Cargando…

Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!

In the continuing dispute about the superiority of either intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy for the critically ill, hybrid methods such as sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) combining the advantages of both modalities - that is, excellent hemodynamic stability and low costs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Joannidis, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11651
_version_ 1782272125177954304
author Joannidis, Michael
author_facet Joannidis, Michael
author_sort Joannidis, Michael
collection PubMed
description In the continuing dispute about the superiority of either intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy for the critically ill, hybrid methods such as sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) combining the advantages of both modalities - that is, excellent hemodynamic stability and low costs - receive growing attention. The study by Schwenger and colleagues is the first randomized trial indicating that there may be no significant difference in survival at 90 days between patients treated with SLED as compared with those treated with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3672559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36725592013-11-05 Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast! Joannidis, Michael Crit Care Commentary In the continuing dispute about the superiority of either intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy for the critically ill, hybrid methods such as sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) combining the advantages of both modalities - that is, excellent hemodynamic stability and low costs - receive growing attention. The study by Schwenger and colleagues is the first randomized trial indicating that there may be no significant difference in survival at 90 days between patients treated with SLED as compared with those treated with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. BioMed Central 2012 2012-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3672559/ /pubmed/23148709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11651 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Joannidis, Michael
Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!
title Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!
title_full Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!
title_fullStr Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!
title_full_unstemmed Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!
title_short Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!
title_sort good-bye crrt, here comes sled? ... not so fast!
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11651
work_keys_str_mv AT joannidismichael goodbyecrrtherecomesslednotsofast