Cargando…
Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials
PURPOSE: This in vitro study intended to investigate the mechanical and thermal characteristics of Valplast, and of polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin in which different esthetic fibers (E-glass, nylon 6 or nylon 6.6) were added. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five groups were formed: control (PMMA)...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755341 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.153 |
_version_ | 1782272503137173504 |
---|---|
author | Soygun, Koray Bolayir, Giray Boztug, Ali |
author_facet | Soygun, Koray Bolayir, Giray Boztug, Ali |
author_sort | Soygun, Koray |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This in vitro study intended to investigate the mechanical and thermal characteristics of Valplast, and of polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin in which different esthetic fibers (E-glass, nylon 6 or nylon 6.6) were added. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five groups were formed: control (PMMA), PMMA-E glass, PMMA-nylon 6, PMMA-nylon 6.6 and Valplast resin. For the transverse strength test the specimens were prepared in accordance with ANSI/ADA specification No.12, and for the impact test ASTM D-256 standard were used. With the intent to evaluate the properties of transverse strength, the three-point bending (n=7) test instrument (Lloyd NK5, Lloyd Instruments Ltd, Fareham Hampshire, UK) was used at 5 mm/min. A Dynatup 9250 HV (Instron, UK) device was employed for the impact strength (n=7). All of the resin samples were tested by using thermo-mechanical analysis (Shimadzu TMA 50, Shimadzu, Japan). The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey tests for pairwise comparisons of the groups at the 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS: In all mechanical tests, the highest values were observed in Valplast group (transverse strength: 117.22 ± 37.80 MPa, maximum deflection: 27.55 ± 1.48 mm, impact strength: 0.76 ± 0.03 kN). Upon examining the thermo-mechanical analysis data, it was seen that the E value of the control sample was 8.08 MPa, higher than that of the all other samples. CONCLUSION: Although Valplast denture material has good mechanical strength, its elastic modulus is not high enough to meet the standard of PMMA materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3675288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36752882013-06-10 Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials Soygun, Koray Bolayir, Giray Boztug, Ali J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: This in vitro study intended to investigate the mechanical and thermal characteristics of Valplast, and of polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin in which different esthetic fibers (E-glass, nylon 6 or nylon 6.6) were added. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five groups were formed: control (PMMA), PMMA-E glass, PMMA-nylon 6, PMMA-nylon 6.6 and Valplast resin. For the transverse strength test the specimens were prepared in accordance with ANSI/ADA specification No.12, and for the impact test ASTM D-256 standard were used. With the intent to evaluate the properties of transverse strength, the three-point bending (n=7) test instrument (Lloyd NK5, Lloyd Instruments Ltd, Fareham Hampshire, UK) was used at 5 mm/min. A Dynatup 9250 HV (Instron, UK) device was employed for the impact strength (n=7). All of the resin samples were tested by using thermo-mechanical analysis (Shimadzu TMA 50, Shimadzu, Japan). The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey tests for pairwise comparisons of the groups at the 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS: In all mechanical tests, the highest values were observed in Valplast group (transverse strength: 117.22 ± 37.80 MPa, maximum deflection: 27.55 ± 1.48 mm, impact strength: 0.76 ± 0.03 kN). Upon examining the thermo-mechanical analysis data, it was seen that the E value of the control sample was 8.08 MPa, higher than that of the all other samples. CONCLUSION: Although Valplast denture material has good mechanical strength, its elastic modulus is not high enough to meet the standard of PMMA materials. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2013-05 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3675288/ /pubmed/23755341 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.153 Text en © 2013 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Soygun, Koray Bolayir, Giray Boztug, Ali Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials |
title | Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials |
title_full | Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials |
title_fullStr | Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials |
title_short | Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials |
title_sort | mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced pmma denture base materials |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23755341 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soygunkoray mechanicalandthermalpropertiesofpolyamideversusreinforcedpmmadenturebasematerials AT bolayirgiray mechanicalandthermalpropertiesofpolyamideversusreinforcedpmmadenturebasematerials AT boztugali mechanicalandthermalpropertiesofpolyamideversusreinforcedpmmadenturebasematerials |