Cargando…
Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients
OBJECTIVES: Parallel comparison with 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) ophthalmic gel to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel for the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis (HSK). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study. HSK pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761964 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S42624 |
_version_ | 1782272289943846912 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Tong Gong, Lan Sun, Xing-huai Zhao, Nai-qing Chen, Wei Yuan, Hui-ping Shao, Yan Gao, Ming-hong Tang, Hai |
author_facet | Lin, Tong Gong, Lan Sun, Xing-huai Zhao, Nai-qing Chen, Wei Yuan, Hui-ping Shao, Yan Gao, Ming-hong Tang, Hai |
author_sort | Lin, Tong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Parallel comparison with 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) ophthalmic gel to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel for the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis (HSK). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study. HSK patients were randomly divided into two groups, with the corresponding treatment of 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel or 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel. Symptoms and signs were observed before administration, and 3 (±1), 7 (±1), 14 (±2), and 21 (±3) days after the administration. The clinical effective rate was considered as the primary outcome. The safety profile was evaluated by AEs, visual acuity, and ocular tolerance. RESULTS: The clinical effective rate in the per-protocol (PP) dataset for the treatment group and the control group were 95.10% and 93.00%, respectively (P = 0.5282). The noninferiority test showed significant differences (P = 0.000305, P < 0.025), indicating that the tested drug was noninferior to the control. Patients in the PP dataset of both groups experienced decreases in the total scores of clinical indicators. Ocular AEs were few but similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences between patients’ visions between the two groups before and after administration in the safety analysis set. In terms of drug tolerance, the rates of patients without transient blurred vision during all the visits in the treatment group were higher than those for the control group (P < 0.05). During the third and fourth visits, the rates of patients with eye itching were 4.08% and 1.22% in the treatment group, and 13.59% and 8.14% in the control group, respectively (P < 0.05). During the second visit, the rates of patients with eye irritation were 14.42% in the treatment group and 25.71% in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel was effective and safe for the treatment of HSK, and was not inferior to 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel. The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel presented superior ocular tolerance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3673863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36738632013-06-12 Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients Lin, Tong Gong, Lan Sun, Xing-huai Zhao, Nai-qing Chen, Wei Yuan, Hui-ping Shao, Yan Gao, Ming-hong Tang, Hai Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research OBJECTIVES: Parallel comparison with 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) ophthalmic gel to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel for the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis (HSK). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study. HSK patients were randomly divided into two groups, with the corresponding treatment of 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel or 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel. Symptoms and signs were observed before administration, and 3 (±1), 7 (±1), 14 (±2), and 21 (±3) days after the administration. The clinical effective rate was considered as the primary outcome. The safety profile was evaluated by AEs, visual acuity, and ocular tolerance. RESULTS: The clinical effective rate in the per-protocol (PP) dataset for the treatment group and the control group were 95.10% and 93.00%, respectively (P = 0.5282). The noninferiority test showed significant differences (P = 0.000305, P < 0.025), indicating that the tested drug was noninferior to the control. Patients in the PP dataset of both groups experienced decreases in the total scores of clinical indicators. Ocular AEs were few but similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences between patients’ visions between the two groups before and after administration in the safety analysis set. In terms of drug tolerance, the rates of patients without transient blurred vision during all the visits in the treatment group were higher than those for the control group (P < 0.05). During the third and fourth visits, the rates of patients with eye itching were 4.08% and 1.22% in the treatment group, and 13.59% and 8.14% in the control group, respectively (P < 0.05). During the second visit, the rates of patients with eye irritation were 14.42% in the treatment group and 25.71% in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel was effective and safe for the treatment of HSK, and was not inferior to 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel. The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel presented superior ocular tolerance. Dove Medical Press 2013-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3673863/ /pubmed/23761964 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S42624 Text en © 2013 Lin et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lin, Tong Gong, Lan Sun, Xing-huai Zhao, Nai-qing Chen, Wei Yuan, Hui-ping Shao, Yan Gao, Ming-hong Tang, Hai Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients |
title | Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients |
title_full | Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients |
title_short | Effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients |
title_sort | effectiveness and safety of 0.15% ganciclovir in situ ophthalmic gel for herpes simplex keratitis – a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in chinese patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761964 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S42624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lintong effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients AT gonglan effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients AT sunxinghuai effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients AT zhaonaiqing effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients AT chenwei effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients AT yuanhuiping effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients AT shaoyan effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients AT gaominghong effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients AT tanghai effectivenessandsafetyof015ganciclovirinsituophthalmicgelforherpessimplexkeratitisamulticenterrandomizedinvestigatormaskedparallelgroupstudyinchinesepatients |