Cargando…

Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium

Background: Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have potential benefits, but they also present safety concerns for human health. Interlaboratory studies in rodents using standardized protocols are needed to assess ENM toxicity. Methods: Four laboratories evaluated lung responses in C57BL/6 mice to ENMs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonner, James C., Silva, Rona M., Taylor, Alexia J., Brown, Jared M., Hilderbrand, Susana C., Castranova, Vincent, Porter, Dale, Elder, Alison, Oberdörster, Günter, Harkema, Jack R., Bramble, Lori A., Kavanagh, Terrance J., Botta, Dianne, Nel, Andre, Pinkerton, Kent E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205693
_version_ 1782272190507384832
author Bonner, James C.
Silva, Rona M.
Taylor, Alexia J.
Brown, Jared M.
Hilderbrand, Susana C.
Castranova, Vincent
Porter, Dale
Elder, Alison
Oberdörster, Günter
Harkema, Jack R.
Bramble, Lori A.
Kavanagh, Terrance J.
Botta, Dianne
Nel, Andre
Pinkerton, Kent E.
author_facet Bonner, James C.
Silva, Rona M.
Taylor, Alexia J.
Brown, Jared M.
Hilderbrand, Susana C.
Castranova, Vincent
Porter, Dale
Elder, Alison
Oberdörster, Günter
Harkema, Jack R.
Bramble, Lori A.
Kavanagh, Terrance J.
Botta, Dianne
Nel, Andre
Pinkerton, Kent E.
author_sort Bonner, James C.
collection PubMed
description Background: Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have potential benefits, but they also present safety concerns for human health. Interlaboratory studies in rodents using standardized protocols are needed to assess ENM toxicity. Methods: Four laboratories evaluated lung responses in C57BL/6 mice to ENMs delivered by oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA), and three labs evaluated Sprague-Dawley (SD) or Fisher 344 (F344) rats following intratracheal instillation (IT). ENMs tested included three forms of titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) [anatase/rutile spheres (TiO(2)-P25), anatase spheres (TiO(2)-A), and anatase nanobelts (TiO(2)-NBs)] and three forms of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [original (O), purified (P), and carboxylic acid “functionalized” (F)]. One day after treatment, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was collected to determine differential cell counts, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and protein. Lungs were fixed for histopathology. Responses were also examined at 7 days (TiO(2) forms) and 21 days (MWCNTs) after treatment. Results: TiO(2)-A, TiO(2)-P25, and TiO(2)-NB caused significant neutrophilia in mice at 1 day in three of four labs. TiO(2)-NB caused neutrophilia in rats at 1 day in two of three labs, and TiO(2)-P25 and TiO(2)-A had no significant effect in any of the labs. Inflammation induced by TiO(2) in mice and rats resolved by day 7. All MWCNT types caused neutrophilia at 1 day in three of four mouse labs and in all rat labs. Three of four labs observed similar histopathology to O-MWCNTs and TiO(2)-NBs in mice. Conclusions: ENMs produced similar patterns of neutrophilia and pathology in rats and mice. Although interlaboratory variability was found in the degree of neutrophilia caused by the three types of TiO(2) nanoparticles, similar findings of relative potency for the three types of MWCNTs were found across all laboratories, thus providing greater confidence in these interlaboratory comparisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3672912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36729122013-06-13 Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium Bonner, James C. Silva, Rona M. Taylor, Alexia J. Brown, Jared M. Hilderbrand, Susana C. Castranova, Vincent Porter, Dale Elder, Alison Oberdörster, Günter Harkema, Jack R. Bramble, Lori A. Kavanagh, Terrance J. Botta, Dianne Nel, Andre Pinkerton, Kent E. Environ Health Perspect Research Background: Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have potential benefits, but they also present safety concerns for human health. Interlaboratory studies in rodents using standardized protocols are needed to assess ENM toxicity. Methods: Four laboratories evaluated lung responses in C57BL/6 mice to ENMs delivered by oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA), and three labs evaluated Sprague-Dawley (SD) or Fisher 344 (F344) rats following intratracheal instillation (IT). ENMs tested included three forms of titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) [anatase/rutile spheres (TiO(2)-P25), anatase spheres (TiO(2)-A), and anatase nanobelts (TiO(2)-NBs)] and three forms of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [original (O), purified (P), and carboxylic acid “functionalized” (F)]. One day after treatment, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was collected to determine differential cell counts, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and protein. Lungs were fixed for histopathology. Responses were also examined at 7 days (TiO(2) forms) and 21 days (MWCNTs) after treatment. Results: TiO(2)-A, TiO(2)-P25, and TiO(2)-NB caused significant neutrophilia in mice at 1 day in three of four labs. TiO(2)-NB caused neutrophilia in rats at 1 day in two of three labs, and TiO(2)-P25 and TiO(2)-A had no significant effect in any of the labs. Inflammation induced by TiO(2) in mice and rats resolved by day 7. All MWCNT types caused neutrophilia at 1 day in three of four mouse labs and in all rat labs. Three of four labs observed similar histopathology to O-MWCNTs and TiO(2)-NBs in mice. Conclusions: ENMs produced similar patterns of neutrophilia and pathology in rats and mice. Although interlaboratory variability was found in the degree of neutrophilia caused by the three types of TiO(2) nanoparticles, similar findings of relative potency for the three types of MWCNTs were found across all laboratories, thus providing greater confidence in these interlaboratory comparisons. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2013-05-06 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3672912/ /pubmed/23649427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205693 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Bonner, James C.
Silva, Rona M.
Taylor, Alexia J.
Brown, Jared M.
Hilderbrand, Susana C.
Castranova, Vincent
Porter, Dale
Elder, Alison
Oberdörster, Günter
Harkema, Jack R.
Bramble, Lori A.
Kavanagh, Terrance J.
Botta, Dianne
Nel, Andre
Pinkerton, Kent E.
Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium
title Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium
title_full Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium
title_fullStr Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium
title_full_unstemmed Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium
title_short Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium
title_sort interlaboratory evaluation of rodent pulmonary responses to engineered nanomaterials: the niehs nano go consortium
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3672912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205693
work_keys_str_mv AT bonnerjamesc interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT silvaronam interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT tayloralexiaj interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT brownjaredm interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT hilderbrandsusanac interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT castranovavincent interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT porterdale interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT elderalison interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT oberdorstergunter interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT harkemajackr interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT brambleloria interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT kavanaghterrancej interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT bottadianne interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT nelandre interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium
AT pinkertonkente interlaboratoryevaluationofrodentpulmonaryresponsestoengineerednanomaterialstheniehsnanogoconsortium