Cargando…

The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study

BACKGROUND: Caesarean delivery (CD) rates are commonly used as an indicator of quality in obstetric care and risk adjustment evaluation is recommended to assess inter-institutional variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) can be used in cas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maso, Gianpaolo, Alberico, Salvatore, Monasta, Lorenzo, Ronfani, Luca, Montico, Marcella, Businelli, Caterina, Soini, Valentina, Piccoli, Monica, Gigli, Carmine, Domini, Daniele, Fiscella, Claudio, Casarsa, Sara, Zompicchiatti, Carlo, De Agostinis, Michela, D'Atri, Attilio, Mugittu, Raffaela, La Valle, Santo, Di Leonardo, Cristina, Adamo, Valter, Smiroldo, Silvia, Frate, Giovanni Del, Olivuzzi, Monica, Giove, Silvio, Parente, Maria, Bassini, Daniele, Melazzini, Simona, Guaschino, Secondo, De Seta, Francesco, Demarini, Sergio, Travan, Laura, Marchesoni, Diego, Rossi, Alberto, Simon, Giorgio, Zicari, Sandro, Tamburlini, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062364
_version_ 1782272317036953600
author Maso, Gianpaolo
Alberico, Salvatore
Monasta, Lorenzo
Ronfani, Luca
Montico, Marcella
Businelli, Caterina
Soini, Valentina
Piccoli, Monica
Gigli, Carmine
Domini, Daniele
Fiscella, Claudio
Casarsa, Sara
Zompicchiatti, Carlo
De Agostinis, Michela
D'Atri, Attilio
Mugittu, Raffaela
La Valle, Santo
Di Leonardo, Cristina
Adamo, Valter
Smiroldo, Silvia
Frate, Giovanni Del
Olivuzzi, Monica
Giove, Silvio
Parente, Maria
Bassini, Daniele
Melazzini, Simona
Guaschino, Secondo
De Seta, Francesco
Demarini, Sergio
Travan, Laura
Marchesoni, Diego
Rossi, Alberto
Simon, Giorgio
Zicari, Sandro
Tamburlini, Giorgio
author_facet Maso, Gianpaolo
Alberico, Salvatore
Monasta, Lorenzo
Ronfani, Luca
Montico, Marcella
Businelli, Caterina
Soini, Valentina
Piccoli, Monica
Gigli, Carmine
Domini, Daniele
Fiscella, Claudio
Casarsa, Sara
Zompicchiatti, Carlo
De Agostinis, Michela
D'Atri, Attilio
Mugittu, Raffaela
La Valle, Santo
Di Leonardo, Cristina
Adamo, Valter
Smiroldo, Silvia
Frate, Giovanni Del
Olivuzzi, Monica
Giove, Silvio
Parente, Maria
Bassini, Daniele
Melazzini, Simona
Guaschino, Secondo
De Seta, Francesco
Demarini, Sergio
Travan, Laura
Marchesoni, Diego
Rossi, Alberto
Simon, Giorgio
Zicari, Sandro
Tamburlini, Giorgio
author_sort Maso, Gianpaolo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean delivery (CD) rates are commonly used as an indicator of quality in obstetric care and risk adjustment evaluation is recommended to assess inter-institutional variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) can be used in case-mix adjustment. METHODS: Standardized data on 15,255 deliveries from 11 different regional centers were prospectively collected. Crude Risk Ratios of CDs were calculated for each center. Two multiple logistic regression models were herein considered by using: Model 1- maternal (age, Body Mass Index), obstetric variables (gestational age, fetal presentation, single or multiple, previous scar, parity, neonatal birth weight) and presence of risk factors; Model 2- TGCS either with or without maternal characteristics and presence of risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves of the multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each model. The null hypothesis that Areas under ROC Curve (AUC) were not different from each other was verified with a Chi Square test and post hoc pairwise comparisons by using a Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Crude evaluation of CD rates showed all centers had significantly higher Risk Ratios than the referent. Both multiple logistic regression models reduced these variations. However the two methods ranked institutions differently: model 1 and model 2 (adjusted for TGCS) identified respectively nine and eight centers with significantly higher CD rates than the referent with slightly different AUCs (0.8758 and 0.8929 respectively). In the adjusted model for TGCS and maternal characteristics/presence of risk factors, three centers had CD rates similar to the referent with the best AUC (0.9024). CONCLUSIONS: The TGCS might be considered as a reliable variable to adjust CD rates. The addition of maternal characteristics and risk factors to TGCS substantially increase the predictive discrimination of the risk adjusted model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3674002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36740022013-06-10 The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study Maso, Gianpaolo Alberico, Salvatore Monasta, Lorenzo Ronfani, Luca Montico, Marcella Businelli, Caterina Soini, Valentina Piccoli, Monica Gigli, Carmine Domini, Daniele Fiscella, Claudio Casarsa, Sara Zompicchiatti, Carlo De Agostinis, Michela D'Atri, Attilio Mugittu, Raffaela La Valle, Santo Di Leonardo, Cristina Adamo, Valter Smiroldo, Silvia Frate, Giovanni Del Olivuzzi, Monica Giove, Silvio Parente, Maria Bassini, Daniele Melazzini, Simona Guaschino, Secondo De Seta, Francesco Demarini, Sergio Travan, Laura Marchesoni, Diego Rossi, Alberto Simon, Giorgio Zicari, Sandro Tamburlini, Giorgio PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean delivery (CD) rates are commonly used as an indicator of quality in obstetric care and risk adjustment evaluation is recommended to assess inter-institutional variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) can be used in case-mix adjustment. METHODS: Standardized data on 15,255 deliveries from 11 different regional centers were prospectively collected. Crude Risk Ratios of CDs were calculated for each center. Two multiple logistic regression models were herein considered by using: Model 1- maternal (age, Body Mass Index), obstetric variables (gestational age, fetal presentation, single or multiple, previous scar, parity, neonatal birth weight) and presence of risk factors; Model 2- TGCS either with or without maternal characteristics and presence of risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves of the multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each model. The null hypothesis that Areas under ROC Curve (AUC) were not different from each other was verified with a Chi Square test and post hoc pairwise comparisons by using a Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Crude evaluation of CD rates showed all centers had significantly higher Risk Ratios than the referent. Both multiple logistic regression models reduced these variations. However the two methods ranked institutions differently: model 1 and model 2 (adjusted for TGCS) identified respectively nine and eight centers with significantly higher CD rates than the referent with slightly different AUCs (0.8758 and 0.8929 respectively). In the adjusted model for TGCS and maternal characteristics/presence of risk factors, three centers had CD rates similar to the referent with the best AUC (0.9024). CONCLUSIONS: The TGCS might be considered as a reliable variable to adjust CD rates. The addition of maternal characteristics and risk factors to TGCS substantially increase the predictive discrimination of the risk adjusted model. Public Library of Science 2013-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3674002/ /pubmed/23755097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062364 Text en © 2013 Maso et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maso, Gianpaolo
