text, and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) as well as Embase (Ovid) covering the period from January 1970 to April 2012. Studies included in this systematic review were those that focused on the development of an urbanicity scale with clearly defined items or the adoption of an existing scale, included at least one outcome measure related to health, published in peer-reviewed journals, the full text was available in English and tested for validity and reliability. RESULTS: Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria which were conducted in Sri Lanka, Austria, China, Nigeria, India and Philippines. They ranged in size from 3327 to 33,404 participants. The number of scale items ranged from 7 to 12 items in 5 studies. One study measured urban area socioeconomic disadvantage instead of urbanicity. The emerging evidence is that increased urbanisation is associated with deleterious health outcomes. It is possible that increased urbanisation is also associated with access and utilisation of health services. However, urbanicity measures differed across studies, and the reliability and validity properties of the used scales were not well established. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for studies to standardise measures of urbanicity. Longitudinal cohort studies to confirm the relationship between increased urbanisation and health outcomes are urgently needed. BioMed Central 2013-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3671972/ /pubmed/23714282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-513 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cyril et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cyril, Sheila
Oldroyd, John C
Renzaho, Andre
Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales
title Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales
title_full Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales
title_fullStr Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales
title_full_unstemmed Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales
title_short Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales
title_sort urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23714282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-513
work_keys_str_mv AT cyrilsheila urbanisationurbanicityandhealthasystematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofurbanicityscales
AT oldroydjohnc urbanisationurbanicityandhealthasystematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofurbanicityscales
AT renzahoandre urbanisationurbanicityandhealthasystematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofurbanicityscales