Cargando…

Magnetoencephalographic Study on Forward Suppression by Ipsilateral, Contralateral, and Binaural Maskers

When two tones are presented in a short time interval, the response to the second tone is suppressed. This phenomenon is referred to as forward suppression. To address the effect of the masker laterality on forward suppression, magnetoencephalographic responses were investigated for eight subjects w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishimura, Tadashi, Uratani, Yuka, Okayasu, Tadao, Nakagawa, Seiji, Hosoi, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066225
_version_ 1782272486951354368
author Nishimura, Tadashi
Uratani, Yuka
Okayasu, Tadao
Nakagawa, Seiji
Hosoi, Hiroshi
author_facet Nishimura, Tadashi
Uratani, Yuka
Okayasu, Tadao
Nakagawa, Seiji
Hosoi, Hiroshi
author_sort Nishimura, Tadashi
collection PubMed
description When two tones are presented in a short time interval, the response to the second tone is suppressed. This phenomenon is referred to as forward suppression. To address the effect of the masker laterality on forward suppression, magnetoencephalographic responses were investigated for eight subjects with normal hearing when the preceding maskers were presented ipsilaterally, contralaterally, and binaurally. We employed three masker intensity conditions: the ipsilateral-strong, left-right-balanced, and contralateral-strong conditions. Regarding the responses to the maskers without signal, the N1m amplitude evoked by the left and binaural maskers was significantly larger than that evoked by the right masker for the left-strong and left-right-balanced conditions. No significant difference was observed for the right-strong condition. Regarding the subsequent N1m amplitudes, they were attenuated by the presence of the left, binaural, and right maskers for all conditions. For the left- and right-strong conditions, the subsequent N1m amplitude in the presence of the left masker was smaller than those of the binaural and right maskers. No difference was observed between the binaural and right masker presentation. For left-right-balanced condition, the subsequent N1m amplitude decreased in the presence of the right, binaural, and left maskers in that order. If the preceding activity reflected the ability to suppress the subsequent activity, the forward suppression by the left masker would be superior to that by the right masker for the left-strong and left-right-balanced conditions. Furthermore, the forward suppression by the binaural masker would be expected to be superior to that by the left masker owing to additional afferent activity from the right ear. Thus, the current results suggest that the forward suppression by ipsilateral maskers is superior to that by contralateral maskers although both maskers evoked the N1m amplitudes to the same degree. Additional masker at the contralateral ear can attenuate the forward suppression by the ipsilateral masker.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3675151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36751512013-06-12 Magnetoencephalographic Study on Forward Suppression by Ipsilateral, Contralateral, and Binaural Maskers Nishimura, Tadashi Uratani, Yuka Okayasu, Tadao Nakagawa, Seiji Hosoi, Hiroshi PLoS One Research Article When two tones are presented in a short time interval, the response to the second tone is suppressed. This phenomenon is referred to as forward suppression. To address the effect of the masker laterality on forward suppression, magnetoencephalographic responses were investigated for eight subjects with normal hearing when the preceding maskers were presented ipsilaterally, contralaterally, and binaurally. We employed three masker intensity conditions: the ipsilateral-strong, left-right-balanced, and contralateral-strong conditions. Regarding the responses to the maskers without signal, the N1m amplitude evoked by the left and binaural maskers was significantly larger than that evoked by the right masker for the left-strong and left-right-balanced conditions. No significant difference was observed for the right-strong condition. Regarding the subsequent N1m amplitudes, they were attenuated by the presence of the left, binaural, and right maskers for all conditions. For the left- and right-strong conditions, the subsequent N1m amplitude in the presence of the left masker was smaller than those of the binaural and right maskers. No difference was observed between the binaural and right masker presentation. For left-right-balanced condition, the subsequent N1m amplitude decreased in the presence of the right, binaural, and left maskers in that order. If the preceding activity reflected the ability to suppress the subsequent activity, the forward suppression by the left masker would be superior to that by the right masker for the left-strong and left-right-balanced conditions. Furthermore, the forward suppression by the binaural masker would be expected to be superior to that by the left masker owing to additional afferent activity from the right ear. Thus, the current results suggest that the forward suppression by ipsilateral maskers is superior to that by contralateral maskers although both maskers evoked the N1m amplitudes to the same degree. Additional masker at the contralateral ear can attenuate the forward suppression by the ipsilateral masker. Public Library of Science 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3675151/ /pubmed/23762482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066225 Text en © 2013 Nishimura et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nishimura, Tadashi
Uratani, Yuka
Okayasu, Tadao
Nakagawa, Seiji
Hosoi, Hiroshi
Magnetoencephalographic Study on Forward Suppression by Ipsilateral, Contralateral, and Binaural Maskers
title Magnetoencephalographic Study on Forward Suppression by Ipsilateral, Contralateral, and Binaural Maskers
title_full Magnetoencephalographic Study on Forward Suppression by Ipsilateral, Contralateral, and Binaural Maskers
title_fullStr Magnetoencephalographic Study on Forward Suppression by Ipsilateral, Contralateral, and Binaural Maskers
title_full_unstemmed Magnetoencephalographic Study on Forward Suppression by Ipsilateral, Contralateral, and Binaural Maskers
title_short Magnetoencephalographic Study on Forward Suppression by Ipsilateral, Contralateral, and Binaural Maskers
title_sort magnetoencephalographic study on forward suppression by ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural maskers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066225
work_keys_str_mv AT nishimuratadashi magnetoencephalographicstudyonforwardsuppressionbyipsilateralcontralateralandbinauralmaskers
AT urataniyuka magnetoencephalographicstudyonforwardsuppressionbyipsilateralcontralateralandbinauralmaskers
AT okayasutadao magnetoencephalographicstudyonforwardsuppressionbyipsilateralcontralateralandbinauralmaskers
AT nakagawaseiji magnetoencephalographicstudyonforwardsuppressionbyipsilateralcontralateralandbinauralmaskers
AT hosoihiroshi magnetoencephalographicstudyonforwardsuppressionbyipsilateralcontralateralandbinauralmaskers