Cargando…

Endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next?

In the previous issue of Critical Care, Ma and colleagues perform a meta-analysis of five randomized, clinical trials of endothelin antagonists in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. There are four trials using clazosentan and one trial with TAK-044. These studies show that endothelin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Macdonald, R Loch
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23146320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11822
_version_ 1782272128411762688
author Macdonald, R Loch
author_facet Macdonald, R Loch
author_sort Macdonald, R Loch
collection PubMed
description In the previous issue of Critical Care, Ma and colleagues perform a meta-analysis of five randomized, clinical trials of endothelin antagonists in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. There are four trials using clazosentan and one trial with TAK-044. These studies show that endothelin plays an important role in the genesis of angiographic vasospasm. The benefit of these drugs is less on delayed cerebral ischemia and nonexistent on overall clinical outcome. Why the drugs reduce vasospasm but do not improve outcome could be because of side effects such as hypotension and pulmonary complications that are more common in patients treated with endothelin antagonists or because rescue therapy, which is used more in the placebo groups, improves outcome in these patients to the same extent as the endothelin antagonists. As the authors conclude, future studies of these drugs will need to consider these and other factors in their design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3672573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36725732013-06-10 Endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next? Macdonald, R Loch Crit Care Commentary In the previous issue of Critical Care, Ma and colleagues perform a meta-analysis of five randomized, clinical trials of endothelin antagonists in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. There are four trials using clazosentan and one trial with TAK-044. These studies show that endothelin plays an important role in the genesis of angiographic vasospasm. The benefit of these drugs is less on delayed cerebral ischemia and nonexistent on overall clinical outcome. Why the drugs reduce vasospasm but do not improve outcome could be because of side effects such as hypotension and pulmonary complications that are more common in patients treated with endothelin antagonists or because rescue therapy, which is used more in the placebo groups, improves outcome in these patients to the same extent as the endothelin antagonists. As the authors conclude, future studies of these drugs will need to consider these and other factors in their design. BioMed Central 2012 2012-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3672573/ /pubmed/23146320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11822 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Macdonald, R Loch
Endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next?
title Endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next?
title_full Endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next?
title_fullStr Endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next?
title_full_unstemmed Endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next?
title_short Endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next?
title_sort endothelin antagonists in subarachnoid hemorrhage: what next?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23146320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11822
work_keys_str_mv AT macdonaldrloch endothelinantagonistsinsubarachnoidhemorrhagewhatnext