Alberico, Salvatore
Monasta, Lorenzo
Ronfani, Luca
Montico, Marcella
Businelli, Caterina
Soini, Valentina
Piccoli, Monica
Gigli, Carmine
Domini, Daniele
Fiscella, Claudio
Casarsa, Sara
Zompicchiatti, Carlo
De Agostinis, Michela
D'Atri, Attilio
Mugittu, Raffaela
La Valle, Santo
Di Leonardo, Cristina
Adamo, Valter
Smiroldo, Silvia
Frate, Giovanni Del
Olivuzzi, Monica
Giove, Silvio
Parente, Maria
Bassini, Daniele
Melazzini, Simona
Guaschino, Secondo
De Seta, Francesco
Demarini, Sergio
Travan, Laura
Marchesoni, Diego
Rossi, Alberto
Simon, Giorgio
Zicari, Sandro
Tamburlini, Giorgio
The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study
title The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study
title_full The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study
title_fullStr The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study
title_short The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study
title_sort application of the ten group classification system (tgcs) in caesarean delivery case mix adjustment. a multicenter prospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062364
work_keys_str_mv AT masogianpaolo theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT albericosalvatore theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT monastalorenzo theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT ronfaniluca theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT monticomarcella theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT businellicaterina theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT soinivalentina theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT piccolimonica theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT giglicarmine theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT dominidaniele theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT fiscellaclaudio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT casarsasara theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT zompicchiatticarlo theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT deagostinismichela theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT datriattilio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT mugitturaffaela theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT lavallesanto theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT dileonardocristina theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT adamovalter theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT smiroldosilvia theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT frategiovannidel theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT olivuzzimonica theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT giovesilvio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT parentemaria theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT bassinidaniele theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT melazzinisimona theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT guaschinosecondo theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT desetafrancesco theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT demarinisergio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT travanlaura theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT marchesonidiego theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT rossialberto theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT simongiorgio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT zicarisandro theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT tamburlinigiorgio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT masogianpaolo applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT albericosalvatore applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT monastalorenzo applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT ronfaniluca applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT monticomarcella applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT businellicaterina applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT soinivalentina applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT piccolimonica applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT giglicarmine applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT dominidaniele applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT fiscellaclaudio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT casarsasara applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT zompicchiatticarlo applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT deagostinismichela applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT datriattilio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT mugitturaffaela applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT lavallesanto applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT dileonardocristina applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT adamovalter applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT smiroldosilvia applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT frategiovannidel applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT olivuzzimonica applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT giovesilvio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT parentemaria applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT bassinidaniele applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT melazzinisimona applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT guaschinosecondo applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT desetafrancesco applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT demarinisergio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT travanlaura applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT marchesonidiego applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT rossialberto applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT simongiorgio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT zicarisandro applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy
AT tamburlinigiorgio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy