Cargando…

Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Various observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chun-Yan, Song, Bo, Wang, Ying-Yan, Meng, Hua, Guo, Shi-Bin, Liu, Li-Na, Lv, Hai-Chen, Wu, Qi-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065645
_version_ 1782272492241420288
author Li, Chun-Yan
Song, Bo
Wang, Ying-Yan
Meng, Hua
Guo, Shi-Bin
Liu, Li-Na
Lv, Hai-Chen
Wu, Qi-Jun
author_facet Li, Chun-Yan
Song, Bo
Wang, Ying-Yan
Meng, Hua
Guo, Shi-Bin
Liu, Li-Na
Lv, Hai-Chen
Wu, Qi-Jun
author_sort Li, Chun-Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiological studies. METHODS: After a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of menarcheal age and CRC risk published through the end of January 2013, we pooled the relative risks (RRs) from included studies using a fixed- or random-effects model and performed heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Eleven case-control and 11 cohort studies were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The random-effects pooled RR for oldest versus youngest menarcheal age was 0.95 [95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.85–1.06], with significant heterogeneity (Q = 61.03, P<0.001, I (2) = 65.6%). When separately analyzed, case-control (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.75–1.21) and cohort studies (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90–1.04) yielded similar results. Moreover, similar results were also observed among the subgroup analyses by study quality, population, exposure assessment, anatomic cancer site, subsite of colon cancer, and several potential important confounders and risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups detected by meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this meta-analysis demonstrated that menarcheal age was not associated with the risk of CRC in humans. Further studies are warranted to stratify results by the subsite of colon cancer and menopause status in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3675201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36752012013-06-12 Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Li, Chun-Yan Song, Bo Wang, Ying-Yan Meng, Hua Guo, Shi-Bin Liu, Li-Na Lv, Hai-Chen Wu, Qi-Jun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Various observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiological studies. METHODS: After a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of menarcheal age and CRC risk published through the end of January 2013, we pooled the relative risks (RRs) from included studies using a fixed- or random-effects model and performed heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Eleven case-control and 11 cohort studies were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The random-effects pooled RR for oldest versus youngest menarcheal age was 0.95 [95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.85–1.06], with significant heterogeneity (Q = 61.03, P<0.001, I (2) = 65.6%). When separately analyzed, case-control (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.75–1.21) and cohort studies (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90–1.04) yielded similar results. Moreover, similar results were also observed among the subgroup analyses by study quality, population, exposure assessment, anatomic cancer site, subsite of colon cancer, and several potential important confounders and risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups detected by meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this meta-analysis demonstrated that menarcheal age was not associated with the risk of CRC in humans. Further studies are warranted to stratify results by the subsite of colon cancer and menopause status in the future. Public Library of Science 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3675201/ /pubmed/23762403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065645 Text en © 2013 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Chun-Yan
Song, Bo
Wang, Ying-Yan
Meng, Hua
Guo, Shi-Bin
Liu, Li-Na
Lv, Hai-Chen
Wu, Qi-Jun
Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort age at menarche and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065645
work_keys_str_mv AT lichunyan ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT songbo ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT wangyingyan ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT menghua ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT guoshibin ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT liulina ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT lvhaichen ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT wuqijun ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis