Cargando…

Differences in Sepsis Treatment and Outcomes between Public and Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Multicenter Observational Study

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed higher sepsis mortality rates in Brazil compared to other developed or developing countries. Moreover, another trial demonstrated an increased mortality rate in public hospitals compared to private hospitals in Brazil. The reasons for these findings may include de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conde, Katia Aparecida Pessoa, Silva, Eliezer, Silva, Carla Oliveira, Ferreira, Elaine, Freitas, Flavio Geraldo Rezende, Castro, Isac, Rea-Neto, Alvaro, Grion, Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho, Moura, Anselmo Dornas, Lobo, Suzana Margareth, Azevedo, Luciano Cesar Pontes, Machado, Flavia Ribeiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064790
_version_ 1782272490401169408
author Conde, Katia Aparecida Pessoa
Silva, Eliezer
Silva, Carla Oliveira
Ferreira, Elaine
Freitas, Flavio Geraldo Rezende
Castro, Isac
Rea-Neto, Alvaro
Grion, Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho
Moura, Anselmo Dornas
Lobo, Suzana Margareth
Azevedo, Luciano Cesar Pontes
Machado, Flavia Ribeiro
author_facet Conde, Katia Aparecida Pessoa
Silva, Eliezer
Silva, Carla Oliveira
Ferreira, Elaine
Freitas, Flavio Geraldo Rezende
Castro, Isac
Rea-Neto, Alvaro
Grion, Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho
Moura, Anselmo Dornas
Lobo, Suzana Margareth
Azevedo, Luciano Cesar Pontes
Machado, Flavia Ribeiro
author_sort Conde, Katia Aparecida Pessoa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed higher sepsis mortality rates in Brazil compared to other developed or developing countries. Moreover, another trial demonstrated an increased mortality rate in public hospitals compared to private hospitals in Brazil. The reasons for these findings may include delayed recognition and inadequate treatment of sepsis in public facilities. We designed this study to evaluate the factors associated with mortality in septic patients admitted to intensive care units in a network of public and private institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of sepsis patients in 19 private and public institutions in Brazil. We analyzed data from the original database and collected additional data to assess compliance to the treatment guidelines and to determine the time from the onset of organ dysfunction and the sepsis diagnosis by the healthcare team. RESULTS: A total of 396 patients were analyzed. Patients in public hospitals were younger, had a greater number of dysfunctional organs at baseline and a lower chance to have sepsis diagnosed within two hours of the onset of organ dysfunction. Private hospitals had a better compliance to lactate and blood culture sampling and maintenance of glycemic control. The multivariate analysis showed that age, disease severity at baseline and being treated at a public hospital were independent risk factors for mortality. A delay in the sepsis diagnosis of longer than two hours was associated with mortality only in the public setting. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed a lower sepsis mortality rate in the private hospitals of this network. Being treated in a public hospital was an independent factor for mortality. Delayed recognition of sepsis was more frequent in public institutions and this might have been associated with a higher mortality. Improving sepsis recognition and early diagnosis may be important targets in public institutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3675193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36751932013-06-12 Differences in Sepsis Treatment and Outcomes between Public and Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Multicenter Observational Study Conde, Katia Aparecida Pessoa Silva, Eliezer Silva, Carla Oliveira Ferreira, Elaine Freitas, Flavio Geraldo Rezende Castro, Isac Rea-Neto, Alvaro Grion, Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho Moura, Anselmo Dornas Lobo, Suzana Margareth Azevedo, Luciano Cesar Pontes Machado, Flavia Ribeiro PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed higher sepsis mortality rates in Brazil compared to other developed or developing countries. Moreover, another trial demonstrated an increased mortality rate in public hospitals compared to private hospitals in Brazil. The reasons for these findings may include delayed recognition and inadequate treatment of sepsis in public facilities. We designed this study to evaluate the factors associated with mortality in septic patients admitted to intensive care units in a network of public and private institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of sepsis patients in 19 private and public institutions in Brazil. We analyzed data from the original database and collected additional data to assess compliance to the treatment guidelines and to determine the time from the onset of organ dysfunction and the sepsis diagnosis by the healthcare team. RESULTS: A total of 396 patients were analyzed. Patients in public hospitals were younger, had a greater number of dysfunctional organs at baseline and a lower chance to have sepsis diagnosed within two hours of the onset of organ dysfunction. Private hospitals had a better compliance to lactate and blood culture sampling and maintenance of glycemic control. The multivariate analysis showed that age, disease severity at baseline and being treated at a public hospital were independent risk factors for mortality. A delay in the sepsis diagnosis of longer than two hours was associated with mortality only in the public setting. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed a lower sepsis mortality rate in the private hospitals of this network. Being treated in a public hospital was an independent factor for mortality. Delayed recognition of sepsis was more frequent in public institutions and this might have been associated with a higher mortality. Improving sepsis recognition and early diagnosis may be important targets in public institutions. Public Library of Science 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3675193/ /pubmed/23762255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064790 Text en © 2013 Conde et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Conde, Katia Aparecida Pessoa
Silva, Eliezer
Silva, Carla Oliveira
Ferreira, Elaine
Freitas, Flavio Geraldo Rezende
Castro, Isac
Rea-Neto, Alvaro
Grion, Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho
Moura, Anselmo Dornas
Lobo, Suzana Margareth
Azevedo, Luciano Cesar Pontes
Machado, Flavia Ribeiro
Differences in Sepsis Treatment and Outcomes between Public and Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Multicenter Observational Study
title Differences in Sepsis Treatment and Outcomes between Public and Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_full Differences in Sepsis Treatment and Outcomes between Public and Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_fullStr Differences in Sepsis Treatment and Outcomes between Public and Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Sepsis Treatment and Outcomes between Public and Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_short Differences in Sepsis Treatment and Outcomes between Public and Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_sort differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in brazil: a multicenter observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064790
work_keys_str_mv AT condekatiaaparecidapessoa differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT silvaeliezer differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT silvacarlaoliveira differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT ferreiraelaine differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT freitasflaviogeraldorezende differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT castroisac differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT reanetoalvaro differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT grioncintiamagalhaescarvalho differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT mouraanselmodornas differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT lobosuzanamargareth differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT azevedolucianocesarpontes differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT machadoflaviaribeiro differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy