Cargando…
Is TIMP-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial?
INTRODUCTION: Predictive cancer biomarkers to guide the right treatment to the right patient at the right time are strongly needed. The purpose of the present study was to validate prior results that tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) alone or in combination with either HER2 or TOP2A c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23570501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3411 |
_version_ | 1782272159472680960 |
---|---|
author | Munro, Alison F Bartels, Annette Balslev, Eva Twelves, Christopher J Cameron, David A Brünner, Nils Bartlett, John MS |
author_facet | Munro, Alison F Bartels, Annette Balslev, Eva Twelves, Christopher J Cameron, David A Brünner, Nils Bartlett, John MS |
author_sort | Munro, Alison F |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Predictive cancer biomarkers to guide the right treatment to the right patient at the right time are strongly needed. The purpose of the present study was to validate prior results that tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) alone or in combination with either HER2 or TOP2A copy number can be used to predict benefit from epirubicin (E) containing chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) treatment. METHODS: For the purpose of this study, formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue from women recruited into the BR9601 clinical trial, which randomized patients to E-CMF versus CMF, were analyzed for TIMP-1 immunoreactivity. Using previously collected data for HER2 amplification and TOP2A gene aberrations, we defined patients as "anthracycline non-responsive", that is, 2T (TIMP-1 immunoreactive and TOP2A normal) and HT (TIMP-1 immunoreactive and HER2 negative) and anthracycline responsive (all other cases). RESULTS: In total, 288 tumors were available for TIMP-1 analysis with (183/274) 66.8%, and (181/274) 66.0% being classed as 2T and HT responsive, respectively. TIMP-1 was neither associated with patient prognosis (relapse free survival or overall survival) nor with a differential effect of E-CMF and CMF. Also, TIMP-1 did not add to the predictive value of HER2, TOP2A gene aberrations, or to Ki67 immunoreactivity. CONCLUSION: This study could not confirm the predictive value of TIMP-1 immunoreactivity in patients randomized to receive E-CMF versus CMF as adjuvant treatment for primary breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3672718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36727182013-06-06 Is TIMP-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial? Munro, Alison F Bartels, Annette Balslev, Eva Twelves, Christopher J Cameron, David A Brünner, Nils Bartlett, John MS Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Predictive cancer biomarkers to guide the right treatment to the right patient at the right time are strongly needed. The purpose of the present study was to validate prior results that tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) alone or in combination with either HER2 or TOP2A copy number can be used to predict benefit from epirubicin (E) containing chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) treatment. METHODS: For the purpose of this study, formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue from women recruited into the BR9601 clinical trial, which randomized patients to E-CMF versus CMF, were analyzed for TIMP-1 immunoreactivity. Using previously collected data for HER2 amplification and TOP2A gene aberrations, we defined patients as "anthracycline non-responsive", that is, 2T (TIMP-1 immunoreactive and TOP2A normal) and HT (TIMP-1 immunoreactive and HER2 negative) and anthracycline responsive (all other cases). RESULTS: In total, 288 tumors were available for TIMP-1 analysis with (183/274) 66.8%, and (181/274) 66.0% being classed as 2T and HT responsive, respectively. TIMP-1 was neither associated with patient prognosis (relapse free survival or overall survival) nor with a differential effect of E-CMF and CMF. Also, TIMP-1 did not add to the predictive value of HER2, TOP2A gene aberrations, or to Ki67 immunoreactivity. CONCLUSION: This study could not confirm the predictive value of TIMP-1 immunoreactivity in patients randomized to receive E-CMF versus CMF as adjuvant treatment for primary breast cancer. BioMed Central 2013 2013-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3672718/ /pubmed/23570501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3411 Text en Copyright © 2013 Munro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Munro, Alison F Bartels, Annette Balslev, Eva Twelves, Christopher J Cameron, David A Brünner, Nils Bartlett, John MS Is TIMP-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial? |
title | Is TIMP-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial? |
title_full | Is TIMP-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial? |
title_fullStr | Is TIMP-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is TIMP-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial? |
title_short | Is TIMP-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial? |
title_sort | is timp-1 immunoreactivity alone or in combination with other markers a predictor of benefit from anthracyclines in the br9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23570501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munroalisonf istimp1immunoreactivityaloneorincombinationwithothermarkersapredictorofbenefitfromanthracyclinesinthebr9601adjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapytrial AT bartelsannette istimp1immunoreactivityaloneorincombinationwithothermarkersapredictorofbenefitfromanthracyclinesinthebr9601adjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapytrial AT balsleveva istimp1immunoreactivityaloneorincombinationwithothermarkersapredictorofbenefitfromanthracyclinesinthebr9601adjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapytrial AT twelveschristopherj istimp1immunoreactivityaloneorincombinationwithothermarkersapredictorofbenefitfromanthracyclinesinthebr9601adjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapytrial AT camerondavida istimp1immunoreactivityaloneorincombinationwithothermarkersapredictorofbenefitfromanthracyclinesinthebr9601adjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapytrial AT brunnernils istimp1immunoreactivityaloneorincombinationwithothermarkersapredictorofbenefitfromanthracyclinesinthebr9601adjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapytrial AT bartlettjohnms istimp1immunoreactivityaloneorincombinationwithothermarkersapredictorofbenefitfromanthracyclinesinthebr9601adjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapytrial |