Cargando…

Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators

BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare aggressive malignant neoplasm. The purposes of this study are to review the pathologic features and clinical outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma and to evaluate the prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Yanni, Liu, Xiaolong, Zhang, Guoqiang, Song, Hongtao, Ren, Yanlv, He, Xiaoguang, Wang, Yanbo, Zhang, Jinfeng, Zhang, Youxue, Sun, Shanshan, Liang, Xiaoshuan, Sun, Qian, Pang, Da
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23738706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-129
_version_ 1782273052975824896
author Song, Yanni
Liu, Xiaolong
Zhang, Guoqiang
Song, Hongtao
Ren, Yanlv
He, Xiaoguang
Wang, Yanbo
Zhang, Jinfeng
Zhang, Youxue
Sun, Shanshan
Liang, Xiaoshuan
Sun, Qian
Pang, Da
author_facet Song, Yanni
Liu, Xiaolong
Zhang, Guoqiang
Song, Hongtao
Ren, Yanlv
He, Xiaoguang
Wang, Yanbo
Zhang, Jinfeng
Zhang, Youxue
Sun, Shanshan
Liang, Xiaoshuan
Sun, Qian
Pang, Da
author_sort Song, Yanni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare aggressive malignant neoplasm. The purposes of this study are to review the pathologic features and clinical outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma and to evaluate the prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma. METHODS: The cases of 55 patients with metaplastic breast carcinomapresenting between 1991 and 2006 were analyzed and compared to the cases of 767 age-matched patients with invasive ductal carcinoma from the same time period. RESULTS: The group of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma presented with a larger tumor size, lower lymph node involvement, higher percentage of triple-negative (estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative) cases, and Ki-67 over-expression compared with the group of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Patients in the metaplastic breast carcinoma group tended to have more local (often chest wall) recurrences (P = 0.038) and distant (often lung) metastases (P = 0.001) than those in the invasive ductal carcinomas group. The prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma was poorer than that of invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas; the 5-year overall survival rate was 54.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 85.1% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 73.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 45.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 71.2% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 60.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67≥14% were significantly related to 5-year overall survival (P = 0.010; P = 0.010; P = 0.035) and 5-year disease-free survival (P = 0.020; P = 0.018; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Metaplastic breast carcinoma shows a poorer prognosis than both invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67 ≥14% indicate a poor prognosis in patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3679991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36799912013-06-13 Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators Song, Yanni Liu, Xiaolong Zhang, Guoqiang Song, Hongtao Ren, Yanlv He, Xiaoguang Wang, Yanbo Zhang, Jinfeng Zhang, Youxue Sun, Shanshan Liang, Xiaoshuan Sun, Qian Pang, Da World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare aggressive malignant neoplasm. The purposes of this study are to review the pathologic features and clinical outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma and to evaluate the prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma. METHODS: The cases of 55 patients with metaplastic breast carcinomapresenting between 1991 and 2006 were analyzed and compared to the cases of 767 age-matched patients with invasive ductal carcinoma from the same time period. RESULTS: The group of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma presented with a larger tumor size, lower lymph node involvement, higher percentage of triple-negative (estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative) cases, and Ki-67 over-expression compared with the group of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Patients in the metaplastic breast carcinoma group tended to have more local (often chest wall) recurrences (P = 0.038) and distant (often lung) metastases (P = 0.001) than those in the invasive ductal carcinomas group. The prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma was poorer than that of invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas; the 5-year overall survival rate was 54.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 85.1% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 73.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 45.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 71.2% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 60.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67≥14% were significantly related to 5-year overall survival (P = 0.010; P = 0.010; P = 0.035) and 5-year disease-free survival (P = 0.020; P = 0.018; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Metaplastic breast carcinoma shows a poorer prognosis than both invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67 ≥14% indicate a poor prognosis in patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma. BioMed Central 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3679991/ /pubmed/23738706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-129 Text en Copyright ©2013 Song et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Song, Yanni
Liu, Xiaolong
Zhang, Guoqiang
Song, Hongtao
Ren, Yanlv
He, Xiaoguang
Wang, Yanbo
Zhang, Jinfeng
Zhang, Youxue
Sun, Shanshan
Liang, Xiaoshuan
Sun, Qian
Pang, Da
Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators
title Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators
title_full Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators
title_fullStr Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators
title_full_unstemmed Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators
title_short Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators
title_sort unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23738706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-129
work_keys_str_mv AT songyanni uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT liuxiaolong uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT zhangguoqiang uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT songhongtao uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT renyanlv uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT hexiaoguang uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT wangyanbo uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT zhangjinfeng uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT zhangyouxue uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT sunshanshan uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT liangxiaoshuan uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT sunqian uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators
AT pangda uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators