Cargando…

Feasibility and radiation induced toxicity regarding the first application of transperineal implementation of biocompatible balloon for high dose radiotherapy in patients with prostate carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of the transperineal implementation of biocompatible balloon (Prospace) and the acute toxicity of high dose 3DCRT in patients with localized low risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2011 and April 2012, fifteen patients were treated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kouloulias, Vassilis, Kalogeropoulos, Theodoros, Platoni, Kalliopi, Georgakopoulos, John, Matsopoulos, George, Chaldeopoulos, Dimitris, Beli, Ivelina, Pantelakos, Panagiotis, Asimakopoulos, Charalambos, Kouvaris, John, Kelekis, Nikolaos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23566526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-82
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of the transperineal implementation of biocompatible balloon (Prospace) and the acute toxicity of high dose 3DCRT in patients with localized low risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2011 and April 2012, fifteen patients were treated with external 3DCRT consisted of 76–78 Gy in 38–39 daily fractions (2.0 Gy/ fraction). Before 3DCRT, we placed the Prospace though the perineum by a minimally invasive procedure in the intermediate space between the rectum and the prostate. The primary study endpoint was the evaluation of acute toxicity according to the EORTC/RTOG radiation toxicity scale. Erectile function was evaluated with the IIEF-5 questionnaire. Rectosigmoidoscopy was performed at baseline, at the end of 3DCRT and 3 months thereafter in order to assess also the rectal toxicity according to Subjective-RectoSigmoid (S-RS) scale. The evaluation of pain related to Prospace implementation was done with the visual analogue score (VAS). RESULTS: The acute toxicities were as follows: grade I GI toxicity in two patients and for GU toxicity, three patients with grade I of nocturia, four patients with grade I of frequency, two patients with grade I and two patients with grade II of dysouria. The mean score of rectal toxicity according to S-RS score was 1.8(±0.6). The mean VAS score related to Prospace was 1.4(±0.5). Erectile function was unchanged. The Prospace device was found stable in sequential CTs during irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of PROSPACE was feasible, while the acute radiation toxicity was low and comparable with IMRT techniques.