Cargando…
Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role?
INTRODUCTION: The mechanisms leading to patient/ventilator asynchrony has never been systematically assessed. We studied the possible association between asynchrony and respiratory mechanics in patients ready to be enrolled for a home non-invasive ventilatory program. Secondarily, we looked for poss...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12580 |
_version_ | 1782272121480675328 |
---|---|
author | Carlucci, Annalisa Pisani, Lara Ceriana, Piero Malovini, Alberto Nava, Stefano |
author_facet | Carlucci, Annalisa Pisani, Lara Ceriana, Piero Malovini, Alberto Nava, Stefano |
author_sort | Carlucci, Annalisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The mechanisms leading to patient/ventilator asynchrony has never been systematically assessed. We studied the possible association between asynchrony and respiratory mechanics in patients ready to be enrolled for a home non-invasive ventilatory program. Secondarily, we looked for possible differences in the amount of asynchronies between obstructive and restrictive patients and a possible role of asynchrony in influencing the tolerance of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). METHODS: The respiratory pattern and mechanics of 69 consecutive patients with chronic respiratory failure were recorded during spontaneous breathing. After that patients underwent non-invasive ventilation for 60 minutes with a "dedicated" NIV platform in a pressure support mode during the day. In the last 15 minutes of this period, asynchrony events were detected and classified as ineffective effort (IE), double triggering (DT) and auto-triggering (AT). RESULTS: The overall number of asynchronies was not influenced by any variable of respiratory mechanics or by the underlying pathologies (that is, obstructive vs restrictive patients). There was a high prevalence of asynchrony events (58% of patients). IEs were the most frequent asynchronous events (45% of patients) and were associated with a higher level of pressure support. A high incidence of asynchrony events and IE were associated with a poor tolerance of NIV. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that in non-invasively ventilated patients for a chronic respiratory failure, the incidence of patient-ventilator asynchronies was relatively high, but did not correlate with any parameters of respiratory mechanics or underlying disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3672543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36725432013-06-10 Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? Carlucci, Annalisa Pisani, Lara Ceriana, Piero Malovini, Alberto Nava, Stefano Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The mechanisms leading to patient/ventilator asynchrony has never been systematically assessed. We studied the possible association between asynchrony and respiratory mechanics in patients ready to be enrolled for a home non-invasive ventilatory program. Secondarily, we looked for possible differences in the amount of asynchronies between obstructive and restrictive patients and a possible role of asynchrony in influencing the tolerance of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). METHODS: The respiratory pattern and mechanics of 69 consecutive patients with chronic respiratory failure were recorded during spontaneous breathing. After that patients underwent non-invasive ventilation for 60 minutes with a "dedicated" NIV platform in a pressure support mode during the day. In the last 15 minutes of this period, asynchrony events were detected and classified as ineffective effort (IE), double triggering (DT) and auto-triggering (AT). RESULTS: The overall number of asynchronies was not influenced by any variable of respiratory mechanics or by the underlying pathologies (that is, obstructive vs restrictive patients). There was a high prevalence of asynchrony events (58% of patients). IEs were the most frequent asynchronous events (45% of patients) and were associated with a higher level of pressure support. A high incidence of asynchrony events and IE were associated with a poor tolerance of NIV. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that in non-invasively ventilated patients for a chronic respiratory failure, the incidence of patient-ventilator asynchronies was relatively high, but did not correlate with any parameters of respiratory mechanics or underlying disease. BioMed Central 2013 2013-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3672543/ /pubmed/23531269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12580 Text en Copyright © 2013 Carlucci et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Carlucci, Annalisa Pisani, Lara Ceriana, Piero Malovini, Alberto Nava, Stefano Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? |
title | Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? |
title_full | Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? |
title_fullStr | Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? |
title_short | Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? |
title_sort | patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12580 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlucciannalisa patientventilatorasynchroniesmaytherespiratorymechanicsplayarole AT pisanilara patientventilatorasynchroniesmaytherespiratorymechanicsplayarole AT cerianapiero patientventilatorasynchroniesmaytherespiratorymechanicsplayarole AT malovinialberto patientventilatorasynchroniesmaytherespiratorymechanicsplayarole AT navastefano patientventilatorasynchroniesmaytherespiratorymechanicsplayarole |