Cargando…
Bench-to-bedside review: Citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice
To prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) anticoagulation is required. Heparin is still the most commonly used anticoagulant. However, heparins increase the risk of bleeding, especially in critically ill patients. Evidence has accumulated th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23216871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11645 |
_version_ | 1782272124953559040 |
---|---|
author | Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M Ostermann, Marlies |
author_facet | Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M Ostermann, Marlies |
author_sort | Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M |
collection | PubMed |
description | To prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) anticoagulation is required. Heparin is still the most commonly used anticoagulant. However, heparins increase the risk of bleeding, especially in critically ill patients. Evidence has accumulated that regional anticoagulation of the CRRT circuit with citrate is feasible and safe. Compared to heparin, citrate anticoagulation reduces the risk of bleeding and requirement for blood products, not only in patients with coagulopathy, but also in those without. Metabolic complications are largely prevented by the use of a strict protocol, comprehensive training and integrated citrate software. Recent studies indicate that citrate can even be used in patients with significant liver disease provided that monitoring is intensified and the dose is carefully adjusted. Since the citric acid cycle is oxygen dependent, patients at greatest risk of accumulation seem to be those with persistent lactic acidosis due to poor tissue perfusion. The use of citrate may also be associated with less inflammation due to hypocalcemia-induced suppression of intracellular signaling at the membrane and avoidance of heparin, which may have proinflammatory properties. Whether these beneficial effects increase patient survival needs to be confirmed. However, other benefits are the reason that citrate should become the first choice anticoagulant for CRRT provided that its safe use can be guaranteed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3672558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36725582013-12-07 Bench-to-bedside review: Citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M Ostermann, Marlies Crit Care Review To prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) anticoagulation is required. Heparin is still the most commonly used anticoagulant. However, heparins increase the risk of bleeding, especially in critically ill patients. Evidence has accumulated that regional anticoagulation of the CRRT circuit with citrate is feasible and safe. Compared to heparin, citrate anticoagulation reduces the risk of bleeding and requirement for blood products, not only in patients with coagulopathy, but also in those without. Metabolic complications are largely prevented by the use of a strict protocol, comprehensive training and integrated citrate software. Recent studies indicate that citrate can even be used in patients with significant liver disease provided that monitoring is intensified and the dose is carefully adjusted. Since the citric acid cycle is oxygen dependent, patients at greatest risk of accumulation seem to be those with persistent lactic acidosis due to poor tissue perfusion. The use of citrate may also be associated with less inflammation due to hypocalcemia-induced suppression of intracellular signaling at the membrane and avoidance of heparin, which may have proinflammatory properties. Whether these beneficial effects increase patient survival needs to be confirmed. However, other benefits are the reason that citrate should become the first choice anticoagulant for CRRT provided that its safe use can be guaranteed. BioMed Central 2012 2012-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3672558/ /pubmed/23216871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11645 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M Ostermann, Marlies Bench-to-bedside review: Citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice |
title | Bench-to-bedside review: Citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice |
title_full | Bench-to-bedside review: Citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice |
title_fullStr | Bench-to-bedside review: Citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Bench-to-bedside review: Citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice |
title_short | Bench-to-bedside review: Citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice |
title_sort | bench-to-bedside review: citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy, from science to practice |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23216871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oudemansvanstraatenheleenm benchtobedsidereviewcitrateforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyfromsciencetopractice AT ostermannmarlies benchtobedsidereviewcitrateforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyfromsciencetopractice |