Cargando…

A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)

PURPOSE: The aim of non-interventional studies (NIS) with medicinal products is to investigate the use of authorized medicinal products in daily routine. In the past, this type of study has been subject to frequent criticism, and many recommendations have been published. The aim of our study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Jeinsen, Beatrice K. J. G., Sudhop, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3676740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23512215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1482-z
_version_ 1782272655746924544
author von Jeinsen, Beatrice K. J. G.
Sudhop, Thomas
author_facet von Jeinsen, Beatrice K. J. G.
Sudhop, Thomas
author_sort von Jeinsen, Beatrice K. J. G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of non-interventional studies (NIS) with medicinal products is to investigate the use of authorized medicinal products in daily routine. In the past, this type of study has been subject to frequent criticism, and many recommendations have been published. The aim of our study was to assess the quality of NIS study protocols. METHODS: Nearly all NIS study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) within a period of one year could be analyzed. The protocols were evaluated in terms of objectives, methods and included patients, as well as with regard to their compliance with quality recommendations for NIS by federal authorities and pharmaceutical industry associations. RESULTS: The 136 NIS available for study were scheduled to enroll approximately 330,000 patients (2,500 patients per study) and 43,000 healthcare professionals. Of these NIS, 58 % were performed with medicinal products that had been authorized within the past 5 years; however, 68 % of the investigated active pharmaceutical ingredients were older than 5 years, and 19 % were even older than 19 years. Only 56 % of the protocols provided information on publication policy, and 65 % required the involvement of ethic committees. The adherence to current quality recommendations was average, but the compliance of NIS performed by member companies of the Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies was significantly higher than that of other sponsors. CONCLUSIONS: Current quality recommendations are still not fully implemented in most NIS protocols. Therefore, the scientific value of many NIS is still questionable, and the criticism that NIS are mainly conducted for marketing reasons could not be refuted by the data analyzed here. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-013-1482-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3676740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36767402013-06-10 A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) von Jeinsen, Beatrice K. J. G. Sudhop, Thomas Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: The aim of non-interventional studies (NIS) with medicinal products is to investigate the use of authorized medicinal products in daily routine. In the past, this type of study has been subject to frequent criticism, and many recommendations have been published. The aim of our study was to assess the quality of NIS study protocols. METHODS: Nearly all NIS study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) within a period of one year could be analyzed. The protocols were evaluated in terms of objectives, methods and included patients, as well as with regard to their compliance with quality recommendations for NIS by federal authorities and pharmaceutical industry associations. RESULTS: The 136 NIS available for study were scheduled to enroll approximately 330,000 patients (2,500 patients per study) and 43,000 healthcare professionals. Of these NIS, 58 % were performed with medicinal products that had been authorized within the past 5 years; however, 68 % of the investigated active pharmaceutical ingredients were older than 5 years, and 19 % were even older than 19 years. Only 56 % of the protocols provided information on publication policy, and 65 % required the involvement of ethic committees. The adherence to current quality recommendations was average, but the compliance of NIS performed by member companies of the Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies was significantly higher than that of other sponsors. CONCLUSIONS: Current quality recommendations are still not fully implemented in most NIS protocols. Therefore, the scientific value of many NIS is still questionable, and the criticism that NIS are mainly conducted for marketing reasons could not be refuted by the data analyzed here. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-013-1482-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2013-03-20 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3676740/ /pubmed/23512215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1482-z Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
von Jeinsen, Beatrice K. J. G.
Sudhop, Thomas
A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)
title A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)
title_full A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)
title_fullStr A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)
title_full_unstemmed A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)
title_short A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)
title_sort 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the german federal institute for drugs and medical devices (bfarm)
topic Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3676740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23512215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1482-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vonjeinsenbeatricekjg a1yearcrosssectionalanalysisofnoninterventionalpostmarketingstudyprotocolssubmittedtothegermanfederalinstitutefordrugsandmedicaldevicesbfarm
AT sudhopthomas a1yearcrosssectionalanalysisofnoninterventionalpostmarketingstudyprotocolssubmittedtothegermanfederalinstitutefordrugsandmedicaldevicesbfarm
AT vonjeinsenbeatricekjg 1yearcrosssectionalanalysisofnoninterventionalpostmarketingstudyprotocolssubmittedtothegermanfederalinstitutefordrugsandmedicaldevicesbfarm
AT sudhopthomas 1yearcrosssectionalanalysisofnoninterventionalpostmarketingstudyprotocolssubmittedtothegermanfederalinstitutefordrugsandmedicaldevicesbfarm