Cargando…

Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is recommended in septic shock and the majority of these patients receive RBC transfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, benefit and harm of RBCs have not been established in this group of high-risk patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The Transfusio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holst, Lars B, Haase, Nicolai, Wetterslev, Jørn, Wernerman, Jan, Åneman, Anders, Guttormsen, Anne B, Johansson, Pär I, Karlsson, Sari, Klemenzson, Gudmundur, Winding, Robert, Nebrich, Lars, Albeck, Carsten, Vang, Marianne L, Bülow, Hans-Henrik, Elkjær, Jeanie M, Nielsen, Jane S, Kirkegaard, Peter, Nibro, Helle, Lindhardt, Anne, Strange, Ditte, Thormar, Katrin, Poulsen, Lone M, Berezowicz, Pawel, Bådstøløkken, Per M, Strand, Kristian, Cronhjort, Maria, Haunstrup, Elsebeth, Rian, Omar, Oldner, Anders, Bendtsen, Asger, Iversen, Susanne, Langva, Jørn-Åge, Johansen, Rasmus B, Nielsen, Niklas, Pettilä, Ville, Reinikainen, Matti, Keld, Dorte, Leivdal, Siv, Breider, Jan-Michael, Tjäder, Inga, Reiter, Nanna, Gøttrup, Ulf, White, Jonathan, Wiis, Jørgen, Andersen, Lasse Høgh, Steensen, Morten, Perner, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23702006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-150
_version_ 1782273034168565760
author Holst, Lars B
Haase, Nicolai
Wetterslev, Jørn
Wernerman, Jan
Åneman, Anders
Guttormsen, Anne B
Johansson, Pär I
Karlsson, Sari
Klemenzson, Gudmundur
Winding, Robert
Nebrich, Lars
Albeck, Carsten
Vang, Marianne L
Bülow, Hans-Henrik
Elkjær, Jeanie M
Nielsen, Jane S
Kirkegaard, Peter
Nibro, Helle
Lindhardt, Anne
Strange, Ditte
Thormar, Katrin
Poulsen, Lone M
Berezowicz, Pawel
Bådstøløkken, Per M
Strand, Kristian
Cronhjort, Maria
Haunstrup, Elsebeth
Rian, Omar
Oldner, Anders
Bendtsen, Asger
Iversen, Susanne
Langva, Jørn-Åge
Johansen, Rasmus B
Nielsen, Niklas
Pettilä, Ville
Reinikainen, Matti
Keld, Dorte
Leivdal, Siv
Breider, Jan-Michael
Tjäder, Inga
Reiter, Nanna
Gøttrup, Ulf
White, Jonathan
Wiis, Jørgen
Andersen, Lasse Høgh
Steensen, Morten
Perner, Anders
author_facet Holst, Lars B
Haase, Nicolai
Wetterslev, Jørn
Wernerman, Jan
Åneman, Anders
Guttormsen, Anne B
Johansson, Pär I
Karlsson, Sari
Klemenzson, Gudmundur
Winding, Robert
Nebrich, Lars
Albeck, Carsten
Vang, Marianne L
Bülow, Hans-Henrik
Elkjær, Jeanie M
Nielsen, Jane S
Kirkegaard, Peter
Nibro, Helle
Lindhardt, Anne
Strange, Ditte
Thormar, Katrin
Poulsen, Lone M
Berezowicz, Pawel
Bådstøløkken, Per M
Strand, Kristian
Cronhjort, Maria
Haunstrup, Elsebeth
Rian, Omar
Oldner, Anders
Bendtsen, Asger
Iversen, Susanne
Langva, Jørn-Åge
Johansen, Rasmus B
Nielsen, Niklas
Pettilä, Ville
Reinikainen, Matti
Keld, Dorte
Leivdal, Siv
Breider, Jan-Michael
Tjäder, Inga
Reiter, Nanna
Gøttrup, Ulf
White, Jonathan
Wiis, Jørgen
Andersen, Lasse Høgh
Steensen, Morten
Perner, Anders
author_sort Holst, Lars B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is recommended in septic shock and the majority of these patients receive RBC transfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, benefit and harm of RBCs have not been established in this group of high-risk patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial is a multicenter trial with assessor-blinded outcome assessment, randomising 1,000 patients with septic shock in 30 Scandinavian ICUs to receive transfusion with pre-storage leuko-depleted RBC suspended in saline-adenine-glucose and mannitol (SAGM) at haemoglobin level (Hb) of 7 g/dl or 9 g/dl, stratified by the presence of haematological malignancy and centre. The primary outcome measure is 90-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures are organ failure, ischaemic events, severe adverse reactions (SARs: anaphylactic reaction, acute haemolytic reaction and transfusion-related circulatory overload, and acute lung injury) and mortality at 28 days, 6 months and 1 year. The sample size will enable us to detect a 9% absolute difference in 90-day mortality assuming a 45% event rate with a type 1 error rate of 5% and power of 80%. An interim analysis will be performed after 500 patients, and the Data Monitoring and Safety Committee will recommend the trial be stopped if a group difference in 90-day mortality with P ≤0.001 is present at this point. DISCUSSION: The TRISS trial may bridge the gap between clinical practice and the lack of efficacy and safety data on RBC transfusion in septic shock patients. The effect of restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion strategy on mortality, organ failure, ischaemic events and SARs will be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01485315. Registration date 30 November 2011. First patient was randomised 3 December 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3679866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36798662013-06-13 Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Holst, Lars B Haase, Nicolai Wetterslev, Jørn Wernerman, Jan Åneman, Anders Guttormsen, Anne B Johansson, Pär I Karlsson, Sari Klemenzson, Gudmundur Winding, Robert Nebrich, Lars Albeck, Carsten Vang, Marianne L Bülow, Hans-Henrik Elkjær, Jeanie M Nielsen, Jane S Kirkegaard, Peter Nibro, Helle Lindhardt, Anne Strange, Ditte Thormar, Katrin Poulsen, Lone M Berezowicz, Pawel Bådstøløkken, Per M Strand, Kristian Cronhjort, Maria Haunstrup, Elsebeth Rian, Omar Oldner, Anders Bendtsen, Asger Iversen, Susanne Langva, Jørn-Åge Johansen, Rasmus B Nielsen, Niklas Pettilä, Ville Reinikainen, Matti Keld, Dorte Leivdal, Siv Breider, Jan-Michael Tjäder, Inga Reiter, Nanna Gøttrup, Ulf White, Jonathan Wiis, Jørgen Andersen, Lasse Høgh Steensen, Morten Perner, Anders Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is recommended in septic shock and the majority of these patients receive RBC transfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, benefit and harm of RBCs have not been established in this group of high-risk patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial is a multicenter trial with assessor-blinded outcome assessment, randomising 1,000 patients with septic shock in 30 Scandinavian ICUs to receive transfusion with pre-storage leuko-depleted RBC suspended in saline-adenine-glucose and mannitol (SAGM) at haemoglobin level (Hb) of 7 g/dl or 9 g/dl, stratified by the presence of haematological malignancy and centre. The primary outcome measure is 90-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures are organ failure, ischaemic events, severe adverse reactions (SARs: anaphylactic reaction, acute haemolytic reaction and transfusion-related circulatory overload, and acute lung injury) and mortality at 28 days, 6 months and 1 year. The sample size will enable us to detect a 9% absolute difference in 90-day mortality assuming a 45% event rate with a type 1 error rate of 5% and power of 80%. An interim analysis will be performed after 500 patients, and the Data Monitoring and Safety Committee will recommend the trial be stopped if a group difference in 90-day mortality with P ≤0.001 is present at this point. DISCUSSION: The TRISS trial may bridge the gap between clinical practice and the lack of efficacy and safety data on RBC transfusion in septic shock patients. The effect of restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion strategy on mortality, organ failure, ischaemic events and SARs will be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01485315. Registration date 30 November 2011. First patient was randomised 3 December 2011. BioMed Central 2013-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3679866/ /pubmed/23702006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-150 Text en Copyright © 2013 Holst et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Holst, Lars B
Haase, Nicolai
Wetterslev, Jørn
Wernerman, Jan
Åneman, Anders
Guttormsen, Anne B
Johansson, Pär I
Karlsson, Sari
Klemenzson, Gudmundur
Winding, Robert
Nebrich, Lars
Albeck, Carsten
Vang, Marianne L
Bülow, Hans-Henrik
Elkjær, Jeanie M
Nielsen, Jane S
Kirkegaard, Peter
Nibro, Helle
Lindhardt, Anne
Strange, Ditte
Thormar, Katrin
Poulsen, Lone M
Berezowicz, Pawel
Bådstøløkken, Per M
Strand, Kristian
Cronhjort, Maria
Haunstrup, Elsebeth
Rian, Omar
Oldner, Anders
Bendtsen, Asger
Iversen, Susanne
Langva, Jørn-Åge
Johansen, Rasmus B
Nielsen, Niklas
Pettilä, Ville
Reinikainen, Matti
Keld, Dorte
Leivdal, Siv
Breider, Jan-Michael
Tjäder, Inga
Reiter, Nanna
Gøttrup, Ulf
White, Jonathan
Wiis, Jørgen
Andersen, Lasse Høgh
Steensen, Morten
Perner, Anders
Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort transfusion requirements in septic shock (triss) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the icu: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23702006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-150
work_keys_str_mv AT holstlarsb transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haasenicolai transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wetterslevjørn transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wernermanjan transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT anemananders transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT guttormsenanneb transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johanssonpari transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT karlssonsari transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT klemenzsongudmundur transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT windingrobert transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nebrichlars transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT albeckcarsten transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vangmariannel transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bulowhanshenrik transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT elkjærjeaniem transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nielsenjanes transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kirkegaardpeter transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nibrohelle transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lindhardtanne transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT strangeditte transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thormarkatrin transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT poulsenlonem transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT berezowiczpawel transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT badstøløkkenperm transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT strandkristian transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cronhjortmaria transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haunstrupelsebeth transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rianomar transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT oldneranders transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bendtsenasger transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT iversensusanne transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT langvajørnage transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johansenrasmusb transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nielsenniklas transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pettilaville transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reinikainenmatti transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kelddorte transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leivdalsiv transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT breiderjanmichael transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tjaderinga transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reiternanna transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gøttrupulf transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT whitejonathan transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wiisjørgen transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT andersenlassehøgh transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT steensenmorten transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT perneranders transfusionrequirementsinsepticshocktrisstrialcomparingtheeffectsandsafetyofliberalversusrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusioninsepticshockpatientsintheicuprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial