Cargando…
Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: how to guide fluid therapy?
Autores principales: | Hunsicker, Oliver, Francis, Roland C |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23153017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11836 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: The CRYSTMAS study
por: Guidet, Bertrand, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
por: Haase, Nicolai, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Assessment of renal hemodynamic toxicity of fluid challenge with 0.9% NaCl compared to balanced crystalloid (PlasmaLyte(®)) in a rat model with severe sepsis
por: Olivier, Pierre-Yves, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
por: Staikou, Chryssoula, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Assessment of coagulation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in cesarean section
por: Oh, Chung-Sik, et al.
Publicado: (2012)