Cargando…
Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure
AIM: The aim of this study was to establish the construct validity of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS(©)),a tool designed to measure changes in communication skills in preschool children. METHOD: Participating families' children (n=97; 68 males, 29 females; mean age...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23461266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12123 |
_version_ | 1782272381656498176 |
---|---|
author | Thomas-Stonell, Nancy Oddson, Bruce Robertson, Bernadette Rosenbaum, Peter |
author_facet | Thomas-Stonell, Nancy Oddson, Bruce Robertson, Bernadette Rosenbaum, Peter |
author_sort | Thomas-Stonell, Nancy |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this study was to establish the construct validity of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS(©)),a tool designed to measure changes in communication skills in preschool children. METHOD: Participating families' children (n=97; 68 males, 29 females; mean age 2y 8mo; SD 1.04y, range 10mo–4y 11mo) were recruited through eight Canadian organizations. The children were on a waiting list for speech and language intervention. Parents completed the Ages and Stages Questionnaire – Social/Emotional (ASQ-SE) and the FOCUS three times: at assessment and at the start and end of treatment. A second sample (n=28; 16 males 12 females) was recruited from another organization to correlate the FOCUS scores with speech, intelligibility and language measures. Second sample participants ranged in age from 3 years 1 month to 4 years 9 months (mean 3y 11mo; SD 0.41y). At the start and end of treatment, children were videotaped to obtain speech and language samples. Parents and speech–language pathologists (SLPs) independently completed the FOCUS tool. SLPs who were blind to the pre/post order of the videotapes analysed the samples. RESULTS: The FOCUS measured significantly more change (p<0.01) during treatment than during the waiting list period. It demonstrated both convergent and discriminant validity against the ASQ-SE. The FOCUS change corresponded to change measured by a combination of clinical speech and language measures (κ=0.31, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The FOCUS shows strong construct validity as a change-detecting instrument. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3674528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36745282013-06-06 Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure Thomas-Stonell, Nancy Oddson, Bruce Robertson, Bernadette Rosenbaum, Peter Dev Med Child Neurol Original Articles AIM: The aim of this study was to establish the construct validity of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS(©)),a tool designed to measure changes in communication skills in preschool children. METHOD: Participating families' children (n=97; 68 males, 29 females; mean age 2y 8mo; SD 1.04y, range 10mo–4y 11mo) were recruited through eight Canadian organizations. The children were on a waiting list for speech and language intervention. Parents completed the Ages and Stages Questionnaire – Social/Emotional (ASQ-SE) and the FOCUS three times: at assessment and at the start and end of treatment. A second sample (n=28; 16 males 12 females) was recruited from another organization to correlate the FOCUS scores with speech, intelligibility and language measures. Second sample participants ranged in age from 3 years 1 month to 4 years 9 months (mean 3y 11mo; SD 0.41y). At the start and end of treatment, children were videotaped to obtain speech and language samples. Parents and speech–language pathologists (SLPs) independently completed the FOCUS tool. SLPs who were blind to the pre/post order of the videotapes analysed the samples. RESULTS: The FOCUS measured significantly more change (p<0.01) during treatment than during the waiting list period. It demonstrated both convergent and discriminant validity against the ASQ-SE. The FOCUS change corresponded to change measured by a combination of clinical speech and language measures (κ=0.31, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The FOCUS shows strong construct validity as a change-detecting instrument. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-06 2013-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3674528/ /pubmed/23461266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12123 Text en Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology © 2013 Mac Keith Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Thomas-Stonell, Nancy Oddson, Bruce Robertson, Bernadette Rosenbaum, Peter Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure |
title | Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure |
title_full | Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure |
title_short | Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure |
title_sort | validation of the focus on the outcomes of communication under six outcome measure |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23461266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasstonellnancy validationofthefocusontheoutcomesofcommunicationundersixoutcomemeasure AT oddsonbruce validationofthefocusontheoutcomesofcommunicationundersixoutcomemeasure AT robertsonbernadette validationofthefocusontheoutcomesofcommunicationundersixoutcomemeasure AT rosenbaumpeter validationofthefocusontheoutcomesofcommunicationundersixoutcomemeasure |