Cargando…

Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?

Although renal biopsy is the most accurate way of assessing renal inflammation in patients with lupus nephritis (LN), the technique is invasive and cannot be performed frequently. Currently used blood and urine biomarkers have limited utility in monitoring the activity of nephritis. In a previous is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rahman, Anisur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23256781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4098
_version_ 1782272389722144768
author Rahman, Anisur
author_facet Rahman, Anisur
author_sort Rahman, Anisur
collection PubMed
description Although renal biopsy is the most accurate way of assessing renal inflammation in patients with lupus nephritis (LN), the technique is invasive and cannot be performed frequently. Currently used blood and urine biomarkers have limited utility in monitoring the activity of nephritis. In a previous issue of Arthritis Research and Therapy, Singh and colleagues showed that measuring urinary levels of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 could be useful in both diagnosing and monitoring LN. These levels are higher in patients with lupus than controls, are higher in lupus patients who have active renal disease compared with those who do not, and correlate significantly with the histological activity index in renal biopsies of patients with LN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3674604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36746042013-06-19 Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis? Rahman, Anisur Arthritis Res Ther Editorial Although renal biopsy is the most accurate way of assessing renal inflammation in patients with lupus nephritis (LN), the technique is invasive and cannot be performed frequently. Currently used blood and urine biomarkers have limited utility in monitoring the activity of nephritis. In a previous issue of Arthritis Research and Therapy, Singh and colleagues showed that measuring urinary levels of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 could be useful in both diagnosing and monitoring LN. These levels are higher in patients with lupus than controls, are higher in lupus patients who have active renal disease compared with those who do not, and correlate significantly with the histological activity index in renal biopsies of patients with LN. BioMed Central 2012 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3674604/ /pubmed/23256781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4098 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Editorial
Rahman, Anisur
Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?
title Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?
title_full Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?
title_fullStr Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?
title_full_unstemmed Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?
title_short Can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?
title_sort can measuring urinary biomarkers improve the management of lupus nephritis?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23256781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4098
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmananisur canmeasuringurinarybiomarkersimprovethemanagementoflupusnephritis