Cargando…
Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape
BACKGROUND: A classification image (CI) technique has shown that static luminance noise near visually completed contours affects the discrimination of fat and thin Kanizsa shapes. These influential noise regions were proposed to reveal “behavioral receptive fields” of completed contours–the same reg...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062505 |
_version_ | 1782272070350012416 |
---|---|
author | Keane, Brian P. Lu, Hongjing Papathomas, Thomas V. Silverstein, Steven M. Kellman, Philip J. |
author_facet | Keane, Brian P. Lu, Hongjing Papathomas, Thomas V. Silverstein, Steven M. Kellman, Philip J. |
author_sort | Keane, Brian P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A classification image (CI) technique has shown that static luminance noise near visually completed contours affects the discrimination of fat and thin Kanizsa shapes. These influential noise regions were proposed to reveal “behavioral receptive fields” of completed contours–the same regions to which early cortical cells respond in neurophysiological studies of contour completion. Here, we hypothesized that 1) influential noise regions correspond to the surfaces that distinguish fat and thin shapes (hereafter, key regions); and 2) key region noise biases a “fat” response to the extent that its contrast polarity (lighter or darker than background) matches the shape's filled-in surface color. RESULTS: To test our hypothesis, we had observers discriminate fat and thin noise-embedded rectangles that were defined by either illusory or luminance-defined contours (Experiment 1). Surrounding elements (“inducers”) caused the shapes to appear either lighter or darker than the background–a process sometimes referred to as lightness induction. For both illusory and luminance-defined rectangles, key region noise biased a fat response to the extent that its contrast polarity (light or dark) matched the induced surface color. When lightness induction was minimized, luminance noise had no consistent influence on shape discrimination. This pattern arose when pixels immediately adjacent to the discriminated boundaries were excluded from the analysis (Experiment 2) and also when the noise was restricted to the key regions so that the noise never overlapped with the physically visible edges (Experiment 3). The lightness effects did not occur in the absence of enclosing boundaries (Experiment 4). CONCLUSIONS: Under noisy conditions, lightness induction alters visually completed shape. Moreover, behavioral receptive fields derived in CI studies do not correspond to contours per se but to filled-in surface regions contained by those contours. The relevance of lightness to two-dimensional shape completion supplies a new constraint for models of object perception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3672097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36720972013-06-07 Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape Keane, Brian P. Lu, Hongjing Papathomas, Thomas V. Silverstein, Steven M. Kellman, Philip J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A classification image (CI) technique has shown that static luminance noise near visually completed contours affects the discrimination of fat and thin Kanizsa shapes. These influential noise regions were proposed to reveal “behavioral receptive fields” of completed contours–the same regions to which early cortical cells respond in neurophysiological studies of contour completion. Here, we hypothesized that 1) influential noise regions correspond to the surfaces that distinguish fat and thin shapes (hereafter, key regions); and 2) key region noise biases a “fat” response to the extent that its contrast polarity (lighter or darker than background) matches the shape's filled-in surface color. RESULTS: To test our hypothesis, we had observers discriminate fat and thin noise-embedded rectangles that were defined by either illusory or luminance-defined contours (Experiment 1). Surrounding elements (“inducers”) caused the shapes to appear either lighter or darker than the background–a process sometimes referred to as lightness induction. For both illusory and luminance-defined rectangles, key region noise biased a fat response to the extent that its contrast polarity (light or dark) matched the induced surface color. When lightness induction was minimized, luminance noise had no consistent influence on shape discrimination. This pattern arose when pixels immediately adjacent to the discriminated boundaries were excluded from the analysis (Experiment 2) and also when the noise was restricted to the key regions so that the noise never overlapped with the physically visible edges (Experiment 3). The lightness effects did not occur in the absence of enclosing boundaries (Experiment 4). CONCLUSIONS: Under noisy conditions, lightness induction alters visually completed shape. Moreover, behavioral receptive fields derived in CI studies do not correspond to contours per se but to filled-in surface regions contained by those contours. The relevance of lightness to two-dimensional shape completion supplies a new constraint for models of object perception. Public Library of Science 2013-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3672097/ /pubmed/23750200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062505 Text en © 2013 Keane et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Keane, Brian P. Lu, Hongjing Papathomas, Thomas V. Silverstein, Steven M. Kellman, Philip J. Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape |
title | Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape |
title_full | Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape |
title_fullStr | Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape |
title_full_unstemmed | Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape |
title_short | Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape |
title_sort | reinterpreting behavioral receptive fields: lightness induction alters visually completed shape |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keanebrianp reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape AT luhongjing reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape AT papathomasthomasv reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape AT silversteinstevenm reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape AT kellmanphilipj reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape |