Cargando…
Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?
Although renal biopsy is the most accurate way of assessing renal inflammation in patients with lupus nephritis (LN), the technique is invasive and cannot be performed frequently. Currently used blood and urine biomarkers have limited utility in monitoring the activity of nephritis. In a previous is...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23256781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4098 |
_version_ | 1782272389722144768 |
---|---|
author | Rahman, Anisur |
author_facet | Rahman, Anisur |
author_sort | Rahman, Anisur |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although renal biopsy is the most accurate way of assessing renal inflammation in patients with lupus nephritis (LN), the technique is invasive and cannot be performed frequently. Currently used blood and urine biomarkers have limited utility in monitoring the activity of nephritis. In a previous issue of Arthritis Research and Therapy, Singh and colleagues showed that measuring urinary levels of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 could be useful in both diagnosing and monitoring LN. These levels are higher in patients with lupus than controls, are higher in lupus patients who have active renal disease compared with those who do not, and correlate significantly with the histological activity index in renal biopsies of patients with LN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3674604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36746042013-06-19 Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? Rahman, Anisur Arthritis Res Ther Editorial Although renal biopsy is the most accurate way of assessing renal inflammation in patients with lupus nephritis (LN), the technique is invasive and cannot be performed frequently. Currently used blood and urine biomarkers have limited utility in monitoring the activity of nephritis. In a previous issue of Arthritis Research and Therapy, Singh and colleagues showed that measuring urinary levels of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 could be useful in both diagnosing and monitoring LN. These levels are higher in patients with lupus than controls, are higher in lupus patients who have active renal disease compared with those who do not, and correlate significantly with the histological activity index in renal biopsies of patients with LN. BioMed Central 2012 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3674604/ /pubmed/23256781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4098 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Editorial Rahman, Anisur Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? |
title | Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? |
title_full | Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? |
title_fullStr | Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? |
title_short | Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? |
title_sort | can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23256781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rahmananisur canmeasuringurinarybiomarkersimprovethemanagementoflupusnephritis |