Cargando…
Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Various observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiologica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065645 |
_version_ | 1782272492241420288 |
---|---|
author | Li, Chun-Yan Song, Bo Wang, Ying-Yan Meng, Hua Guo, Shi-Bin Liu, Li-Na Lv, Hai-Chen Wu, Qi-Jun |
author_facet | Li, Chun-Yan Song, Bo Wang, Ying-Yan Meng, Hua Guo, Shi-Bin Liu, Li-Na Lv, Hai-Chen Wu, Qi-Jun |
author_sort | Li, Chun-Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiological studies. METHODS: After a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of menarcheal age and CRC risk published through the end of January 2013, we pooled the relative risks (RRs) from included studies using a fixed- or random-effects model and performed heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Eleven case-control and 11 cohort studies were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The random-effects pooled RR for oldest versus youngest menarcheal age was 0.95 [95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.85–1.06], with significant heterogeneity (Q = 61.03, P<0.001, I (2) = 65.6%). When separately analyzed, case-control (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.75–1.21) and cohort studies (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90–1.04) yielded similar results. Moreover, similar results were also observed among the subgroup analyses by study quality, population, exposure assessment, anatomic cancer site, subsite of colon cancer, and several potential important confounders and risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups detected by meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this meta-analysis demonstrated that menarcheal age was not associated with the risk of CRC in humans. Further studies are warranted to stratify results by the subsite of colon cancer and menopause status in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3675201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36752012013-06-12 Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Li, Chun-Yan Song, Bo Wang, Ying-Yan Meng, Hua Guo, Shi-Bin Liu, Li-Na Lv, Hai-Chen Wu, Qi-Jun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Various observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiological studies. METHODS: After a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of menarcheal age and CRC risk published through the end of January 2013, we pooled the relative risks (RRs) from included studies using a fixed- or random-effects model and performed heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Eleven case-control and 11 cohort studies were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The random-effects pooled RR for oldest versus youngest menarcheal age was 0.95 [95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.85–1.06], with significant heterogeneity (Q = 61.03, P<0.001, I (2) = 65.6%). When separately analyzed, case-control (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.75–1.21) and cohort studies (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90–1.04) yielded similar results. Moreover, similar results were also observed among the subgroup analyses by study quality, population, exposure assessment, anatomic cancer site, subsite of colon cancer, and several potential important confounders and risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups detected by meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this meta-analysis demonstrated that menarcheal age was not associated with the risk of CRC in humans. Further studies are warranted to stratify results by the subsite of colon cancer and menopause status in the future. Public Library of Science 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3675201/ /pubmed/23762403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065645 Text en © 2013 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Chun-Yan Song, Bo Wang, Ying-Yan Meng, Hua Guo, Shi-Bin Liu, Li-Na Lv, Hai-Chen Wu, Qi-Jun Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | age at menarche and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichunyan ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT songbo ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT wangyingyan ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT menghua ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT guoshibin ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT liulina ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT lvhaichen ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT wuqijun ageatmenarcheandriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis |