Cargando…

Reward predictions bias attentional selection

Attention selects stimuli for perceptual and cognitive processing according to an adaptive selection schedule. It has long been known that attention selects stimuli that are task relevant or perceptually salient. Recent evidence has shown that stimuli previously associated with reward persistently c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Brian A., Laurent, Patryk A., Yantis, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00262
_version_ 1782272806631768064
author Anderson, Brian A.
Laurent, Patryk A.
Yantis, Steven
author_facet Anderson, Brian A.
Laurent, Patryk A.
Yantis, Steven
author_sort Anderson, Brian A.
collection PubMed
description Attention selects stimuli for perceptual and cognitive processing according to an adaptive selection schedule. It has long been known that attention selects stimuli that are task relevant or perceptually salient. Recent evidence has shown that stimuli previously associated with reward persistently capture attention involuntarily, even when they are no longer associated with reward. Here we examine whether the capture of attention by previously reward-associated stimuli is modulated by the processing of current but unrelated rewards. Participants learned to associate two color stimuli with different amounts of reward during a training phase. In a subsequent test phase, these previously rewarded color stimuli were occasionally presented as to-be-ignored distractors while participants performed visual search for each of two differentially rewarded shape-defined targets. The results reveal that attentional capture by formerly rewarded distractors was the largest when both recently received and currently expected reward were the highest in the test phase, even though such rewards were unrelated to the color distractors. Our findings support a model in which value-driven attentional biases acquired through reward learning are maintained via the cognitive mechanisms involved in predicting future rewards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3678100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36781002013-06-18 Reward predictions bias attentional selection Anderson, Brian A. Laurent, Patryk A. Yantis, Steven Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Attention selects stimuli for perceptual and cognitive processing according to an adaptive selection schedule. It has long been known that attention selects stimuli that are task relevant or perceptually salient. Recent evidence has shown that stimuli previously associated with reward persistently capture attention involuntarily, even when they are no longer associated with reward. Here we examine whether the capture of attention by previously reward-associated stimuli is modulated by the processing of current but unrelated rewards. Participants learned to associate two color stimuli with different amounts of reward during a training phase. In a subsequent test phase, these previously rewarded color stimuli were occasionally presented as to-be-ignored distractors while participants performed visual search for each of two differentially rewarded shape-defined targets. The results reveal that attentional capture by formerly rewarded distractors was the largest when both recently received and currently expected reward were the highest in the test phase, even though such rewards were unrelated to the color distractors. Our findings support a model in which value-driven attentional biases acquired through reward learning are maintained via the cognitive mechanisms involved in predicting future rewards. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3678100/ /pubmed/23781185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00262 Text en Copyright © 2013 Anderson, Laurent and Yantis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Anderson, Brian A.
Laurent, Patryk A.
Yantis, Steven
Reward predictions bias attentional selection
title Reward predictions bias attentional selection
title_full Reward predictions bias attentional selection
title_fullStr Reward predictions bias attentional selection
title_full_unstemmed Reward predictions bias attentional selection
title_short Reward predictions bias attentional selection
title_sort reward predictions bias attentional selection
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00262
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonbriana rewardpredictionsbiasattentionalselection
AT laurentpatryka rewardpredictionsbiasattentionalselection
AT yantissteven rewardpredictionsbiasattentionalselection