Cargando…
The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study
BACKGROUND: Caesarean delivery (CD) rates are commonly used as an indicator of quality in obstetric care and risk adjustment evaluation is recommended to assess inter-institutional variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) can be used in cas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062364 |
_version_ | 1782272317036953600 |
---|---|
author | Maso, Gianpaolo Alberico, Salvatore Monasta, Lorenzo Ronfani, Luca Montico, Marcella Businelli, Caterina Soini, Valentina Piccoli, Monica Gigli, Carmine Domini, Daniele Fiscella, Claudio Casarsa, Sara Zompicchiatti, Carlo De Agostinis, Michela D'Atri, Attilio Mugittu, Raffaela La Valle, Santo Di Leonardo, Cristina Adamo, Valter Smiroldo, Silvia Frate, Giovanni Del Olivuzzi, Monica Giove, Silvio Parente, Maria Bassini, Daniele Melazzini, Simona Guaschino, Secondo De Seta, Francesco Demarini, Sergio Travan, Laura Marchesoni, Diego Rossi, Alberto Simon, Giorgio Zicari, Sandro Tamburlini, Giorgio |
author_facet | Maso, Gianpaolo Alberico, Salvatore Monasta, Lorenzo Ronfani, Luca Montico, Marcella Businelli, Caterina Soini, Valentina Piccoli, Monica Gigli, Carmine Domini, Daniele Fiscella, Claudio Casarsa, Sara Zompicchiatti, Carlo De Agostinis, Michela D'Atri, Attilio Mugittu, Raffaela La Valle, Santo Di Leonardo, Cristina Adamo, Valter Smiroldo, Silvia Frate, Giovanni Del Olivuzzi, Monica Giove, Silvio Parente, Maria Bassini, Daniele Melazzini, Simona Guaschino, Secondo De Seta, Francesco Demarini, Sergio Travan, Laura Marchesoni, Diego Rossi, Alberto Simon, Giorgio Zicari, Sandro Tamburlini, Giorgio |
author_sort | Maso, Gianpaolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Caesarean delivery (CD) rates are commonly used as an indicator of quality in obstetric care and risk adjustment evaluation is recommended to assess inter-institutional variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) can be used in case-mix adjustment. METHODS: Standardized data on 15,255 deliveries from 11 different regional centers were prospectively collected. Crude Risk Ratios of CDs were calculated for each center. Two multiple logistic regression models were herein considered by using: Model 1- maternal (age, Body Mass Index), obstetric variables (gestational age, fetal presentation, single or multiple, previous scar, parity, neonatal birth weight) and presence of risk factors; Model 2- TGCS either with or without maternal characteristics and presence of risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves of the multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each model. The null hypothesis that Areas under ROC Curve (AUC) were not different from each other was verified with a Chi Square test and post hoc pairwise comparisons by using a Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Crude evaluation of CD rates showed all centers had significantly higher Risk Ratios than the referent. Both multiple logistic regression models reduced these variations. However the two methods ranked institutions differently: model 1 and model 2 (adjusted for TGCS) identified respectively nine and eight centers with significantly higher CD rates than the referent with slightly different AUCs (0.8758 and 0.8929 respectively). In the adjusted model for TGCS and maternal characteristics/presence of risk factors, three centers had CD rates similar to the referent with the best AUC (0.9024). CONCLUSIONS: The TGCS might be considered as a reliable variable to adjust CD rates. The addition of maternal characteristics and risk factors to TGCS substantially increase the predictive discrimination of the risk adjusted model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3674002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36740022013-06-10 The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study Maso, Gianpaolo Alberico, Salvatore Monasta, Lorenzo Ronfani, Luca Montico, Marcella Businelli, Caterina Soini, Valentina Piccoli, Monica Gigli, Carmine Domini, Daniele Fiscella, Claudio Casarsa, Sara Zompicchiatti, Carlo De Agostinis, Michela D'Atri, Attilio Mugittu, Raffaela La Valle, Santo Di Leonardo, Cristina Adamo, Valter Smiroldo, Silvia Frate, Giovanni Del Olivuzzi, Monica Giove, Silvio Parente, Maria Bassini, Daniele Melazzini, Simona Guaschino, Secondo De Seta, Francesco Demarini, Sergio Travan, Laura Marchesoni, Diego Rossi, Alberto Simon, Giorgio Zicari, Sandro Tamburlini, Giorgio PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean delivery (CD) rates are commonly used as an indicator of quality in obstetric care and risk adjustment evaluation is recommended to assess inter-institutional variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) can be used in case-mix adjustment. METHODS: Standardized data on 15,255 deliveries from 11 different regional centers were prospectively collected. Crude Risk Ratios of CDs were calculated for each center. Two multiple logistic regression models were herein considered by using: Model 1- maternal (age, Body Mass Index), obstetric variables (gestational age, fetal presentation, single or multiple, previous scar, parity, neonatal birth weight) and presence of risk factors; Model 2- TGCS either with or without maternal characteristics and presence of risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves of the multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each model. The null hypothesis that Areas under ROC Curve (AUC) were not different from each other was verified with a Chi Square test and post hoc pairwise comparisons by using a Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Crude evaluation of CD rates showed all centers had significantly higher Risk Ratios than the referent. Both multiple logistic regression models reduced these variations. However the two methods ranked institutions differently: model 1 and model 2 (adjusted for TGCS) identified respectively nine and eight centers with significantly higher CD rates than the referent with slightly different AUCs (0.8758 and 0.8929 respectively). In the adjusted model for TGCS and maternal characteristics/presence of risk factors, three centers had CD rates similar to the referent with the best AUC (0.9024). CONCLUSIONS: The TGCS might be considered as a reliable variable to adjust CD rates. The addition of maternal characteristics and risk factors to TGCS substantially increase the predictive discrimination of the risk adjusted model. Public Library of Science 2013-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3674002/ /pubmed/23755097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062364 Text en © 2013 Maso et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maso, Gianpaolo Alberico, Salvatore Monasta, Lorenzo Ronfani, Luca Montico, Marcella Businelli, Caterina Soini, Valentina Piccoli, Monica Gigli, Carmine Domini, Daniele Fiscella, Claudio Casarsa, Sara Zompicchiatti, Carlo De Agostinis, Michela D'Atri, Attilio Mugittu, Raffaela La Valle, Santo Di Leonardo, Cristina Adamo, Valter Smiroldo, Silvia Frate, Giovanni Del Olivuzzi, Monica Giove, Silvio Parente, Maria Bassini, Daniele Melazzini, Simona Guaschino, Secondo De Seta, Francesco Demarini, Sergio Travan, Laura Marchesoni, Diego Rossi, Alberto Simon, Giorgio Zicari, Sandro Tamburlini, Giorgio The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study |
