Cargando…

Reliability of the Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost Epstein–Barr Virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the Merifluor Epstein–Barr Virus immunofluorescence assay

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection is routinely conducted by clinical laboratories, especially to diagnose infectious mononucleosis. At an estimated general population incidence of 1:200, this represents a potentially significant testing burden. We evaluated the reliability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kreuzer, Christina, Nabeck, Klaus Udo, Levy, H Roma, Daghofer, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23731557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-260
_version_ 1782273020573777920
author Kreuzer, Christina
Nabeck, Klaus Udo
Levy, H Roma
Daghofer, Elisabeth
author_facet Kreuzer, Christina
Nabeck, Klaus Udo
Levy, H Roma
Daghofer, Elisabeth
author_sort Kreuzer, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection is routinely conducted by clinical laboratories, especially to diagnose infectious mononucleosis. At an estimated general population incidence of 1:200, this represents a potentially significant testing burden. We evaluated the reliability of the Siemens Novagnost® and Enzygnost® EBV microtiter assays measuring VCA IgM and IgG, and EBNA-1 IgG for clinical diagnosis of EBV-related infectious mononucleosis. METHODS: Remnant sera from 537 patients tested for EBV infection were used to compare the Siemens assays to each other and to the Merifluor assay. The Siemens assays are qualitative/semiquantitative, automatable enzyme immunoassays. The Merifluor assays are manual, qualitative indirect immunofluorescent assays. Testing was conducted on the Siemens and Merifluor assays in parallel. All assays were conducted and interpreted according to each manufacturer’s specifications. Agreement of serostatus between each of the three assays was assessed. Discrepant results were resolved using a third method (Mikrogen recomLine). RESULTS: Final EBV serostatus indicated 2.9% of the population had an acute infection, 89.6% had a past infection, and 7.5% were EBV naive. All three assays demonstrated 100% agreement with acute infection. Agreement with past-infection serostatus was 99.1% for Enzygnost, between 86% and 98.8% for Novagnost, and 98.1% for Merifluor. Seronegative agreement was 100% for Enzygnost, 89.7% for Novagnost, and 92.3% for Merifluor. CONCLUSIONS: The Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost EBV microtiter assays are suitable for clinical rule-in of acute EBV infection and for identifying EBV-naive individuals. Both assays also adequately identify remote EBV infections. Because these assays can be automated, they can improve speed and efficiency of EBV testing, especially in high-volume laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3679805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36798052013-06-13 Reliability of the Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost Epstein–Barr Virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the Merifluor Epstein–Barr Virus immunofluorescence assay Kreuzer, Christina Nabeck, Klaus Udo Levy, H Roma Daghofer, Elisabeth BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection is routinely conducted by clinical laboratories, especially to diagnose infectious mononucleosis. At an estimated general population incidence of 1:200, this represents a potentially significant testing burden. We evaluated the reliability of the Siemens Novagnost® and Enzygnost® EBV microtiter assays measuring VCA IgM and IgG, and EBNA-1 IgG for clinical diagnosis of EBV-related infectious mononucleosis. METHODS: Remnant sera from 537 patients tested for EBV infection were used to compare the Siemens assays to each other and to the Merifluor assay. The Siemens assays are qualitative/semiquantitative, automatable enzyme immunoassays. The Merifluor assays are manual, qualitative indirect immunofluorescent assays. Testing was conducted on the Siemens and Merifluor assays in parallel. All assays were conducted and interpreted according to each manufacturer’s specifications. Agreement of serostatus between each of the three assays was assessed. Discrepant results were resolved using a third method (Mikrogen recomLine). RESULTS: Final EBV serostatus indicated 2.9% of the population had an acute infection, 89.6% had a past infection, and 7.5% were EBV naive. All three assays demonstrated 100% agreement with acute infection. Agreement with past-infection serostatus was 99.1% for Enzygnost, between 86% and 98.8% for Novagnost, and 98.1% for Merifluor. Seronegative agreement was 100% for Enzygnost, 89.7% for Novagnost, and 92.3% for Merifluor. CONCLUSIONS: The Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost EBV microtiter assays are suitable for clinical rule-in of acute EBV infection and for identifying EBV-naive individuals. Both assays also adequately identify remote EBV infections. Because these assays can be automated, they can improve speed and efficiency of EBV testing, especially in high-volume laboratories. BioMed Central 2013-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3679805/ /pubmed/23731557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-260 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kreuzer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kreuzer, Christina
Nabeck, Klaus Udo
Levy, H Roma
Daghofer, Elisabeth
Reliability of the Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost Epstein–Barr Virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the Merifluor Epstein–Barr Virus immunofluorescence assay
title Reliability of the Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost Epstein–Barr Virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the Merifluor Epstein–Barr Virus immunofluorescence assay
title_full Reliability of the Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost Epstein–Barr Virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the Merifluor Epstein–Barr Virus immunofluorescence assay
title_fullStr Reliability of the Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost Epstein–Barr Virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the Merifluor Epstein–Barr Virus immunofluorescence assay
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost Epstein–Barr Virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the Merifluor Epstein–Barr Virus immunofluorescence assay
title_short Reliability of the Siemens Enzygnost and Novagnost Epstein–Barr Virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the Merifluor Epstein–Barr Virus immunofluorescence assay
title_sort reliability of the siemens enzygnost and novagnost epstein–barr virus assays for routine laboratory diagnosis: agreement with clinical diagnosis and comparison with the merifluor epstein–barr virus immunofluorescence assay
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23731557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-260
work_keys_str_mv AT kreuzerchristina reliabilityofthesiemensenzygnostandnovagnostepsteinbarrvirusassaysforroutinelaboratorydiagnosisagreementwithclinicaldiagnosisandcomparisonwiththemerifluorepsteinbarrvirusimmunofluorescenceassay
AT nabeckklausudo reliabilityofthesiemensenzygnostandnovagnostepsteinbarrvirusassaysforroutinelaboratorydiagnosisagreementwithclinicaldiagnosisandcomparisonwiththemerifluorepsteinbarrvirusimmunofluorescenceassay
AT levyhroma reliabilityofthesiemensenzygnostandnovagnostepsteinbarrvirusassaysforroutinelaboratorydiagnosisagreementwithclinicaldiagnosisandcomparisonwiththemerifluorepsteinbarrvirusimmunofluorescenceassay
AT daghoferelisabeth reliabilityofthesiemensenzygnostandnovagnostepsteinbarrvirusassaysforroutinelaboratorydiagnosisagreementwithclinicaldiagnosisandcomparisonwiththemerifluorepsteinbarrvirusimmunofluorescenceassay