Cargando…

Individual IOL Surface Topography Analysis by the WaveMaster Reflex UV

Purpose. In order to establish inspection routines for individual intraocular lenses (IOLs), their surfaces have to be measured separately. Currently available measurement devices lack this functionality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new topography measurement device based on wavefront...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kannengießer, Marc, Langenbucher, Achim, Janunts, Edgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/363742
_version_ 1782272848001236992
author Kannengießer, Marc
Langenbucher, Achim
Janunts, Edgar
author_facet Kannengießer, Marc
Langenbucher, Achim
Janunts, Edgar
author_sort Kannengießer, Marc
collection PubMed
description Purpose. In order to establish inspection routines for individual intraocular lenses (IOLs), their surfaces have to be measured separately. Currently available measurement devices lack this functionality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new topography measurement device based on wavefront analysis for measuring individual regular and freeform IOL surfaces, the “WaveMaster Reflex UV” (Trioptics, Wedel, Germany). Methods. Measurements were performed on IOLs with increasingly complex surface geometries: spherical surfaces, surfaces modelled by higher-order Zernike terms, and freeform surfaces from biometrical patient data. Two independent parameters were measured: the sample's radius of curvature (ROC) and its residual (difference of sample topography and its best-fit sphere). We used a quantitative analysis method by calculating the residuals' root-mean-square (RMS) and peak-to-Valley (P2V) values. Results. The sample's best-fit ROC differences increased with the sample's complexity. The sample's differences of RMS values were 80 nm for spherical surfaces, 97 nm for higher-order samples, and 21 nm for freeform surfaces. Graphical representations of both measurement and design topographies were recorded and compared. Conclusion. The measurements of spherical surfaces expectedly resulted in better values than those of freeform surfaces. Overall, the wavefront analysing method proves to be an effective method for evaluating individual IOL surfaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3678422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36784222013-06-18 Individual IOL Surface Topography Analysis by the WaveMaster Reflex UV Kannengießer, Marc Langenbucher, Achim Janunts, Edgar Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. In order to establish inspection routines for individual intraocular lenses (IOLs), their surfaces have to be measured separately. Currently available measurement devices lack this functionality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new topography measurement device based on wavefront analysis for measuring individual regular and freeform IOL surfaces, the “WaveMaster Reflex UV” (Trioptics, Wedel, Germany). Methods. Measurements were performed on IOLs with increasingly complex surface geometries: spherical surfaces, surfaces modelled by higher-order Zernike terms, and freeform surfaces from biometrical patient data. Two independent parameters were measured: the sample's radius of curvature (ROC) and its residual (difference of sample topography and its best-fit sphere). We used a quantitative analysis method by calculating the residuals' root-mean-square (RMS) and peak-to-Valley (P2V) values. Results. The sample's best-fit ROC differences increased with the sample's complexity. The sample's differences of RMS values were 80 nm for spherical surfaces, 97 nm for higher-order samples, and 21 nm for freeform surfaces. Graphical representations of both measurement and design topographies were recorded and compared. Conclusion. The measurements of spherical surfaces expectedly resulted in better values than those of freeform surfaces. Overall, the wavefront analysing method proves to be an effective method for evaluating individual IOL surfaces. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3678422/ /pubmed/23781500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/363742 Text en Copyright © 2013 Marc Kannengießer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kannengießer, Marc
Langenbucher, Achim
Janunts, Edgar
Individual IOL Surface Topography Analysis by the WaveMaster Reflex UV
title Individual IOL Surface Topography Analysis by the WaveMaster Reflex UV
title_full Individual IOL Surface Topography Analysis by the WaveMaster Reflex UV
title_fullStr Individual IOL Surface Topography Analysis by the WaveMaster Reflex UV
title_full_unstemmed Individual IOL Surface Topography Analysis by the WaveMaster Reflex UV
title_short Individual IOL Surface Topography Analysis by the WaveMaster Reflex UV
title_sort individual iol surface topography analysis by the wavemaster reflex uv
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/363742
work_keys_str_mv AT kannengießermarc individualiolsurfacetopographyanalysisbythewavemasterreflexuv
AT langenbucherachim individualiolsurfacetopographyanalysisbythewavemasterreflexuv
AT januntsedgar individualiolsurfacetopographyanalysisbythewavemasterreflexuv