Cargando…

Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of individuals living with cancer has led to a focus on the quality of life of survivors, and their families. Sexual wellbeing is a central component of quality of life, with a growing body of research demonstrating the association between cancer and changes to sexu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perz, Janette, Ussher, Jane M, Gilbert, Emilee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-270
_version_ 1782272290608644096
author Perz, Janette
Ussher, Jane M
Gilbert, Emilee
author_facet Perz, Janette
Ussher, Jane M
Gilbert, Emilee
author_sort Perz, Janette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing number of individuals living with cancer has led to a focus on the quality of life of survivors, and their families. Sexual wellbeing is a central component of quality of life, with a growing body of research demonstrating the association between cancer and changes to sexuality and intimacy. However, little is known about patient and professional understanding of cancer and sexuality post-cancer. This study was designed to explore the complex perspectives that people with personal and professional experience with cancer hold about sexuality in the context of cancer. METHODS: An interview study using Q methodology was conducted with 44 people with cancer, 35 partners of a person with cancer and 37 health professionals working in oncology. Participants were asked to rank-order 56 statements about sexuality and intimacy after cancer and asked to comment on their rankings in a subsequent semi-structured interview. A by-person factor analysis was performed with factors extracted according to the centroid method with a varimax rotation. RESULTS: A three-factor solution provided the best conceptual fit for the perspectives regarding intimacy and sexuality post-cancer. Factor 1, entitled “communication – dispelling myths about sex and intimacy” positions communication as central to the acceptance of a range of satisfying sexual and intimate practices post-cancer. Factor 2, “valuing sexuality across the cancer journey,” centres on the theme of normalizing the experience of sex after cancer through the renegotiation of sex and intimacy: the development of alternative sexual practices. Factor 3, “intimacy beyond sex,” presents the view that even though sex may not be wanted, desired, or even possible following cancer, quality of life and relationship satisfaction are achieved through communication and non-genital intimacy. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated the complexity of perspectives about sexuality and intimacy post cancer, which has practical implications for those working in cancer care and survivorship. Therapists and other health professionals can play an important role in ameliorating concerns surrounding sexual wellbeing after cancer, by opening and facilitating discussion of sexuality and intimacy amongst couples affected by cancer, as well as providing information that normalizes a range of sexual and intimate practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3673866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36738662013-06-06 Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals Perz, Janette Ussher, Jane M Gilbert, Emilee BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing number of individuals living with cancer has led to a focus on the quality of life of survivors, and their families. Sexual wellbeing is a central component of quality of life, with a growing body of research demonstrating the association between cancer and changes to sexuality and intimacy. However, little is known about patient and professional understanding of cancer and sexuality post-cancer. This study was designed to explore the complex perspectives that people with personal and professional experience with cancer hold about sexuality in the context of cancer. METHODS: An interview study using Q methodology was conducted with 44 people with cancer, 35 partners of a person with cancer and 37 health professionals working in oncology. Participants were asked to rank-order 56 statements about sexuality and intimacy after cancer and asked to comment on their rankings in a subsequent semi-structured interview. A by-person factor analysis was performed with factors extracted according to the centroid method with a varimax rotation. RESULTS: A three-factor solution provided the best conceptual fit for the perspectives regarding intimacy and sexuality post-cancer. Factor 1, entitled “communication – dispelling myths about sex and intimacy” positions communication as central to the acceptance of a range of satisfying sexual and intimate practices post-cancer. Factor 2, “valuing sexuality across the cancer journey,” centres on the theme of normalizing the experience of sex after cancer through the renegotiation of sex and intimacy: the development of alternative sexual practices. Factor 3, “intimacy beyond sex,” presents the view that even though sex may not be wanted, desired, or even possible following cancer, quality of life and relationship satisfaction are achieved through communication and non-genital intimacy. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated the complexity of perspectives about sexuality and intimacy post cancer, which has practical implications for those working in cancer care and survivorship. Therapists and other health professionals can play an important role in ameliorating concerns surrounding sexual wellbeing after cancer, by opening and facilitating discussion of sexuality and intimacy amongst couples affected by cancer, as well as providing information that normalizes a range of sexual and intimate practices. BioMed Central 2013-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3673866/ /pubmed/23725590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-270 Text en Copyright © 2013 Perz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perz, Janette
Ussher, Jane M
Gilbert, Emilee
Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals
title Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals
title_full Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals
title_fullStr Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals
title_full_unstemmed Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals
title_short Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals
title_sort constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-270
work_keys_str_mv AT perzjanette constructionsofsexandintimacyaftercancerqmethodologystudyofpeoplewithcancertheirpartnersandhealthprofessionals
AT ussherjanem constructionsofsexandintimacyaftercancerqmethodologystudyofpeoplewithcancertheirpartnersandhealthprofessionals
AT gilbertemilee constructionsofsexandintimacyaftercancerqmethodologystudyofpeoplewithcancertheirpartnersandhealthprofessionals