Cargando…

Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of clinically and non-clinically relevant extra-spinal incidental findings (IF) in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine and to evaluate the rate of undetected findings in archived radiological reports. METHODS: A retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo, Giona, Alessandro, Di Martino, Alberto Corrado, Errante, Yuri, Scarciolla, Laura, Mallio, Carlo Augusto, Denaro, Vincenzo, Zobel, Bruno Beomonte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23456750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0234-z
_version_ 1782272497762172928
author Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo
Giona, Alessandro
Di Martino, Alberto Corrado
Errante, Yuri
Scarciolla, Laura
Mallio, Carlo Augusto
Denaro, Vincenzo
Zobel, Bruno Beomonte
author_facet Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo
Giona, Alessandro
Di Martino, Alberto Corrado
Errante, Yuri
Scarciolla, Laura
Mallio, Carlo Augusto
Denaro, Vincenzo
Zobel, Bruno Beomonte
author_sort Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of clinically and non-clinically relevant extra-spinal incidental findings (IF) in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine and to evaluate the rate of undetected findings in archived radiological reports. METHODS: A retrospective search of patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI from January 2006 to December 2010 was conducted. By means of randomisation, we retrospectively reviewed 3,000 lumbar spine MRI examinations. Extra-spinal abnormalities were classified according to a modified CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS). We retrospectively compared our structured approach with the archived MRI reports as it regarded the detection of extra-spinal IF to estimate non-detection rates. RESULTS: By means of the structured approach used, extra-spinal findings were detected in 2,060 (68.6 %) of the 3,000 lumbar spine MRI examinations; 362 (17.6 %) patients had indeterminate or clinically important findings (E3 and E4) requiring clinical correlation or further evaluation. After review of the original archived radiological reports, potentially important C-RADS E3 and E4 extra-spinal IF were respectively reported in 47 of the 265 (17.7 %) and in 8 of 74 (10.8 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that incidental extra-spinal findings at conventional lumbar spine MRI are common but underestimated in radiological reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3675253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36752532013-06-10 Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo Giona, Alessandro Di Martino, Alberto Corrado Errante, Yuri Scarciolla, Laura Mallio, Carlo Augusto Denaro, Vincenzo Zobel, Bruno Beomonte Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of clinically and non-clinically relevant extra-spinal incidental findings (IF) in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine and to evaluate the rate of undetected findings in archived radiological reports. METHODS: A retrospective search of patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI from January 2006 to December 2010 was conducted. By means of randomisation, we retrospectively reviewed 3,000 lumbar spine MRI examinations. Extra-spinal abnormalities were classified according to a modified CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS). We retrospectively compared our structured approach with the archived MRI reports as it regarded the detection of extra-spinal IF to estimate non-detection rates. RESULTS: By means of the structured approach used, extra-spinal findings were detected in 2,060 (68.6 %) of the 3,000 lumbar spine MRI examinations; 362 (17.6 %) patients had indeterminate or clinically important findings (E3 and E4) requiring clinical correlation or further evaluation. After review of the original archived radiological reports, potentially important C-RADS E3 and E4 extra-spinal IF were respectively reported in 47 of the 265 (17.7 %) and in 8 of 74 (10.8 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that incidental extra-spinal findings at conventional lumbar spine MRI are common but underestimated in radiological reports. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3675253/ /pubmed/23456750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0234-z Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo
Giona, Alessandro
Di Martino, Alberto Corrado
Errante, Yuri
Scarciolla, Laura
Mallio, Carlo Augusto
Denaro, Vincenzo
Zobel, Bruno Beomonte
Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study
title Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study
title_full Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study
title_fullStr Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study
title_short Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study
title_sort extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine mri in the general population: a large cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23456750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0234-z
work_keys_str_mv AT quattrocchicarlocosimo extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy
AT gionaalessandro extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy
AT dimartinoalbertocorrado extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy
AT erranteyuri extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy
AT scarciollalaura extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy
AT malliocarloaugusto extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy
AT denarovincenzo extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy
AT zobelbrunobeomonte extraspinalincidentalfindingsatlumbarspinemriinthegeneralpopulationalargecohortstudy