Cargando…
Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators
BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare aggressive malignant neoplasm. The purposes of this study are to review the pathologic features and clinical outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma and to evaluate the prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23738706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-129 |
_version_ | 1782273052975824896 |
---|---|
author | Song, Yanni Liu, Xiaolong Zhang, Guoqiang Song, Hongtao Ren, Yanlv He, Xiaoguang Wang, Yanbo Zhang, Jinfeng Zhang, Youxue Sun, Shanshan Liang, Xiaoshuan Sun, Qian Pang, Da |
author_facet | Song, Yanni Liu, Xiaolong Zhang, Guoqiang Song, Hongtao Ren, Yanlv He, Xiaoguang Wang, Yanbo Zhang, Jinfeng Zhang, Youxue Sun, Shanshan Liang, Xiaoshuan Sun, Qian Pang, Da |
author_sort | Song, Yanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare aggressive malignant neoplasm. The purposes of this study are to review the pathologic features and clinical outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma and to evaluate the prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma. METHODS: The cases of 55 patients with metaplastic breast carcinomapresenting between 1991 and 2006 were analyzed and compared to the cases of 767 age-matched patients with invasive ductal carcinoma from the same time period. RESULTS: The group of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma presented with a larger tumor size, lower lymph node involvement, higher percentage of triple-negative (estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative) cases, and Ki-67 over-expression compared with the group of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Patients in the metaplastic breast carcinoma group tended to have more local (often chest wall) recurrences (P = 0.038) and distant (often lung) metastases (P = 0.001) than those in the invasive ductal carcinomas group. The prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma was poorer than that of invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas; the 5-year overall survival rate was 54.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 85.1% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 73.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 45.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 71.2% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 60.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67≥14% were significantly related to 5-year overall survival (P = 0.010; P = 0.010; P = 0.035) and 5-year disease-free survival (P = 0.020; P = 0.018; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Metaplastic breast carcinoma shows a poorer prognosis than both invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67 ≥14% indicate a poor prognosis in patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3679991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36799912013-06-13 Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators Song, Yanni Liu, Xiaolong Zhang, Guoqiang Song, Hongtao Ren, Yanlv He, Xiaoguang Wang, Yanbo Zhang, Jinfeng Zhang, Youxue Sun, Shanshan Liang, Xiaoshuan Sun, Qian Pang, Da World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare aggressive malignant neoplasm. The purposes of this study are to review the pathologic features and clinical outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma and to evaluate the prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma. METHODS: The cases of 55 patients with metaplastic breast carcinomapresenting between 1991 and 2006 were analyzed and compared to the cases of 767 age-matched patients with invasive ductal carcinoma from the same time period. RESULTS: The group of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma presented with a larger tumor size, lower lymph node involvement, higher percentage of triple-negative (estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative) cases, and Ki-67 over-expression compared with the group of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Patients in the metaplastic breast carcinoma group tended to have more local (often chest wall) recurrences (P = 0.038) and distant (often lung) metastases (P = 0.001) than those in the invasive ductal carcinomas group. The prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma was poorer than that of invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas; the 5-year overall survival rate was 54.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 85.1% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 73.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 45.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 71.2% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 60.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67≥14% were significantly related to 5-year overall survival (P = 0.010; P = 0.010; P = 0.035) and 5-year disease-free survival (P = 0.020; P = 0.018; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Metaplastic breast carcinoma shows a poorer prognosis than both invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67 ≥14% indicate a poor prognosis in patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma. BioMed Central 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3679991/ /pubmed/23738706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-129 Text en Copyright ©2013 Song et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Song, Yanni Liu, Xiaolong Zhang, Guoqiang Song, Hongtao Ren, Yanlv He, Xiaoguang Wang, Yanbo Zhang, Jinfeng Zhang, Youxue Sun, Shanshan Liang, Xiaoshuan Sun, Qian Pang, Da Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators |
title | Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators |
title_full | Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators |
title_fullStr | Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators |
title_full_unstemmed | Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators |
title_short | Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators |
title_sort | unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23738706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songyanni uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT liuxiaolong uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT zhangguoqiang uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT songhongtao uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT renyanlv uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT hexiaoguang uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT wangyanbo uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT zhangjinfeng uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT zhangyouxue uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT sunshanshan uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT liangxiaoshuan uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT sunqian uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators AT pangda uniqueclinicopathologicalfeaturesofmetaplasticbreastcarcinomacomparedwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaandpoorprognosticindicators |