Cargando…

Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients

The lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategy has been standard practice for management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for more than a decade. Observational data, small randomized studies and two recent systematic reviews suggest that lung protective ventilation is both safe and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilickaya, Oguz, Gajic, Ognjen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12516
_version_ 1782272145384013824
author Kilickaya, Oguz
Gajic, Ognjen
author_facet Kilickaya, Oguz
Gajic, Ognjen
author_sort Kilickaya, Oguz
collection PubMed
description The lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategy has been standard practice for management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for more than a decade. Observational data, small randomized studies and two recent systematic reviews suggest that lung protective ventilation is both safe and potentially beneficial in patients who do not have ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation. Principles of lung-protective ventilation include: a) prevention of volutrauma (tidal volume 4 to 8 ml/kg predicted body weight with plateau pressure <30 cmH(2)O); b) prevention of atelectasis (positive end-expiratory pressure ≥5 cmH(2)O, as needed recruitment maneuvers); c) adequate ventilation (respiratory rate 20 to 35 breaths per minute); and d) prevention of hyperoxia (titrate inspired oxygen concentration to peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) levels of 88 to 95%). Most patients tolerate lung protective mechanical ventilation well without the need for excessive sedation. Patients with a stiff chest wall may tolerate higher plateau pressure targets (approximately 35 cmH(2)O) while those with severe ARDS and ventilator asynchrony may require a short-term neuromuscular blockade. Given the difficulty in timely identification of patients with or at risk of ARDS and both the safety and potential benefit in patients without ARDS, lung-protective mechanical ventilation is recommended as an initial approach to mechanical ventilation in both perioperative and critical care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3672640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36726402014-03-13 Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients Kilickaya, Oguz Gajic, Ognjen Crit Care Commentary The lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategy has been standard practice for management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for more than a decade. Observational data, small randomized studies and two recent systematic reviews suggest that lung protective ventilation is both safe and potentially beneficial in patients who do not have ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation. Principles of lung-protective ventilation include: a) prevention of volutrauma (tidal volume 4 to 8 ml/kg predicted body weight with plateau pressure <30 cmH(2)O); b) prevention of atelectasis (positive end-expiratory pressure ≥5 cmH(2)O, as needed recruitment maneuvers); c) adequate ventilation (respiratory rate 20 to 35 breaths per minute); and d) prevention of hyperoxia (titrate inspired oxygen concentration to peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) levels of 88 to 95%). Most patients tolerate lung protective mechanical ventilation well without the need for excessive sedation. Patients with a stiff chest wall may tolerate higher plateau pressure targets (approximately 35 cmH(2)O) while those with severe ARDS and ventilator asynchrony may require a short-term neuromuscular blockade. Given the difficulty in timely identification of patients with or at risk of ARDS and both the safety and potential benefit in patients without ARDS, lung-protective mechanical ventilation is recommended as an initial approach to mechanical ventilation in both perioperative and critical care settings. BioMed Central 2013 2013-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3672640/ /pubmed/23510269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12516 Text en Copyright © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Kilickaya, Oguz
Gajic, Ognjen
Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients
title Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients
title_full Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients
title_fullStr Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients
title_short Initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients
title_sort initial ventilator settings for critically ill patients
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12516
work_keys_str_mv AT kilickayaoguz initialventilatorsettingsforcriticallyillpatients
AT gajicognjen initialventilatorsettingsforcriticallyillpatients