Cargando…

Blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review

Anaemia is associated with inferior outcomes in critically ill patients. It is difficult to prevent and is treated commonly with the transfusion of packed red cells. However, transfusion to augment oxygen delivery has not been shown to consistently offer a survival advantage when the haemoglobin con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Page, Catherine, Retter, Andrew, Wyncoll, Duncan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23714376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-14
_version_ 1782272277887320064
author Page, Catherine
Retter, Andrew
Wyncoll, Duncan
author_facet Page, Catherine
Retter, Andrew
Wyncoll, Duncan
author_sort Page, Catherine
collection PubMed
description Anaemia is associated with inferior outcomes in critically ill patients. It is difficult to prevent and is treated commonly with the transfusion of packed red cells. However, transfusion to augment oxygen delivery has not been shown to consistently offer a survival advantage when the haemoglobin concentration exceeds 7 g/dL. Several studies point to inferior outcomes when patients are transfused. Observational studies have confirmed that critically ill patients have frequent blood draws as part of their routine daily care. Cumulatively large volumes of blood are frequently taken, which contribute significantly towards the development of anaemia. Reducing iatrogenic blood loss may reduce the risk of developing anaemia and possibly the need for transfusion. Blood conservation devices may help to achieve this goal. The integration of blood conservation devices into routine care has been relatively slow in critical care. This review summarises the current evidence base and confirms that blood conservation devices do reduce the volume of iatrogenic blood loss. In the most recent studies, these devices have been shown to reduce transfusion requirements even in those intensive care units that follow a restrictive transfusion strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3673809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36738092013-06-06 Blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review Page, Catherine Retter, Andrew Wyncoll, Duncan Ann Intensive Care Review Anaemia is associated with inferior outcomes in critically ill patients. It is difficult to prevent and is treated commonly with the transfusion of packed red cells. However, transfusion to augment oxygen delivery has not been shown to consistently offer a survival advantage when the haemoglobin concentration exceeds 7 g/dL. Several studies point to inferior outcomes when patients are transfused. Observational studies have confirmed that critically ill patients have frequent blood draws as part of their routine daily care. Cumulatively large volumes of blood are frequently taken, which contribute significantly towards the development of anaemia. Reducing iatrogenic blood loss may reduce the risk of developing anaemia and possibly the need for transfusion. Blood conservation devices may help to achieve this goal. The integration of blood conservation devices into routine care has been relatively slow in critical care. This review summarises the current evidence base and confirms that blood conservation devices do reduce the volume of iatrogenic blood loss. In the most recent studies, these devices have been shown to reduce transfusion requirements even in those intensive care units that follow a restrictive transfusion strategy. Springer 2013-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3673809/ /pubmed/23714376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-14 Text en Copyright ©2013 Page et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Page, Catherine
Retter, Andrew
Wyncoll, Duncan
Blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review
title Blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review
title_full Blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review
title_fullStr Blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review
title_short Blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review
title_sort blood conservation devices in critical care: a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23714376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-14
work_keys_str_mv AT pagecatherine bloodconservationdevicesincriticalcareanarrativereview
AT retterandrew bloodconservationdevicesincriticalcareanarrativereview
AT wyncollduncan bloodconservationdevicesincriticalcareanarrativereview