Cargando…
Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of clinically and non-clinically relevant extra-spinal incidental findings (IF) in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine and to evaluate the rate of undetected findings in archived radiological reports. METHODS: A retrospectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23456750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0234-z |
_version_ | 1782272497762172928 |
---|---|
author | Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo Giona, Alessandro Di Martino, Alberto Corrado Errante, Yuri Scarciolla, Laura Mallio, Carlo Augusto Denaro, Vincenzo Zobel, Bruno Beomonte |
author_facet | Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo Giona, Alessandro Di Martino, Alberto Corrado Errante, Yuri Scarciolla, Laura Mallio, Carlo Augusto Denaro, Vincenzo Zobel, Bruno Beomonte |
author_sort | Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of clinically and non-clinically relevant extra-spinal incidental findings (IF) in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine and to evaluate the rate of undetected findings in archived radiological reports. METHODS: A retrospective search of patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI from January 2006 to December 2010 was conducted. By means of randomisation, we retrospectively reviewed 3,000 lumbar spine MRI examinations. Extra-spinal abnormalities were classified according to a modified CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS). We retrospectively compared our structured approach with the archived MRI reports as it regarded the detection of extra-spinal IF to estimate non-detection rates. RESULTS: By means of the structured approach used, extra-spinal findings were detected in 2,060 (68.6 %) of the 3,000 lumbar spine MRI examinations; 362 (17.6 %) patients had indeterminate or clinically important findings (E3 and E4) requiring clinical correlation or further evaluation. After review of the original archived radiological reports, potentially important C-RADS E3 and E4 extra-spinal IF were respectively reported in 47 of the 265 (17.7 %) and in 8 of 74 (10.8 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that incidental extra-spinal findings at conventional lumbar spine MRI are common but underestimated in radiological reports. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3675253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36752532013-06-10 Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo Giona, Alessandro Di Martino, Alberto Corrado Errante, Yuri Scarciolla, Laura Mallio, Carlo Augusto Denaro, Vincenzo Zobel, Bruno Beomonte Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of clinically and non-clinically relevant extra-spinal incidental findings (IF) in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine and to evaluate the rate of undetected findings in archived radiological reports. METHODS: A retrospective search of patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI from January 2006 to December 2010 was conducted. By means of randomisation, we retrospectively reviewed 3,000 lumbar spine MRI examinations. Extra-spinal abnormalities were classified according to a modified CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS). We retrospectively compared our structured approach with the archived MRI reports as it regarded the detection of extra-spinal IF to estimate non-detection rates. RESULTS: By means of the structured approach used, extra-spinal findings were detected in 2,060 (68.6 %) of the 3,000 lumbar spine MRI examinations; 362 (17.6 %) patients had indeterminate or clinically important findings (E3 and E4) requiring clinical correlation or further evaluation. After review of the original archived radiological reports, potentially important C-RADS E3 and E4 extra-spinal IF were respectively reported in 47 of the 265 (17.7 %) and in 8 of 74 (10.8 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that incidental extra-spinal findings at conventional lumbar spine MRI are common but underestimated in radiological reports. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3675253/ /pubmed/23456750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0234-z Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo Giona, Alessandro Di Martino, Alberto Corrado Errante, Yuri Scarciolla, Laura Mallio, Carlo Augusto Denaro, Vincenzo Zobel, Bruno Beomonte Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study |
title | Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study |
title_full | Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study |
title_fullStr | Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study |
title_short | Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study |
title_sort | extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine mri in the general population: a large cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23456750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0234-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quattrocchicarlocosimo extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy AT gionaalessandro extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy AT dimartinoalbertocorrado extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy AT erranteyuri extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy AT scarciollalaura extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy AT malliocarloaugusto extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy AT denarovincenzo extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy AT zobelbrunobeomonte extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy |