Cargando…
Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks
Estimates of population size are critical for conservation and management, but accurate estimates are difficult to obtain for many species. Noninvasive genetic methods are increasingly used to estimate population size, particularly in elusive species such as large carnivores, which are difficult to...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.538 |
_version_ | 1782272862234607616 |
---|---|
author | Creel, Scott Rosenblatt, Elias |
author_facet | Creel, Scott Rosenblatt, Elias |
author_sort | Creel, Scott |
collection | PubMed |
description | Estimates of population size are critical for conservation and management, but accurate estimates are difficult to obtain for many species. Noninvasive genetic methods are increasingly used to estimate population size, particularly in elusive species such as large carnivores, which are difficult to count by most other methods. In most such studies, genotypes are treated simply as unique individual identifiers. Here, we develop a new estimator of population size based on pedigree reconstruction. The estimator accounts for individuals that were directly sampled, individuals that were not sampled but whose genotype could be inferred by pedigree reconstruction, and individuals that were not detected by either of these methods. Monte Carlo simulations show that the population estimate is unbiased and precise if sampling is of sufficient intensity and duration. Simulations also identified sampling conditions that can cause the method to overestimate or underestimate true population size; we present and discuss methods to correct these potential biases. The method detected 2–21% more individuals than were directly sampled across a broad range of simulated sampling schemes. Genotypes are more than unique identifiers, and the information about relationships in a set of genotypes can improve estimates of population size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3678484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36784842013-06-12 Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks Creel, Scott Rosenblatt, Elias Ecol Evol Original Research Estimates of population size are critical for conservation and management, but accurate estimates are difficult to obtain for many species. Noninvasive genetic methods are increasingly used to estimate population size, particularly in elusive species such as large carnivores, which are difficult to count by most other methods. In most such studies, genotypes are treated simply as unique individual identifiers. Here, we develop a new estimator of population size based on pedigree reconstruction. The estimator accounts for individuals that were directly sampled, individuals that were not sampled but whose genotype could be inferred by pedigree reconstruction, and individuals that were not detected by either of these methods. Monte Carlo simulations show that the population estimate is unbiased and precise if sampling is of sufficient intensity and duration. Simulations also identified sampling conditions that can cause the method to overestimate or underestimate true population size; we present and discuss methods to correct these potential biases. The method detected 2–21% more individuals than were directly sampled across a broad range of simulated sampling schemes. Genotypes are more than unique identifiers, and the information about relationships in a set of genotypes can improve estimates of population size. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-05 2013-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3678484/ /pubmed/23762516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.538 Text en © 2013 Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Creel, Scott Rosenblatt, Elias Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks |
title | Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks |
title_full | Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks |
title_fullStr | Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks |
title_full_unstemmed | Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks |
title_short | Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks |
title_sort | using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23762516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT creelscott usingpedigreereconstructiontoestimatepopulationsizegenotypesaremorethanindividuallyuniquemarks AT rosenblattelias usingpedigreereconstructiontoestimatepopulationsizegenotypesaremorethanindividuallyuniquemarks |