Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients

OBJECTIVES: Parallel comparison with 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) ophthalmic gel to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel for the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis (HSK). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study. HSK pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Tong, Gong, Lan, Sun, Xing-huai, Zhao, Nai-qing, Chen, Wei, Yuan, Hui-ping, Shao, Yan, Gao, Ming-hong, Tang, Hai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761964
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S42624
_version_ 1782272289943846912
author Lin, Tong
Gong, Lan
Sun, Xing-huai
Zhao, Nai-qing
Chen, Wei
Yuan, Hui-ping
Shao, Yan
Gao, Ming-hong
Tang, Hai
author_facet Lin, Tong
Gong, Lan
Sun, Xing-huai
Zhao, Nai-qing
Chen, Wei
Yuan, Hui-ping
Shao, Yan
Gao, Ming-hong
Tang, Hai
author_sort Lin, Tong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Parallel comparison with 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) ophthalmic gel to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel for the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis (HSK). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study. HSK patients were randomly divided into two groups, with the corresponding treatment of 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel or 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel. Symptoms and signs were observed before administration, and 3 (±1), 7 (±1), 14 (±2), and 21 (±3) days after the administration. The clinical effective rate was considered as the primary outcome. The safety profile was evaluated by AEs, visual acuity, and ocular tolerance. RESULTS: The clinical effective rate in the per-protocol (PP) dataset for the treatment group and the control group were 95.10% and 93.00%, respectively (P = 0.5282). The noninferiority test showed significant differences (P = 0.000305, P < 0.025), indicating that the tested drug was noninferior to the control. Patients in the PP dataset of both groups experienced decreases in the total scores of clinical indicators. Ocular AEs were few but similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences between patients’ visions between the two groups before and after administration in the safety analysis set. In terms of drug tolerance, the rates of patients without transient blurred vision during all the visits in the treatment group were higher than those for the control group (P < 0.05). During the third and fourth visits, the rates of patients with eye itching were 4.08% and 1.22% in the treatment group, and 13.59% and 8.14% in the control group, respectively (P < 0.05). During the second visit, the rates of patients with eye irritation were 14.42% in the treatment group and 25.71% in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel was effective and safe for the treatment of HSK, and was not inferior to 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel. The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel presented superior ocular tolerance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3673863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36738632013-06-12 Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients Lin, Tong Gong, Lan Sun, Xing-huai Zhao, Nai-qing Chen, Wei Yuan, Hui-ping Shao, Yan Gao, Ming-hong Tang, Hai Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research OBJECTIVES: Parallel comparison with 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) ophthalmic gel to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel for the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis (HSK). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study. HSK patients were randomly divided into two groups, with the corresponding treatment of 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel or 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel. Symptoms and signs were observed before administration, and 3 (±1), 7 (±1), 14 (±2), and 21 (±3) days after the administration. The clinical effective rate was considered as the primary outcome. The safety profile was evaluated by AEs, visual acuity, and ocular tolerance. RESULTS: The clinical effective rate in the per-protocol (PP) dataset for the treatment group and the control group were 95.10% and 93.00%, respectively (P = 0.5282). The noninferiority test showed significant differences (P = 0.000305, P < 0.025), indicating that the tested drug was noninferior to the control. Patients in the PP dataset of both groups experienced decreases in the total scores of clinical indicators. Ocular AEs were few but similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences between patients’ visions between the two groups before and after administration in the safety analysis set. In terms of drug tolerance, the rates of patients without transient blurred vision during all the visits in the treatment group were higher than those for the control group (P < 0.05). During the third and fourth visits, the rates of patients with eye itching were 4.08% and 1.22% in the treatment group, and 13.59% and 8.14% in the control group, respectively (P < 0.05). During the second visit, the rates of patients with eye irritation were 14.42% in the treatment group and 25.71% in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel was effective and safe for the treatment of HSK, and was not inferior to 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel. The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel presented superior ocular tolerance. Dove Medical Press 2013-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3673863/ /pubmed/23761964 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S42624 Text en © 2013 Lin et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lin, Tong
Gong, Lan
Sun, Xing-huai
Zhao, Nai-qing
Chen, Wei
Yuan, Hui-ping
Shao, Yan
Gao, Ming-hong
Tang, Hai
Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients
title Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients
title_full Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients
title_short Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients
title_sort effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in chinese patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761964
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S42624
work_keys_str_mv AT lintong effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients
AT gonglan effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients
AT sunxinghuai effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients
AT zhaonaiqing effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients
AT chenwei effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients
AT yuanhuiping effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients
AT shaoyan effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients
AT gaominghong effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients
AT tanghai effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients