Cargando…
Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is recommended in septic shock and the majority of these patients receive RBC transfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, benefit and harm of RBCs have not been established in this group of high-risk patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The Transfusio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23702006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-150 |
_version_ | 1782273034168565760 |
---|---|
author | Holst, Lars B Haase, Nicolai Wetterslev, Jørn Wernerman, Jan Åneman, Anders Guttormsen, Anne B Johansson, Pär I Karlsson, Sari Klemenzson, Gudmundur Winding, Robert Nebrich, Lars Albeck, Carsten Vang, Marianne L Bülow, Hans-Henrik Elkjær, Jeanie M Nielsen, Jane S Kirkegaard, Peter Nibro, Helle Lindhardt, Anne Strange, Ditte Thormar, Katrin Poulsen, Lone M Berezowicz, Pawel Bådstøløkken, Per M Strand, Kristian Cronhjort, Maria Haunstrup, Elsebeth Rian, Omar Oldner, Anders Bendtsen, Asger Iversen, Susanne Langva, Jørn-Åge Johansen, Rasmus B Nielsen, Niklas Pettilä, Ville Reinikainen, Matti Keld, Dorte Leivdal, Siv Breider, Jan-Michael Tjäder, Inga Reiter, Nanna Gøttrup, Ulf White, Jonathan Wiis, Jørgen Andersen, Lasse Høgh Steensen, Morten Perner, Anders |
author_facet | Holst, Lars B Haase, Nicolai Wetterslev, Jørn Wernerman, Jan Åneman, Anders Guttormsen, Anne B Johansson, Pär I Karlsson, Sari Klemenzson, Gudmundur Winding, Robert Nebrich, Lars Albeck, Carsten Vang, Marianne L Bülow, Hans-Henrik Elkjær, Jeanie M Nielsen, Jane S Kirkegaard, Peter Nibro, Helle Lindhardt, Anne Strange, Ditte Thormar, Katrin Poulsen, Lone M Berezowicz, Pawel Bådstøløkken, Per M Strand, Kristian Cronhjort, Maria Haunstrup, Elsebeth Rian, Omar Oldner, Anders Bendtsen, Asger Iversen, Susanne Langva, Jørn-Åge Johansen, Rasmus B Nielsen, Niklas Pettilä, Ville Reinikainen, Matti Keld, Dorte Leivdal, Siv Breider, Jan-Michael Tjäder, Inga Reiter, Nanna Gøttrup, Ulf White, Jonathan Wiis, Jørgen Andersen, Lasse Høgh Steensen, Morten Perner, Anders |
author_sort | Holst, Lars B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is recommended in septic shock and the majority of these patients receive RBC transfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, benefit and harm of RBCs have not been established in this group of high-risk patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial is a multicenter trial with assessor-blinded outcome assessment, randomising 1,000 patients with septic shock in 30 Scandinavian ICUs to receive transfusion with pre-storage leuko-depleted RBC suspended in saline-adenine-glucose and mannitol (SAGM) at haemoglobin level (Hb) of 7 g/dl or 9 g/dl, stratified by the presence of haematological malignancy and centre. The primary outcome measure is 90-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures are organ failure, ischaemic events, severe adverse reactions (SARs: anaphylactic reaction, acute haemolytic reaction and transfusion-related circulatory overload, and acute lung injury) and mortality at 28 days, 6 months and 1 year. The sample size will enable us to detect a 9% absolute difference in 90-day mortality assuming a 45% event rate with a type 1 error rate of 5% and power of 80%. An interim analysis will be performed after 500 patients, and the Data Monitoring and Safety Committee will recommend the trial be stopped if a group difference in 90-day mortality with P ≤0.001 is present at this point. DISCUSSION: The TRISS trial may bridge the gap between clinical practice and the lack of efficacy and safety data on RBC transfusion in septic shock patients. The effect of restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion strategy on mortality, organ failure, ischaemic events and SARs will be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01485315. Registration date 30 November 2011. First patient was randomised 3 December 2011. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3679866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36798662013-06-13 Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Holst, Lars B Haase, Nicolai Wetterslev, Jørn Wernerman, Jan Åneman, Anders Guttormsen, Anne B Johansson, Pär I Karlsson, Sari Klemenzson, Gudmundur Winding, Robert Nebrich, Lars Albeck, Carsten Vang, Marianne L Bülow, Hans-Henrik Elkjær, Jeanie M Nielsen, Jane S Kirkegaard, Peter Nibro, Helle Lindhardt, Anne Strange, Ditte Thormar, Katrin Poulsen, Lone M Berezowicz, Pawel Bådstøløkken, Per M Strand, Kristian Cronhjort, Maria Haunstrup, Elsebeth Rian, Omar Oldner, Anders Bendtsen, Asger Iversen, Susanne Langva, Jørn-Åge Johansen, Rasmus B Nielsen, Niklas Pettilä, Ville Reinikainen, Matti Keld, Dorte Leivdal, Siv Breider, Jan-Michael Tjäder, Inga Reiter, Nanna Gøttrup, Ulf White, Jonathan Wiis, Jørgen Andersen, Lasse Høgh Steensen, Morten Perner, Anders Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is recommended in septic shock and the majority of these patients receive RBC transfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, benefit and harm of RBCs have not been established in this group of high-risk patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial is a multicenter trial with assessor-blinded outcome assessment, randomising 1,000 patients with septic shock in 30 Scandinavian ICUs to receive transfusion with pre-storage leuko-depleted RBC suspended in saline-adenine-glucose and mannitol (SAGM) at haemoglobin level (Hb) of 7 g/dl or 9 g/dl, stratified by the presence of haematological malignancy and centre. The primary outcome measure is 90-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures are organ failure, ischaemic events, severe adverse reactions (SARs: anaphylactic reaction, acute haemolytic reaction and transfusion-related circulatory overload, and acute lung injury) and mortality at 28 days, 6 months and 1 year. The sample size will enable us to detect a 9% absolute difference in 90-day mortality assuming a 45% event rate with a type 1 error rate of 5% and power of 80%. An interim analysis will be performed after 500 patients, and the Data Monitoring and Safety Committee will recommend the trial be stopped if a group difference in 90-day mortality with P ≤0.001 is present at this point. DISCUSSION: The TRISS trial may bridge the gap between clinical practice and the lack of efficacy and safety data on RBC transfusion in septic shock patients. The effect of restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion strategy on mortality, organ failure, ischaemic events and SARs will be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01485315. Registration date 30 November 2011. First patient was randomised 3 December 2011. BioMed Central 2013-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3679866/ /pubmed/23702006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-150 Text en Copyright © 2013 Holst et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Holst, Lars B Haase, Nicolai Wetterslev, Jørn Wernerman, Jan Åneman, Anders Guttormsen, Anne B Johansson, Pär I Karlsson, Sari Klemenzson, Gudmundur Winding, Robert Nebrich, Lars Albeck, Carsten Vang, Marianne L Bülow, Hans-Henrik Elkjær, Jeanie M Nielsen, Jane S Kirkegaard, Peter Nibro, Helle Lindhardt, Anne Strange, Ditte Thormar, Katrin Poulsen, Lone M Berezowicz, Pawel Bådstøløkken, Per M Strand, Kristian Cronhjort, Maria Haunstrup, Elsebeth Rian, Omar Oldner, Anders Bendtsen, Asger Iversen, Susanne Langva, Jørn-Åge Johansen, Rasmus B Nielsen, Niklas Pettilä, Ville Reinikainen, Matti Keld, Dorte Leivdal, Siv Breider, Jan-Michael Tjäder, Inga Reiter, Nanna Gøttrup, Ulf White, Jonathan Wiis, Jørgen Andersen, Lasse Høgh Steensen, Morten Perner, Anders Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | transfusion requirements in septic shock (triss) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the icu: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23702006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holstlarsb transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haasenicolai transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wetterslevjørn transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wernermanjan transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT anemananders transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT guttormsenanneb transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT johanssonpari transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT karlssonsari transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT klemenzsongudmundur transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT windingrobert transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nebrichlars transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT albeckcarsten transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vangmariannel transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bulowhanshenrik transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT elkjærjeaniem transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nielsenjanes transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kirkegaardpeter transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nibrohelle transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lindhardtanne transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT strangeditte transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thormarkatrin transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT poulsenlonem transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT berezowiczpawel transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT badstøløkkenperm transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT strandkristian transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cronhjortmaria transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haunstrupelsebeth transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rianomar transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT oldneranders transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bendtsenasger transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT iversensusanne transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT langvajørnage transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT johansenrasmusb transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nielsenniklas transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pettilaville transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT reinikainenmatti transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kelddorte transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leivdalsiv transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT breiderjanmichael transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tjaderinga transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT reiternanna transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gøttrupulf transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT whitejonathan transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wiisjørgen transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT andersenlassehøgh transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT steensenmorten transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT perneranders transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |