Cargando…

Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions

We evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kovacs, Kent, Polasky, Stephen, Nelson, Erik, Keeler, Bonnie L., Pennington, Derric, Plantinga, Andrew J., Taff, Steven J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062202
_version_ 1782272951481008128
author Kovacs, Kent
Polasky, Stephen
Nelson, Erik
Keeler, Bonnie L.
Pennington, Derric
Plantinga, Andrew J.
Taff, Steven J.
author_facet Kovacs, Kent
Polasky, Stephen
Nelson, Erik
Keeler, Bonnie L.
Pennington, Derric
Plantinga, Andrew J.
Taff, Steven J.
author_sort Kovacs, Kent
collection PubMed
description We evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land acquisitions for conservation, influence the joint provision and value of multiple ecosystem services. We calculate the ROI of a public conservation acquisition as the ratio of the present value of ecosystem services generated by the conservation to the cost of the conservation. For the land scenarios analyzed, carbon sequestration services generated the greatest benefits followed by water quality improvements and recreation opportunities. We found ROI values ranged from 0.21 to 5.28 depending on assumptions about future land use change, service values, and discount rate. Our study suggests conservation is a good investment as long as investments are targeted to areas with low land costs and high service values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3679083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36790832013-06-17 Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions Kovacs, Kent Polasky, Stephen Nelson, Erik Keeler, Bonnie L. Pennington, Derric Plantinga, Andrew J. Taff, Steven J. PLoS One Research Article We evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land acquisitions for conservation, influence the joint provision and value of multiple ecosystem services. We calculate the ROI of a public conservation acquisition as the ratio of the present value of ecosystem services generated by the conservation to the cost of the conservation. For the land scenarios analyzed, carbon sequestration services generated the greatest benefits followed by water quality improvements and recreation opportunities. We found ROI values ranged from 0.21 to 5.28 depending on assumptions about future land use change, service values, and discount rate. Our study suggests conservation is a good investment as long as investments are targeted to areas with low land costs and high service values. Public Library of Science 2013-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3679083/ /pubmed/23776429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062202 Text en © 2013 Kovacs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kovacs, Kent
Polasky, Stephen
Nelson, Erik
Keeler, Bonnie L.
Pennington, Derric
Plantinga, Andrew J.
Taff, Steven J.
Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions
title Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions
title_full Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions
title_fullStr Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions
title_short Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions
title_sort evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062202
work_keys_str_mv AT kovacskent evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT polaskystephen evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT nelsonerik evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT keelerbonniel evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT penningtonderric evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT plantingaandrewj evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions
AT taffstevenj evaluatingthereturninecosystemservicesfrominvestmentinpubliclandacquisitions