Cargando…
Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke
BACKGROUND: The 3-hour window for treating stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) requires well-organized, integrated efforts by emergency physicians and stroke neurologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes and knowledge of emergency physicians about intravenous t-PA for acute...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Libertas Academica
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3676339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818807 |
_version_ | 1782272622519648256 |
---|---|
author | Bobrow, Bentley J. Demaerschalk, Bart M. Wood, Joseph P. Villarin, Albert Clark, Lani Jennings, Anthony |
author_facet | Bobrow, Bentley J. Demaerschalk, Bart M. Wood, Joseph P. Villarin, Albert Clark, Lani Jennings, Anthony |
author_sort | Bobrow, Bentley J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 3-hour window for treating stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) requires well-organized, integrated efforts by emergency physicians and stroke neurologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes and knowledge of emergency physicians about intravenous t-PA for acute ischemic stroke, particularly in primary stroke centers (PSCs) with stroke neurology teams. METHODS: A 15-question pilot Internet survey administered by the Arizona College of Emergency Physicians. RESULTS: Between March and August 2005, 100 emergency physicians responded: 71 in Arizona and 29 in Missouri. Forty-eight percent practiced at PSCs; 48% thought t-PA was effective, 20% did not, and 32% were uncertain. PSC or non-PSC location of practice did not influence endorsement (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.27–1.64). Of those opposing t-PA, 87% cited risk of hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Most emergency physicians did not endorse t-PA. Improved collaboration between emergency physicians and stroke neurologists is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3676339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Libertas Academica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36763392013-07-01 Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Bobrow, Bentley J. Demaerschalk, Bart M. Wood, Joseph P. Villarin, Albert Clark, Lani Jennings, Anthony J Brain Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The 3-hour window for treating stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) requires well-organized, integrated efforts by emergency physicians and stroke neurologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes and knowledge of emergency physicians about intravenous t-PA for acute ischemic stroke, particularly in primary stroke centers (PSCs) with stroke neurology teams. METHODS: A 15-question pilot Internet survey administered by the Arizona College of Emergency Physicians. RESULTS: Between March and August 2005, 100 emergency physicians responded: 71 in Arizona and 29 in Missouri. Forty-eight percent practiced at PSCs; 48% thought t-PA was effective, 20% did not, and 32% were uncertain. PSC or non-PSC location of practice did not influence endorsement (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.27–1.64). Of those opposing t-PA, 87% cited risk of hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Most emergency physicians did not endorse t-PA. Improved collaboration between emergency physicians and stroke neurologists is needed. Libertas Academica 2009-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3676339/ /pubmed/23818807 Text en © 2009 the author(s) This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bobrow, Bentley J. Demaerschalk, Bart M. Wood, Joseph P. Villarin, Albert Clark, Lani Jennings, Anthony Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title | Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_full | Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_fullStr | Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_short | Views of Emergency Physicians on Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_sort | views of emergency physicians on thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3676339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bobrowbentleyj viewsofemergencyphysiciansonthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke AT demaerschalkbartm viewsofemergencyphysiciansonthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke AT woodjosephp viewsofemergencyphysiciansonthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke AT villarinalbert viewsofemergencyphysiciansonthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke AT clarklani viewsofemergencyphysiciansonthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke AT jenningsanthony viewsofemergencyphysiciansonthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke |