Cargando…
Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder
No studies have compared mirtazapine with duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Fifty-six patients were nonrandomly assigned to a 4-week treatment with either 15 to 45 mg/day of mirtazapine (n = 22) or 20 to 60 mg/day of duloxetine (n = 34). The primary efficacy measurements w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23766648 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S43600 |
_version_ | 1782272923505000448 |
---|---|
author | Nagao, Kei Kishi, Taro Moriwaki, Masatsugu Fujita, Kiyoshi Hirano, Shigeki Yamanouchi, Yoshio Funahashi, Toshihiko Iwata, Nakao |
author_facet | Nagao, Kei Kishi, Taro Moriwaki, Masatsugu Fujita, Kiyoshi Hirano, Shigeki Yamanouchi, Yoshio Funahashi, Toshihiko Iwata, Nakao |
author_sort | Nagao, Kei |
collection | PubMed |
description | No studies have compared mirtazapine with duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Fifty-six patients were nonrandomly assigned to a 4-week treatment with either 15 to 45 mg/day of mirtazapine (n = 22) or 20 to 60 mg/day of duloxetine (n = 34). The primary efficacy measurements were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression 6-point Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. The second efficacy measurements were the response and remission rates of treatment. Tolerability assessments were also performed. Fifty-six patients (43 male; age, 43.6 years) were recruited. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation rate between the mirtazapine and duloxetine treatment groups (P = 0.867). Both mirtazapine and duloxetine significantly improved the HRSD and MADRS scores from baseline (P < 0.0001–0.0004). While mirtazapine was superior to duloxetine in the reduction of HRSD scores (P = 0.0421), there was no significant change in MADRS scores in terms of between-group differences (P = 0.171). While more somnolence was observed with mirtazapine (P = 0.0399), more nausea was associated with duloxetine (P = 0.0089). No serious adverse events were observed for either antidepressant. Mirtazapine and duloxetine were safe and well-tolerated treatments for Japanese patients with MDD. Double-blind controlled studies are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine and duloxetine in Japanese patients with MDD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3678901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36789012013-06-13 Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder Nagao, Kei Kishi, Taro Moriwaki, Masatsugu Fujita, Kiyoshi Hirano, Shigeki Yamanouchi, Yoshio Funahashi, Toshihiko Iwata, Nakao Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research No studies have compared mirtazapine with duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Fifty-six patients were nonrandomly assigned to a 4-week treatment with either 15 to 45 mg/day of mirtazapine (n = 22) or 20 to 60 mg/day of duloxetine (n = 34). The primary efficacy measurements were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression 6-point Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. The second efficacy measurements were the response and remission rates of treatment. Tolerability assessments were also performed. Fifty-six patients (43 male; age, 43.6 years) were recruited. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation rate between the mirtazapine and duloxetine treatment groups (P = 0.867). Both mirtazapine and duloxetine significantly improved the HRSD and MADRS scores from baseline (P < 0.0001–0.0004). While mirtazapine was superior to duloxetine in the reduction of HRSD scores (P = 0.0421), there was no significant change in MADRS scores in terms of between-group differences (P = 0.171). While more somnolence was observed with mirtazapine (P = 0.0399), more nausea was associated with duloxetine (P = 0.0089). No serious adverse events were observed for either antidepressant. Mirtazapine and duloxetine were safe and well-tolerated treatments for Japanese patients with MDD. Double-blind controlled studies are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine and duloxetine in Japanese patients with MDD. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3678901/ /pubmed/23766648 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S43600 Text en © 2013 Nagao et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nagao, Kei Kishi, Taro Moriwaki, Masatsugu Fujita, Kiyoshi Hirano, Shigeki Yamanouchi, Yoshio Funahashi, Toshihiko Iwata, Nakao Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder |
title | Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder |
title_full | Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder |
title_fullStr | Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder |
title_short | Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder |
title_sort | comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23766648 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S43600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagaokei comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder AT kishitaro comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder AT moriwakimasatsugu comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder AT fujitakiyoshi comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder AT hiranoshigeki comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder AT yamanouchiyoshio comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder AT funahashitoshihiko comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder AT iwatanakao comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder |