Cargando…

Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates

Affective state can influence cognition leading to biased information processing, interpretation, attention, and memory. Such bias has been reported to be essential for the onset and maintenance of different psychopathologies, particularly affective disorders. However, empirical evidence has been ve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schick, Anita, Wessa, Michèle, Vollmayr, Barbara, Kuehner, Christine, Kanske, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00272
_version_ 1782272994649833472
author Schick, Anita
Wessa, Michèle
Vollmayr, Barbara
Kuehner, Christine
Kanske, Philipp
author_facet Schick, Anita
Wessa, Michèle
Vollmayr, Barbara
Kuehner, Christine
Kanske, Philipp
author_sort Schick, Anita
collection PubMed
description Affective state can influence cognition leading to biased information processing, interpretation, attention, and memory. Such bias has been reported to be essential for the onset and maintenance of different psychopathologies, particularly affective disorders. However, empirical evidence has been very heterogeneous and little is known about the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying cognitive bias and its time-course. We therefore investigated the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli as indicators of biased information processing with an ambiguous cue-conditioning paradigm. In an acquisition phase, participants learned to discriminate two tones of different frequency, which acquired emotional and motivational value due to subsequent feedback (monetary gain or avoidance of monetary loss). In the test phase, three additional tones of intermediate frequencies were presented, whose interpretation as positive (approach of reward) or negative (avoidance of punishment), indicated by a button press, was used as an indicator of the bias. Twenty healthy volunteers participated in this paradigm while a 64-channel electroencephalogram was recorded. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing individual differences in depression and rumination. Overall, we found a small positive bias, which correlated negatively with reflective pondering, a type of rumination. As expected, reaction times were increased for intermediate tones. ERP amplitudes between 300 and 700 ms post-stimulus differed depending on the interpretation of the intermediate tones. A negative compared to a positive interpretation led to an amplitude increase over frontal electrodes. Our study provides evidence that in humans, as in animal research, the ambiguous cue-conditioning paradigm is a valid procedure for indirectly assessing ambiguous cue interpretation and a potential interpretation bias, which is sensitive to individual differences in affect-related traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3679614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36796142013-06-18 Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates Schick, Anita Wessa, Michèle Vollmayr, Barbara Kuehner, Christine Kanske, Philipp Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Affective state can influence cognition leading to biased information processing, interpretation, attention, and memory. Such bias has been reported to be essential for the onset and maintenance of different psychopathologies, particularly affective disorders. However, empirical evidence has been very heterogeneous and little is known about the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying cognitive bias and its time-course. We therefore investigated the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli as indicators of biased information processing with an ambiguous cue-conditioning paradigm. In an acquisition phase, participants learned to discriminate two tones of different frequency, which acquired emotional and motivational value due to subsequent feedback (monetary gain or avoidance of monetary loss). In the test phase, three additional tones of intermediate frequencies were presented, whose interpretation as positive (approach of reward) or negative (avoidance of punishment), indicated by a button press, was used as an indicator of the bias. Twenty healthy volunteers participated in this paradigm while a 64-channel electroencephalogram was recorded. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing individual differences in depression and rumination. Overall, we found a small positive bias, which correlated negatively with reflective pondering, a type of rumination. As expected, reaction times were increased for intermediate tones. ERP amplitudes between 300 and 700 ms post-stimulus differed depending on the interpretation of the intermediate tones. A negative compared to a positive interpretation led to an amplitude increase over frontal electrodes. Our study provides evidence that in humans, as in animal research, the ambiguous cue-conditioning paradigm is a valid procedure for indirectly assessing ambiguous cue interpretation and a potential interpretation bias, which is sensitive to individual differences in affect-related traits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3679614/ /pubmed/23781193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00272 Text en Copyright © 2013 Schick, Wessa, Vollmayr, Kuehner and Kanske. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Schick, Anita
Wessa, Michèle
Vollmayr, Barbara
Kuehner, Christine
Kanske, Philipp
Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates
title Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates
title_full Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates
title_fullStr Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates
title_full_unstemmed Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates
title_short Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates
title_sort indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00272
work_keys_str_mv AT schickanita indirectassessmentofaninterpretationbiasinhumansneurophysiologicalandbehavioralcorrelates
AT wessamichele indirectassessmentofaninterpretationbiasinhumansneurophysiologicalandbehavioralcorrelates
AT vollmayrbarbara indirectassessmentofaninterpretationbiasinhumansneurophysiologicalandbehavioralcorrelates
AT kuehnerchristine indirectassessmentofaninterpretationbiasinhumansneurophysiologicalandbehavioralcorrelates
AT kanskephilipp indirectassessmentofaninterpretationbiasinhumansneurophysiologicalandbehavioralcorrelates