title | The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study |
title_full | The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study |
title_fullStr | The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study |
title_short | The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study |
title_sort | application of the ten group classification system (tgcs) in caesarean delivery case mix adjustment. a multicenter prospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masogianpaolo theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT albericosalvatore theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT monastalorenzo theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT ronfaniluca theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT monticomarcella theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT businellicaterina theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT soinivalentina theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT piccolimonica theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT giglicarmine theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT dominidaniele theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT fiscellaclaudio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT casarsasara theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT zompicchiatticarlo theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT deagostinismichela theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT datriattilio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT mugitturaffaela theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT lavallesanto theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT dileonardocristina theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT adamovalter theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT smiroldosilvia theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT frategiovannidel theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT olivuzzimonica theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT giovesilvio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT parentemaria theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT bassinidaniele theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT melazzinisimona theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT guaschinosecondo theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT desetafrancesco theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT demarinisergio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT travanlaura theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT marchesonidiego theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT rossialberto theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT simongiorgio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT zicarisandro theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT tamburlinigiorgio theapplicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT masogianpaolo applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT albericosalvatore applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT monastalorenzo applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT ronfaniluca applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT monticomarcella applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT businellicaterina applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT soinivalentina applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT piccolimonica applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT giglicarmine applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT dominidaniele applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT fiscellaclaudio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT casarsasara applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT zompicchiatticarlo applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT deagostinismichela applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT datriattilio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT mugitturaffaela applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT lavallesanto applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT dileonardocristina applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT adamovalter applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT smiroldosilvia applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT frategiovannidel applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT olivuzzimonica applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT giovesilvio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT parentemaria applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT bassinidaniele applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT melazzinisimona applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT guaschinosecondo applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT desetafrancesco applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT demarinisergio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT travanlaura applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT marchesonidiego applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT rossialberto applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT simongiorgio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT zicarisandro applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy AT tamburlinigiorgio applicationofthetengroupclassificationsystemtgcsincaesareandeliverycasemixadjustmentamulticenterprospectivestudy |