Cargando…

Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder

No studies have compared mirtazapine with duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Fifty-six patients were nonrandomly assigned to a 4-week treatment with either 15 to 45 mg/day of mirtazapine (n = 22) or 20 to 60 mg/day of duloxetine (n = 34). The primary efficacy measurements w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagao, Kei, Kishi, Taro, Moriwaki, Masatsugu, Fujita, Kiyoshi, Hirano, Shigeki, Yamanouchi, Yoshio, Funahashi, Toshihiko, Iwata, Nakao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23766648
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S43600
_version_ 1782272923505000448
author Nagao, Kei
Kishi, Taro
Moriwaki, Masatsugu
Fujita, Kiyoshi
Hirano, Shigeki
Yamanouchi, Yoshio
Funahashi, Toshihiko
Iwata, Nakao
author_facet Nagao, Kei
Kishi, Taro
Moriwaki, Masatsugu
Fujita, Kiyoshi
Hirano, Shigeki
Yamanouchi, Yoshio
Funahashi, Toshihiko
Iwata, Nakao
author_sort Nagao, Kei
collection PubMed
description No studies have compared mirtazapine with duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Fifty-six patients were nonrandomly assigned to a 4-week treatment with either 15 to 45 mg/day of mirtazapine (n = 22) or 20 to 60 mg/day of duloxetine (n = 34). The primary efficacy measurements were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression 6-point Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. The second efficacy measurements were the response and remission rates of treatment. Tolerability assessments were also performed. Fifty-six patients (43 male; age, 43.6 years) were recruited. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation rate between the mirtazapine and duloxetine treatment groups (P = 0.867). Both mirtazapine and duloxetine significantly improved the HRSD and MADRS scores from baseline (P < 0.0001–0.0004). While mirtazapine was superior to duloxetine in the reduction of HRSD scores (P = 0.0421), there was no significant change in MADRS scores in terms of between-group differences (P = 0.171). While more somnolence was observed with mirtazapine (P = 0.0399), more nausea was associated with duloxetine (P = 0.0089). No serious adverse events were observed for either antidepressant. Mirtazapine and duloxetine were safe and well-tolerated treatments for Japanese patients with MDD. Double-blind controlled studies are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine and duloxetine in Japanese patients with MDD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3678901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36789012013-06-13 Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder Nagao, Kei Kishi, Taro Moriwaki, Masatsugu Fujita, Kiyoshi Hirano, Shigeki Yamanouchi, Yoshio Funahashi, Toshihiko Iwata, Nakao Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research No studies have compared mirtazapine with duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Fifty-six patients were nonrandomly assigned to a 4-week treatment with either 15 to 45 mg/day of mirtazapine (n = 22) or 20 to 60 mg/day of duloxetine (n = 34). The primary efficacy measurements were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression 6-point Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. The second efficacy measurements were the response and remission rates of treatment. Tolerability assessments were also performed. Fifty-six patients (43 male; age, 43.6 years) were recruited. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation rate between the mirtazapine and duloxetine treatment groups (P = 0.867). Both mirtazapine and duloxetine significantly improved the HRSD and MADRS scores from baseline (P < 0.0001–0.0004). While mirtazapine was superior to duloxetine in the reduction of HRSD scores (P = 0.0421), there was no significant change in MADRS scores in terms of between-group differences (P = 0.171). While more somnolence was observed with mirtazapine (P = 0.0399), more nausea was associated with duloxetine (P = 0.0089). No serious adverse events were observed for either antidepressant. Mirtazapine and duloxetine were safe and well-tolerated treatments for Japanese patients with MDD. Double-blind controlled studies are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine and duloxetine in Japanese patients with MDD. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3678901/ /pubmed/23766648 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S43600 Text en © 2013 Nagao et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nagao, Kei
Kishi, Taro
Moriwaki, Masatsugu
Fujita, Kiyoshi
Hirano, Shigeki
Yamanouchi, Yoshio
Funahashi, Toshihiko
Iwata, Nakao
Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder
title Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder
title_full Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder
title_fullStr Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder
title_short Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder
title_sort comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23766648
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S43600
work_keys_str_mv AT nagaokei comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder
AT kishitaro comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder
AT moriwakimasatsugu comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder
AT fujitakiyoshi comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder
AT hiranoshigeki comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder
AT yamanouchiyoshio comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder
AT funahashitoshihiko comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder
AT iwatanakao comparativeclinicalprofileofmirtazapineandduloxetineinpracticalclinicalsettingsinjapana4weekopenlabelparallelgroupstudyofmajordepressivedisorder