Cargando…

Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis

BACKGROUND: Drug manufacturers have developed “evergreening” strategies to compete with generic medication after patent termination. These include marketing of slightly modified follow-on drugs. We aimed to estimate the financial impact of these drugs on overall healthcare costs and also to examine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vernaz, Nathalie, Haller, Guy, Girardin, François, Huttner, Benedikt, Combescure, Christophe, Dayer, Pierre, Muscionico, Daniel, Salomon, Jean-Luc, Bonnabry, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001460
_version_ 1782272097292124160
author Vernaz, Nathalie
Haller, Guy
Girardin, François
Huttner, Benedikt
Combescure, Christophe
Dayer, Pierre
Muscionico, Daniel
Salomon, Jean-Luc
Bonnabry, Pascal
author_facet Vernaz, Nathalie
Haller, Guy
Girardin, François
Huttner, Benedikt
Combescure, Christophe
Dayer, Pierre
Muscionico, Daniel
Salomon, Jean-Luc
Bonnabry, Pascal
author_sort Vernaz, Nathalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug manufacturers have developed “evergreening” strategies to compete with generic medication after patent termination. These include marketing of slightly modified follow-on drugs. We aimed to estimate the financial impact of these drugs on overall healthcare costs and also to examine the impact of listing these drugs in hospital restrictive drug formularies (RDFs) on the healthcare system as a whole (“spillover effect”). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used hospital and community pharmacy invoice office data in the Swiss canton of Geneva to calculate utilisation of eight follow-on drugs in defined daily doses between 2000 and 2008. “Extra costs” were calculated for three different scenarios assuming replacement with the corresponding generic equivalent for prescriptions of (1) all brand (i.e., initially patented) drugs, (2) all follow-on drugs, or (3) brand and follow-on drugs. To examine the financial spillover effect we calculated a monthly follow-on drug market share in defined daily doses for medications prescribed by hospital physicians but dispensed in community pharmacies, in comparison to drugs prescribed by non-hospital physicians in the community. Estimated “extra costs” over the study period were €15.9 (95% CI 15.5; 16.2) million for scenario 1, €14.4 (95% CI 14.1; 14.7) million for scenario 2, and €30.3 (95% CI 29.8; 30.8) million for scenario 3. The impact of strictly switching all patients using proton-pump inhibitors to esomeprazole at admission resulted in a spillover “extra cost” of €330,300 (95% CI 276,100; 383,800), whereas strictly switching to generic cetirizine resulted in savings of €7,700 (95% CI 4,100; 11,100). Overall we estimated that the RDF resulted in “extra costs” of €503,600 (95% CI 444,500; 563,100). CONCLUSIONS: Evergreening strategies have been successful in maintaining market share in Geneva, offsetting competition by generics and cost containment policies. Hospitals may be contributing to increased overall healthcare costs by listing follow-on drugs in their RDF. Therefore, healthcare providers and policy makers should be aware of the impact of evergreening strategies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3672218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36722182013-06-07 Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis Vernaz, Nathalie Haller, Guy Girardin, François Huttner, Benedikt Combescure, Christophe Dayer, Pierre Muscionico, Daniel Salomon, Jean-Luc Bonnabry, Pascal PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Drug manufacturers have developed “evergreening” strategies to compete with generic medication after patent termination. These include marketing of slightly modified follow-on drugs. We aimed to estimate the financial impact of these drugs on overall healthcare costs and also to examine the impact of listing these drugs in hospital restrictive drug formularies (RDFs) on the healthcare system as a whole (“spillover effect”). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used hospital and community pharmacy invoice office data in the Swiss canton of Geneva to calculate utilisation of eight follow-on drugs in defined daily doses between 2000 and 2008. “Extra costs” were calculated for three different scenarios assuming replacement with the corresponding generic equivalent for prescriptions of (1) all brand (i.e., initially patented) drugs, (2) all follow-on drugs, or (3) brand and follow-on drugs. To examine the financial spillover effect we calculated a monthly follow-on drug market share in defined daily doses for medications prescribed by hospital physicians but dispensed in community pharmacies, in comparison to drugs prescribed by non-hospital physicians in the community. Estimated “extra costs” over the study period were €15.9 (95% CI 15.5; 16.2) million for scenario 1, €14.4 (95% CI 14.1; 14.7) million for scenario 2, and €30.3 (95% CI 29.8; 30.8) million for scenario 3. The impact of strictly switching all patients using proton-pump inhibitors to esomeprazole at admission resulted in a spillover “extra cost” of €330,300 (95% CI 276,100; 383,800), whereas strictly switching to generic cetirizine resulted in savings of €7,700 (95% CI 4,100; 11,100). Overall we estimated that the RDF resulted in “extra costs” of €503,600 (95% CI 444,500; 563,100). CONCLUSIONS: Evergreening strategies have been successful in maintaining market share in Geneva, offsetting competition by generics and cost containment policies. Hospitals may be contributing to increased overall healthcare costs by listing follow-on drugs in their RDF. Therefore, healthcare providers and policy makers should be aware of the impact of evergreening strategies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2013-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3672218/ /pubmed/23750120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001460 Text en © 2013 Vernaz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vernaz, Nathalie
Haller, Guy
Girardin, François
Huttner, Benedikt
Combescure, Christophe
Dayer, Pierre
Muscionico, Daniel
Salomon, Jean-Luc
Bonnabry, Pascal
Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis
title Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis
title_full Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis
title_fullStr Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis
title_short Patented Drug Extension Strategies on Healthcare Spending: A Cost-Evaluation Analysis
title_sort patented drug extension strategies on healthcare spending: a cost-evaluation analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001460
work_keys_str_mv AT vernaznathalie patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis
AT hallerguy patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis
AT girardinfrancois patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis
AT huttnerbenedikt patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis
AT combescurechristophe patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis
AT dayerpierre patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis
AT muscionicodaniel patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis
AT salomonjeanluc patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis
AT bonnabrypascal patenteddrugextensionstrategiesonhealthcarespendingacostevaluationanalysis