Cargando…

Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In infected incisional ventral hernias (IVHs), the use of a synthetic non-absorbable mesh is not recommended and biological meshes hold promise. However, the level of evidence for their safety and efficacy remains low. METHODS: The SIMBIOSE trial is a multicenter, phase III, randomized,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariette, Christophe, Briez, Nicolas, Denies, Fanette, Dervaux, Benoît, Duhamel, Alain, Guilbert, Marie, Bruyère, Emilie, Robb, William B, Piessen, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-14-131
_version_ 1782476088981585920
author Mariette, Christophe
Briez, Nicolas
Denies, Fanette
Dervaux, Benoît
Duhamel, Alain
Guilbert, Marie
Bruyère, Emilie
Robb, William B
Piessen, Guillaume
author_facet Mariette, Christophe
Briez, Nicolas
Denies, Fanette
Dervaux, Benoît
Duhamel, Alain
Guilbert, Marie
Bruyère, Emilie
Robb, William B
Piessen, Guillaume
author_sort Mariette, Christophe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In infected incisional ventral hernias (IVHs), the use of a synthetic non-absorbable mesh is not recommended and biological meshes hold promise. However, the level of evidence for their safety and efficacy remains low. METHODS: The SIMBIOSE trial is a multicenter, phase III, randomized, controlled trial comparing the use of a biological mesh versus traditional wound care in patients with an IVH. The primary end point is 6-month infectious and/or wound morbidity. Secondary end points are wound infection and recurrent hernia rates, post-operative pain, quality of life, time to heal, reoperation need, impact of the cross-linked mesh structure, and a medico-economic evaluation. One hundred patients need to be included. RESULTS: The main results expected with biological mesh use are a significant decrease of post-operative morbidity, hernia recurrence, time to heal, and costs with an improved quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, the impact of biological meshes in the treatment of IVHs will be evaluated in an academic, randomized, phase III trial to provide scientific evidence ( NCT01594450). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01594450
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3675420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36754202013-06-08 Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial Mariette, Christophe Briez, Nicolas Denies, Fanette Dervaux, Benoît Duhamel, Alain Guilbert, Marie Bruyère, Emilie Robb, William B Piessen, Guillaume Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In infected incisional ventral hernias (IVHs), the use of a synthetic non-absorbable mesh is not recommended and biological meshes hold promise. However, the level of evidence for their safety and efficacy remains low. METHODS: The SIMBIOSE trial is a multicenter, phase III, randomized, controlled trial comparing the use of a biological mesh versus traditional wound care in patients with an IVH. The primary end point is 6-month infectious and/or wound morbidity. Secondary end points are wound infection and recurrent hernia rates, post-operative pain, quality of life, time to heal, reoperation need, impact of the cross-linked mesh structure, and a medico-economic evaluation. One hundred patients need to be included. RESULTS: The main results expected with biological mesh use are a significant decrease of post-operative morbidity, hernia recurrence, time to heal, and costs with an improved quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, the impact of biological meshes in the treatment of IVHs will be evaluated in an academic, randomized, phase III trial to provide scientific evidence ( NCT01594450). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01594450 BioMed Central 2013-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3675420/ /pubmed/23782773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-14-131 Text en Copyright © 2013 Mariette et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mariette, Christophe
Briez, Nicolas
Denies, Fanette
Dervaux, Benoît
Duhamel, Alain
Guilbert, Marie
Bruyère, Emilie
Robb, William B
Piessen, Guillaume
Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial
title Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial
title_full Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial
title_fullStr Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial
title_short Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial
title_sort use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the simbiose study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-14-131
work_keys_str_mv AT mariettechristophe useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial
AT brieznicolas useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial
AT deniesfanette useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial
AT dervauxbenoit useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial
AT duhamelalain useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial
AT guilbertmarie useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial
AT bruyereemilie useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial
AT robbwilliamb useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial
AT piessenguillaume useofbiologicalmeshversusstandardwoundcareininfectedincisionalventralherniasthesimbiosestudyastudyprotocolforarandomizedmulticentercontrolledtrial