Cargando…
Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!
In the continuing dispute about the superiority of either intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy for the critically ill, hybrid methods such as sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) combining the advantages of both modalities - that is, excellent hemodynamic stability and low costs...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11651 |
_version_ | 1782272125177954304 |
---|---|
author | Joannidis, Michael |
author_facet | Joannidis, Michael |
author_sort | Joannidis, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the continuing dispute about the superiority of either intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy for the critically ill, hybrid methods such as sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) combining the advantages of both modalities - that is, excellent hemodynamic stability and low costs - receive growing attention. The study by Schwenger and colleagues is the first randomized trial indicating that there may be no significant difference in survival at 90 days between patients treated with SLED as compared with those treated with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3672559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36725592013-11-05 Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast! Joannidis, Michael Crit Care Commentary In the continuing dispute about the superiority of either intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy for the critically ill, hybrid methods such as sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) combining the advantages of both modalities - that is, excellent hemodynamic stability and low costs - receive growing attention. The study by Schwenger and colleagues is the first randomized trial indicating that there may be no significant difference in survival at 90 days between patients treated with SLED as compared with those treated with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. BioMed Central 2012 2012-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3672559/ /pubmed/23148709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11651 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Joannidis, Michael Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast! |
title | Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast! |
title_full | Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast! |
title_fullStr | Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast! |
title_full_unstemmed | Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast! |
title_short | Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast! |
title_sort | good-bye crrt, here comes sled? ... not so fast! |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joannidismichael goodbyecrrtherecomesslednotsofast |