Cargando…

Implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units

BACKGROUND: To determine hand hygiene compliance before and after an intervention campaign in critical care units, this study was carried out in the Intensive care unit (ICU), Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Burns unit (BU) and the Kidney unit of the King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazi, Waleed, Senok, Abiola C, Al-Kahldy, Sameera, Abdullah, Diaa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23673017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-15
_version_ 1782272293930532864
author Mazi, Waleed
Senok, Abiola C
Al-Kahldy, Sameera
Abdullah, Diaa
author_facet Mazi, Waleed
Senok, Abiola C
Al-Kahldy, Sameera
Abdullah, Diaa
author_sort Mazi, Waleed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine hand hygiene compliance before and after an intervention campaign in critical care units, this study was carried out in the Intensive care unit (ICU), Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Burns unit (BU) and the Kidney unit of the King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia. The observation using the WHO hand hygiene protocol took place in four phases with phase I, between April 24-May 06 2010 and phase II from May 29-June 09 2010. An educational intervention took place between the Phases I and II. Follow-up Phases III and IV were from 01–15 October 2010 and 15–30 March 2011 respectively. FINDINGS: 1,975 hand hygiene opportunities comprising of 409 in Phase I, 406 in Phase II, 620 in Phase III and 540 Phase IV were observed. Compliance rate was 67% pre-intervention, 81% in phase II, declining to 59% and 65% in phases III and IV. Increased compliance in the ICU from 39% in Phase I to 81% in Phase IV (p < 0.05) was sustained throughout the study. Highest compliance rates were recorded among nurses in all phases. The improved compliance for physicians observed in the post-intervention phase was lost in follow-up phases. Missed opportunities for hand hygiene were before patient contact, after touching patient’s surrounding and before aseptic techniques. Team-work and leadership were identified as enhancing factors for compliance. CONCLUSION: The WHO hand hygiene strategy combined with health education, continuous evaluation and team approach resulted in increased compliance but this was not sustained in certain critical care areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3673893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36738932013-06-06 Implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units Mazi, Waleed Senok, Abiola C Al-Kahldy, Sameera Abdullah, Diaa Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Short Report BACKGROUND: To determine hand hygiene compliance before and after an intervention campaign in critical care units, this study was carried out in the Intensive care unit (ICU), Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Burns unit (BU) and the Kidney unit of the King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia. The observation using the WHO hand hygiene protocol took place in four phases with phase I, between April 24-May 06 2010 and phase II from May 29-June 09 2010. An educational intervention took place between the Phases I and II. Follow-up Phases III and IV were from 01–15 October 2010 and 15–30 March 2011 respectively. FINDINGS: 1,975 hand hygiene opportunities comprising of 409 in Phase I, 406 in Phase II, 620 in Phase III and 540 Phase IV were observed. Compliance rate was 67% pre-intervention, 81% in phase II, declining to 59% and 65% in phases III and IV. Increased compliance in the ICU from 39% in Phase I to 81% in Phase IV (p < 0.05) was sustained throughout the study. Highest compliance rates were recorded among nurses in all phases. The improved compliance for physicians observed in the post-intervention phase was lost in follow-up phases. Missed opportunities for hand hygiene were before patient contact, after touching patient’s surrounding and before aseptic techniques. Team-work and leadership were identified as enhancing factors for compliance. CONCLUSION: The WHO hand hygiene strategy combined with health education, continuous evaluation and team approach resulted in increased compliance but this was not sustained in certain critical care areas. BioMed Central 2013-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3673893/ /pubmed/23673017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-15 Text en Copyright © 2013 Mazi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Mazi, Waleed
Senok, Abiola C
Al-Kahldy, Sameera
Abdullah, Diaa
Implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units
title Implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units
title_full Implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units
title_fullStr Implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units
title_short Implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units
title_sort implementation of the world health organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in critical care units
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23673017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-15
work_keys_str_mv AT maziwaleed implementationoftheworldhealthorganizationhandhygieneimprovementstrategyincriticalcareunits
AT senokabiolac implementationoftheworldhealthorganizationhandhygieneimprovementstrategyincriticalcareunits
AT alkahldysameera implementationoftheworldhealthorganizationhandhygieneimprovementstrategyincriticalcareunits
AT abdullahdiaa implementationoftheworldhealthorganizationhandhygieneimprovementstrategyincriticalcareunits