Cargando…
Effective Control of Non-Native American Mink by Strategic Trapping in a River Catchment in Mainland Britain
The introduction of American mink (Neovison vison; hereafter mink) into Europe has had severe impacts on many native wildlife species, including the water vole (Arvicola amphibius) in mainland Britain. Although trapping has been widely used to attempt to control mink, managers have little direct evi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.500 |
_version_ | 1782476120900239360 |
---|---|
author | Reynolds, Jonathan C Richardson, Suzanne M Rodgers, Ben J E Rodgers, Owain R K |
author_facet | Reynolds, Jonathan C Richardson, Suzanne M Rodgers, Ben J E Rodgers, Owain R K |
author_sort | Reynolds, Jonathan C |
collection | PubMed |
description | The introduction of American mink (Neovison vison; hereafter mink) into Europe has had severe impacts on many native wildlife species, including the water vole (Arvicola amphibius) in mainland Britain. Although trapping has been widely used to attempt to control mink, managers have little direct evidence of its effect on mink density or distribution, particularly where immigration of mink from nearby areas is inevitable. Such evidence is needed to justify the use of lethal methods in conservation policy. During 2006–2010 we removed mink from the River Monnow Catchment in western Britain, using track-recording rafts to monitor continuously for mink presence, guiding a strategic trapping effort. The area monitored and trapped was increased in stages, from a core sub-catchment with 109 km of water-course in 2006, to a 421-km(2) catchment with 203 km of water-course in 2009. In each successive sub-catchment, mink detection and capture rates declined rapidly to near-zero levels after trapping began. Detections and captures showed seasonal peaks in every year corresponding to known dispersal periods, but also declined steadily from year to year, with increasing periods in which we did not detect mink. These results suggested that each sub-catchment was cleared of mink within a few months, with subsequent captures attributable to immigration. On average, we detected each mink 5.1 times before capture (daily probability of detection = 0.059 per mink and raft), and trapped them 3.4 days after deploying traps in response. On average, mink entering the area were likely to have been present for less than 13 days before capture. Water voles had been extinct in the Monnow Catchment since the 1980s. During 2006–2008 (starting 6 months after mink trapping commenced), we released 700 captive-bred water voles into the treatment area to re-establish a wild population. Persistence of this population through the 4 years of the project was considered indicative of effective mink control. This study demonstrates that, even in a mainland context, a systematic trapping strategy can have a substantial impact on the density and distribution of a damaging species, in this case allowing the restoration of a native prey species. © 2013 The Wildlife Society |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3675646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36756462013-06-10 Effective Control of Non-Native American Mink by Strategic Trapping in a River Catchment in Mainland Britain Reynolds, Jonathan C Richardson, Suzanne M Rodgers, Ben J E Rodgers, Owain R K J Wildl Manage Management and Conservation The introduction of American mink (Neovison vison; hereafter mink) into Europe has had severe impacts on many native wildlife species, including the water vole (Arvicola amphibius) in mainland Britain. Although trapping has been widely used to attempt to control mink, managers have little direct evidence of its effect on mink density or distribution, particularly where immigration of mink from nearby areas is inevitable. Such evidence is needed to justify the use of lethal methods in conservation policy. During 2006–2010 we removed mink from the River Monnow Catchment in western Britain, using track-recording rafts to monitor continuously for mink presence, guiding a strategic trapping effort. The area monitored and trapped was increased in stages, from a core sub-catchment with 109 km of water-course in 2006, to a 421-km(2) catchment with 203 km of water-course in 2009. In each successive sub-catchment, mink detection and capture rates declined rapidly to near-zero levels after trapping began. Detections and captures showed seasonal peaks in every year corresponding to known dispersal periods, but also declined steadily from year to year, with increasing periods in which we did not detect mink. These results suggested that each sub-catchment was cleared of mink within a few months, with subsequent captures attributable to immigration. On average, we detected each mink 5.1 times before capture (daily probability of detection = 0.059 per mink and raft), and trapped them 3.4 days after deploying traps in response. On average, mink entering the area were likely to have been present for less than 13 days before capture. Water voles had been extinct in the Monnow Catchment since the 1980s. During 2006–2008 (starting 6 months after mink trapping commenced), we released 700 captive-bred water voles into the treatment area to re-establish a wild population. Persistence of this population through the 4 years of the project was considered indicative of effective mink control. This study demonstrates that, even in a mainland context, a systematic trapping strategy can have a substantial impact on the density and distribution of a damaging species, in this case allowing the restoration of a native prey species. © 2013 The Wildlife Society John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2013-04 2013-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3675646/ /pubmed/23761940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.500 Text en Copyright © The Wildlife Society, 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Management and Conservation Reynolds, Jonathan C Richardson, Suzanne M Rodgers, Ben J E Rodgers, Owain R K Effective Control of Non-Native American Mink by Strategic Trapping in a River Catchment in Mainland Britain |
title | Effective Control of Non-Native American Mink by Strategic Trapping in a River Catchment in Mainland Britain |
title_full | Effective Control of Non-Native American Mink by Strategic Trapping in a River Catchment in Mainland Britain |
title_fullStr | Effective Control of Non-Native American Mink by Strategic Trapping in a River Catchment in Mainland Britain |
title_full_unstemmed | Effective Control of Non-Native American Mink by Strategic Trapping in a River Catchment in Mainland Britain |
title_short | Effective Control of Non-Native American Mink by Strategic Trapping in a River Catchment in Mainland Britain |
title_sort | effective control of non-native american mink by strategic trapping in a river catchment in mainland britain |
topic | Management and Conservation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.500 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reynoldsjonathanc effectivecontrolofnonnativeamericanminkbystrategictrappinginarivercatchmentinmainlandbritain AT richardsonsuzannem effectivecontrolofnonnativeamericanminkbystrategictrappinginarivercatchmentinmainlandbritain AT rodgersbenje effectivecontrolofnonnativeamericanminkbystrategictrappinginarivercatchmentinmainlandbritain AT rodgersowainrk effectivecontrolofnonnativeamericanminkbystrategictrappinginarivercatchmentinmainlandbritain |