Cargando…
Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis
BACKGROUND: Drug manufacturers have developed “evergreening” strategies to compete with generic medication after patent termination. These include marketing of slightly modified follow-on drugs. We aimed to estimate the financial impact of these drugs on overall healthcare costs and also to examine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001460 |
_version_ | 1782272097292124160 |
---|---|
author | Vernaz, Nathalie Haller, Guy Girardin, François Huttner, Benedikt Combescure, Christophe Dayer, Pierre Muscionico, Daniel Salomon, Jean-Luc Bonnabry, Pascal |
author_facet | Vernaz, Nathalie Haller, Guy Girardin, François Huttner, Benedikt Combescure, Christophe Dayer, Pierre Muscionico, Daniel Salomon, Jean-Luc Bonnabry, Pascal |
author_sort | Vernaz, Nathalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Drug manufacturers have developed “evergreening” strategies to compete with generic medication after patent termination. These include marketing of slightly modified follow-on drugs. We aimed to estimate the financial impact of these drugs on overall healthcare costs and also to examine the impact of listing these drugs in hospital restrictive drug formularies (RDFs) on the healthcare system as a whole (“spillover effect”). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used hospital and community pharmacy invoice office data in the Swiss canton of Geneva to calculate utilisation of eight follow-on drugs in defined daily doses between 2000 and 2008. “Extra costs” were calculated for three different scenarios assuming replacement with the corresponding generic equivalent for prescriptions of (1) all brand (i.e., initially patented) drugs, (2) all follow-on drugs, or (3) brand and follow-on drugs. To examine the financial spillover effect we calculated a monthly follow-on drug market share in defined daily doses for medications prescribed by hospital physicians but dispensed in community pharmacies, in comparison to drugs prescribed by non-hospital physicians in the community. Estimated “extra costs” over the study period were €15.9 (95% CI 15.5; 16.2) million for scenario 1, €14.4 (95% CI 14.1; 14.7) million for scenario 2, and €30.3 (95% CI 29.8; 30.8) million for scenario 3. The impact of strictly switching all patients using proton-pump inhibitors to esomeprazole at admission resulted in a spillover “extra cost” of €330,300 (95% CI 276,100; 383,800), whereas strictly switching to generic cetirizine resulted in savings of €7,700 (95% CI 4,100; 11,100). Overall we estimated that the RDF resulted in “extra costs” of €503,600 (95% CI 444,500; 563,100). CONCLUSIONS: Evergreening strategies have been successful in maintaining market share in Geneva, offsetting competition by generics and cost containment policies. Hospitals may be contributing to increased overall healthcare costs by listing follow-on drugs in their RDF. Therefore, healthcare providers and policy makers should be aware of the impact of evergreening strategies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3672218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36722182013-06-07 Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis Vernaz, Nathalie Haller, Guy Girardin, François Huttner, Benedikt Combescure, Christophe Dayer, Pierre Muscionico, Daniel Salomon, Jean-Luc Bonnabry, Pascal PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Drug manufacturers have developed “evergreening” strategies to compete with generic medication after patent termination. These include marketing of slightly modified follow-on drugs. We aimed to estimate the financial impact of these drugs on overall healthcare costs and also to examine the impact of listing these drugs in hospital restrictive drug formularies (RDFs) on the healthcare system as a whole (“spillover effect”). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used hospital and community pharmacy invoice office data in the Swiss canton of Geneva to calculate utilisation of eight follow-on drugs in defined daily doses between 2000 and 2008. “Extra costs” were calculated for three different scenarios assuming replacement with the corresponding generic equivalent for prescriptions of (1) all brand (i.e., initially patented) drugs, (2) all follow-on drugs, or (3) brand and follow-on drugs. To examine the financial spillover effect we calculated a monthly follow-on drug market share in defined daily doses for medications prescribed by hospital physicians but dispensed in community pharmacies, in comparison to drugs prescribed by non-hospital physicians in the community. Estimated “extra costs” over the study period were €15.9 (95% CI 15.5; 16.2) million for scenario 1, €14.4 (95% CI 14.1; 14.7) million for scenario 2, and €30.3 (95% CI 29.8; 30.8) million for scenario 3. The impact of strictly switching all patients using proton-pump inhibitors to esomeprazole at admission resulted in a spillover “extra cost” of €330,300 (95% CI 276,100; 383,800), whereas strictly switching to generic cetirizine resulted in savings of €7,700 (95% CI 4,100; 11,100). Overall we estimated that the RDF resulted in “extra costs” of €503,600 (95% CI 444,500; 563,100). CONCLUSIONS: Evergreening strategies have been successful in maintaining market share in Geneva, offsetting competition by generics and cost containment policies. Hospitals may be contributing to increased overall healthcare costs by listing follow-on drugs in their RDF. Therefore, healthcare providers and policy makers should be aware of the impact of evergreening strategies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2013-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3672218/ /pubmed/23750120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001460 Text en © 2013 Vernaz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vernaz, Nathalie Haller, Guy Girardin, François Huttner, Benedikt Combescure, Christophe Dayer, Pierre Muscionico, Daniel Salomon, Jean-Luc Bonnabry, Pascal Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis |
title | Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis |
title_full | Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis |
title_fullStr | Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis |
title_short | Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis |
title_sort | patented drug extension strategies on healthcare spending: a cost-evaluation analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001460 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vernaznathalie patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis AT hallerguy patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis AT girardinfrancois patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis AT huttnerbenedikt patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis AT combescurechristophe patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis AT dayerpierre patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis AT muscionicodaniel patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis AT salomonjeanluc patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis AT bonnabrypascal patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis |