Cargando…

Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape

BACKGROUND: A classification image (CI) technique has shown that static luminance noise near visually completed contours affects the discrimination of fat and thin Kanizsa shapes. These influential noise regions were proposed to reveal “behavioral receptive fields” of completed contours–the same reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keane, Brian P., Lu, Hongjing, Papathomas, Thomas V., Silverstein, Steven M., Kellman, Philip J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062505
_version_ 1782272070350012416
author Keane, Brian P.
Lu, Hongjing
Papathomas, Thomas V.
Silverstein, Steven M.
Kellman, Philip J.
author_facet Keane, Brian P.
Lu, Hongjing
Papathomas, Thomas V.
Silverstein, Steven M.
Kellman, Philip J.
author_sort Keane, Brian P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A classification image (CI) technique has shown that static luminance noise near visually completed contours affects the discrimination of fat and thin Kanizsa shapes. These influential noise regions were proposed to reveal “behavioral receptive fields” of completed contours–the same regions to which early cortical cells respond in neurophysiological studies of contour completion. Here, we hypothesized that 1) influential noise regions correspond to the surfaces that distinguish fat and thin shapes (hereafter, key regions); and 2) key region noise biases a “fat” response to the extent that its contrast polarity (lighter or darker than background) matches the shape's filled-in surface color. RESULTS: To test our hypothesis, we had observers discriminate fat and thin noise-embedded rectangles that were defined by either illusory or luminance-defined contours (Experiment 1). Surrounding elements (“inducers”) caused the shapes to appear either lighter or darker than the background–a process sometimes referred to as lightness induction. For both illusory and luminance-defined rectangles, key region noise biased a fat response to the extent that its contrast polarity (light or dark) matched the induced surface color. When lightness induction was minimized, luminance noise had no consistent influence on shape discrimination. This pattern arose when pixels immediately adjacent to the discriminated boundaries were excluded from the analysis (Experiment 2) and also when the noise was restricted to the key regions so that the noise never overlapped with the physically visible edges (Experiment 3). The lightness effects did not occur in the absence of enclosing boundaries (Experiment 4). CONCLUSIONS: Under noisy conditions, lightness induction alters visually completed shape. Moreover, behavioral receptive fields derived in CI studies do not correspond to contours per se but to filled-in surface regions contained by those contours. The relevance of lightness to two-dimensional shape completion supplies a new constraint for models of object perception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3672097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36720972013-06-07 Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape Keane, Brian P. Lu, Hongjing Papathomas, Thomas V. Silverstein, Steven M. Kellman, Philip J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A classification image (CI) technique has shown that static luminance noise near visually completed contours affects the discrimination of fat and thin Kanizsa shapes. These influential noise regions were proposed to reveal “behavioral receptive fields” of completed contours–the same regions to which early cortical cells respond in neurophysiological studies of contour completion. Here, we hypothesized that 1) influential noise regions correspond to the surfaces that distinguish fat and thin shapes (hereafter, key regions); and 2) key region noise biases a “fat” response to the extent that its contrast polarity (lighter or darker than background) matches the shape's filled-in surface color. RESULTS: To test our hypothesis, we had observers discriminate fat and thin noise-embedded rectangles that were defined by either illusory or luminance-defined contours (Experiment 1). Surrounding elements (“inducers”) caused the shapes to appear either lighter or darker than the background–a process sometimes referred to as lightness induction. For both illusory and luminance-defined rectangles, key region noise biased a fat response to the extent that its contrast polarity (light or dark) matched the induced surface color. When lightness induction was minimized, luminance noise had no consistent influence on shape discrimination. This pattern arose when pixels immediately adjacent to the discriminated boundaries were excluded from the analysis (Experiment 2) and also when the noise was restricted to the key regions so that the noise never overlapped with the physically visible edges (Experiment 3). The lightness effects did not occur in the absence of enclosing boundaries (Experiment 4). CONCLUSIONS: Under noisy conditions, lightness induction alters visually completed shape. Moreover, behavioral receptive fields derived in CI studies do not correspond to contours per se but to filled-in surface regions contained by those contours. The relevance of lightness to two-dimensional shape completion supplies a new constraint for models of object perception. Public Library of Science 2013-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3672097/ /pubmed/23750200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062505 Text en © 2013 Keane et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Keane, Brian P.
Lu, Hongjing
Papathomas, Thomas V.
Silverstein, Steven M.
Kellman, Philip J.
Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape
title Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape
title_full Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape
title_fullStr Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape
title_full_unstemmed Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape
title_short Reinterpreting Behavioral Receptive Fields: Lightness Induction Alters Visually Completed Shape
title_sort reinterpreting behavioral receptive fields: lightness induction alters visually completed shape
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062505
work_keys_str_mv AT keanebrianp reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape
AT luhongjing reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape
AT papathomasthomasv reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape
AT silversteinstevenm reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape
AT kellmanphilipj reinterpretingbehavioralreceptivefieldslightnessinductionaltersvisuallycompletedshape