Cargando…

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study

CONTEXT: Spinal anaesthesia has been reported as an alternative to general anaesthesia for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). AIMS: Study aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety and cost benefit of conducting laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia (SA) in comparison to general a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiwari, Sangeeta, Chauhan, Ashutosh, Chaterjee, Pallab, Alam, Mohammed T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23741111
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.110965
_version_ 1782272267215962112
author Tiwari, Sangeeta
Chauhan, Ashutosh
Chaterjee, Pallab
Alam, Mohammed T
author_facet Tiwari, Sangeeta
Chauhan, Ashutosh
Chaterjee, Pallab
Alam, Mohammed T
author_sort Tiwari, Sangeeta
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Spinal anaesthesia has been reported as an alternative to general anaesthesia for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). AIMS: Study aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety and cost benefit of conducting laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia (SA) in comparison to general anaesthesia(GA) SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective, randomised study conducted over a two year period at an urban, non teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients meeting inclusion criteria e randomised into two groups. Group A and Group B received general and spinal anaesthesia by standardised techniques. Both groups underwent standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Mean anaesthesia time, pneumoperitoneum time and surgery time defined primary outcome measures. Intraoperative events and post operative pain score were secondary outcome measure. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The Student t test, Pearson′s chi-square test and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Out of 235 cases enrolled in the study, 114 cases in Group A and 110 in Group B analysed. Mean anaesthesia time appeared to be more in the GA group (49.45 vs. 40.64, P = 0.02) while pneumoperitoneum time and corresponding the total surgery time was slightly longer in the SA group. 27/117 cases who received SA experienced intraoperative events, four significant enough to convert to GA. No postoperative complications noted in either group. Pain relief significantly more in SA group in immediate post operative period (06 and 12 hours) but same as GA group at time of discharge (24 hours). No late postoperative complication or readmission noted in either group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy done under spinal anaesthesia as a routine anaesthesia of choice is feasible and safe. Spinal anaesthesia can be recommended to be the anaesthesia technique of choice for conducting laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospital setups in developing countries where cost factor is a major factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3673576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36735762013-06-05 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study Tiwari, Sangeeta Chauhan, Ashutosh Chaterjee, Pallab Alam, Mohammed T J Minim Access Surg Original Article CONTEXT: Spinal anaesthesia has been reported as an alternative to general anaesthesia for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). AIMS: Study aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety and cost benefit of conducting laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia (SA) in comparison to general anaesthesia(GA) SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective, randomised study conducted over a two year period at an urban, non teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients meeting inclusion criteria e randomised into two groups. Group A and Group B received general and spinal anaesthesia by standardised techniques. Both groups underwent standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Mean anaesthesia time, pneumoperitoneum time and surgery time defined primary outcome measures. Intraoperative events and post operative pain score were secondary outcome measure. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The Student t test, Pearson′s chi-square test and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Out of 235 cases enrolled in the study, 114 cases in Group A and 110 in Group B analysed. Mean anaesthesia time appeared to be more in the GA group (49.45 vs. 40.64, P = 0.02) while pneumoperitoneum time and corresponding the total surgery time was slightly longer in the SA group. 27/117 cases who received SA experienced intraoperative events, four significant enough to convert to GA. No postoperative complications noted in either group. Pain relief significantly more in SA group in immediate post operative period (06 and 12 hours) but same as GA group at time of discharge (24 hours). No late postoperative complication or readmission noted in either group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy done under spinal anaesthesia as a routine anaesthesia of choice is feasible and safe. Spinal anaesthesia can be recommended to be the anaesthesia technique of choice for conducting laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospital setups in developing countries where cost factor is a major factor. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3673576/ /pubmed/23741111 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.110965 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tiwari, Sangeeta
Chauhan, Ashutosh
Chaterjee, Pallab
Alam, Mohammed T
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study
title Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study
title_full Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study
title_fullStr Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study
title_short Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study
title_sort laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: a prospective, randomised study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23741111
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.110965
work_keys_str_mv AT tiwarisangeeta laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT chauhanashutosh laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT chaterjeepallab laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT alammohammedt laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy