Cargando…

A Cross-Species Study of Gesture and Its Role in Symbolic Development: Implications for the Gestural Theory of Language Evolution

Using a naturalistic video database, we examined whether gestures scaffold the symbolic development of a language-enculturated chimpanzee, a language-enculturated bonobo, and a human child during the second year of life. These three species constitute a complete clade: species possessing a common im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillespie-Lynch, K., Greenfield, P. M., Feng, Y., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Lyn, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00160
_version_ 1782272440598003712
author Gillespie-Lynch, K.
Greenfield, P. M.
Feng, Y.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S.
Lyn, H.
author_facet Gillespie-Lynch, K.
Greenfield, P. M.
Feng, Y.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S.
Lyn, H.
author_sort Gillespie-Lynch, K.
collection PubMed
description Using a naturalistic video database, we examined whether gestures scaffold the symbolic development of a language-enculturated chimpanzee, a language-enculturated bonobo, and a human child during the second year of life. These three species constitute a complete clade: species possessing a common immediate ancestor. A basic finding was the functional and formal similarity of many gestures between chimpanzee, bonobo, and human child. The child’s symbols were spoken words; the apes’ symbols were lexigrams – non-iconic visual signifiers. A developmental pattern in which gestural representation of a referent preceded symbolic representation of the same referent appeared in all three species (but was statistically significant only for the child). Nonetheless, across species, the ratio of symbol to gesture increased significantly with age. But even though their symbol production increased, the apes continued to communicate more frequently by gesture than by symbol. In contrast, by 15–18 months of age, the child used symbols more frequently than gestures. This ontogenetic sequence from gesture to symbol, present across the clade but more pronounced in child than ape, provides support for the role of gesture in language evolution. In all three species, the overwhelming majority of gestures were communicative (i.e., paired with eye contact, vocalization, and/or persistence). However, vocalization was rare for the apes, but accompanied the majority of the child’s communicative gestures. This species difference suggests the co-evolution of speech and gesture after the evolutionary divergence of the hominid line. Multimodal expressions of communicative intent (e.g., vocalization plus persistence) were normative for the child, but less common for the apes. This species difference suggests that multimodal expression of communicative intent was also strengthened after hominids diverged from apes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3674957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36749572013-06-07 A Cross-Species Study of Gesture and Its Role in Symbolic Development: Implications for the Gestural Theory of Language Evolution Gillespie-Lynch, K. Greenfield, P. M. Feng, Y. Savage-Rumbaugh, S. Lyn, H. Front Psychol Psychology Using a naturalistic video database, we examined whether gestures scaffold the symbolic development of a language-enculturated chimpanzee, a language-enculturated bonobo, and a human child during the second year of life. These three species constitute a complete clade: species possessing a common immediate ancestor. A basic finding was the functional and formal similarity of many gestures between chimpanzee, bonobo, and human child. The child’s symbols were spoken words; the apes’ symbols were lexigrams – non-iconic visual signifiers. A developmental pattern in which gestural representation of a referent preceded symbolic representation of the same referent appeared in all three species (but was statistically significant only for the child). Nonetheless, across species, the ratio of symbol to gesture increased significantly with age. But even though their symbol production increased, the apes continued to communicate more frequently by gesture than by symbol. In contrast, by 15–18 months of age, the child used symbols more frequently than gestures. This ontogenetic sequence from gesture to symbol, present across the clade but more pronounced in child than ape, provides support for the role of gesture in language evolution. In all three species, the overwhelming majority of gestures were communicative (i.e., paired with eye contact, vocalization, and/or persistence). However, vocalization was rare for the apes, but accompanied the majority of the child’s communicative gestures. This species difference suggests the co-evolution of speech and gesture after the evolutionary divergence of the hominid line. Multimodal expressions of communicative intent (e.g., vocalization plus persistence) were normative for the child, but less common for the apes. This species difference suggests that multimodal expression of communicative intent was also strengthened after hominids diverged from apes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3674957/ /pubmed/23750140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00160 Text en Copyright © 2013 Gillespie-Lynch, Greenfield, Feng, Savage-Rumbaugh and Lyn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Gillespie-Lynch, K.
Greenfield, P. M.
Feng, Y.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S.
Lyn, H.
A Cross-Species Study of Gesture and Its Role in Symbolic Development: Implications for the Gestural Theory of Language Evolution
title A Cross-Species Study of Gesture and Its Role in Symbolic Development: Implications for the Gestural Theory of Language Evolution
title_full A Cross-Species Study of Gesture and Its Role in Symbolic Development: Implications for the Gestural Theory of Language Evolution
title_fullStr A Cross-Species Study of Gesture and Its Role in Symbolic Development: Implications for the Gestural Theory of Language Evolution
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-Species Study of Gesture and Its Role in Symbolic Development: Implications for the Gestural Theory of Language Evolution
title_short A Cross-Species Study of Gesture and Its Role in Symbolic Development: Implications for the Gestural Theory of Language Evolution
title_sort cross-species study of gesture and its role in symbolic development: implications for the gestural theory of language evolution
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00160
work_keys_str_mv AT gillespielynchk acrossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT greenfieldpm acrossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT fengy acrossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT savagerumbaughs acrossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT lynh acrossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT gillespielynchk crossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT greenfieldpm crossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT fengy crossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT savagerumbaughs crossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution
AT lynh crossspeciesstudyofgestureanditsroleinsymbolicdevelopmentimplicationsforthegesturaltheoryoflanguageevolution