Cargando…

Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND: The 3-hour window for treating stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) requires well-organized, integrated efforts by emergency physicians and stroke neurologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes and knowledge of emergency physicians about intravenous t-PA for acute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bobrow, Bentley J., Demaerschalk, Bart M., Wood, Joseph P., Villarin, Albert, Clark, Lani, Jennings, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3676339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818807
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The 3-hour window for treating stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) requires well-organized, integrated efforts by emergency physicians and stroke neurologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes and knowledge of emergency physicians about intravenous t-PA for acute ischemic stroke, particularly in primary stroke centers (PSCs) with stroke neurology teams. METHODS: A 15-question pilot Internet survey administered by the Arizona College of Emergency Physicians. RESULTS: Between March and August 2005, 100 emergency physicians responded: 71 in Arizona and 29 in Missouri. Forty-eight percent practiced at PSCs; 48% thought t-PA was effective, 20% did not, and 32% were uncertain. PSC or non-PSC location of practice did not influence endorsement (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.27–1.64). Of those opposing t-PA, 87% cited risk of hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Most emergency physicians did not endorse t-PA. Improved collaboration between emergency physicians and stroke neurologists is needed.