Cargando…

Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?

BACKGROUND: Patient involvement in health care decision making is part of a wider trend towards a more bottom-up approach to service planning and provision, and patient experience is increasingly conceptualized as a core dimension of health care quality. The aim of this multi-level study is two-fold...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiig, Siri, Storm, Marianne, Aase, Karina, Gjestsen, Martha Therese, Solheim, Marit, Harthug, Stig, Robert, Glenn, Fulop, Naomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23742265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-206
_version_ 1782273063324221440
author Wiig, Siri
Storm, Marianne
Aase, Karina
Gjestsen, Martha Therese
Solheim, Marit
Harthug, Stig
Robert, Glenn
Fulop, Naomi
author_facet Wiig, Siri
Storm, Marianne
Aase, Karina
Gjestsen, Martha Therese
Solheim, Marit
Harthug, Stig
Robert, Glenn
Fulop, Naomi
author_sort Wiig, Siri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient involvement in health care decision making is part of a wider trend towards a more bottom-up approach to service planning and provision, and patient experience is increasingly conceptualized as a core dimension of health care quality. The aim of this multi-level study is two-fold: 1) to describe and analyze how governmental organizations expect acute hospitals to incorporate patient involvement and patient experiences into their quality improvement (QI) efforts and 2) to analyze how patient involvement and patient experiences are used by hospitals to try to improve the quality of care they provide. METHODS: This multi-level case study combines analysis of national policy documents and regulations at the macro level with semi-structured interviews and non-participant observation of key meetings and shadowing of staff at the meso and micro levels in two purposively sampled Norwegian hospitals. Fieldwork at the meso and micro levels was undertaken over a 12-month period (2011–2012). RESULTS: Governmental documents and regulations at the macro level demonstrated wide-ranging expectations for the integration of patient involvement and patient experiences in QI work in hospitals. The expectations span from systematic collection of patients’ and family members’ experiences for the purpose of improving service quality through establishing patient-oriented arenas for ongoing collaboration with staff to the support of individual involvement in decision making. However, the extent of involvement of patients and application of patient experiences in QI work was limited at both hospitals. Even though patient involvement was gaining prominence at the meso level − and to a lesser extent at the micro level − relevant tools for measuring and using patient experiences in QI work were lacking, and available measures of patient experience were not being used meaningfully or systematically. CONCLUSIONS: The relative lack of expertise in Norwegian hospitals of adapting and implementing tools and methods for improving patient involvement and patient experiences at the meso and micro levels mark a need for health care policymakers and hospital leaders to learn from experiences of other industries and countries that have successfully integrated user experiences into QI work. Hospital managers need to design and implement wider strategies to help their staff members recognize and value the contribution that patient involvement and patient experiences can make to the improvement of healthcare quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3680039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36800392013-06-13 Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality? Wiig, Siri Storm, Marianne Aase, Karina Gjestsen, Martha Therese Solheim, Marit Harthug, Stig Robert, Glenn Fulop, Naomi BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient involvement in health care decision making is part of a wider trend towards a more bottom-up approach to service planning and provision, and patient experience is increasingly conceptualized as a core dimension of health care quality. The aim of this multi-level study is two-fold: 1) to describe and analyze how governmental organizations expect acute hospitals to incorporate patient involvement and patient experiences into their quality improvement (QI) efforts and 2) to analyze how patient involvement and patient experiences are used by hospitals to try to improve the quality of care they provide. METHODS: This multi-level case study combines analysis of national policy documents and regulations at the macro level with semi-structured interviews and non-participant observation of key meetings and shadowing of staff at the meso and micro levels in two purposively sampled Norwegian hospitals. Fieldwork at the meso and micro levels was undertaken over a 12-month period (2011–2012). RESULTS: Governmental documents and regulations at the macro level demonstrated wide-ranging expectations for the integration of patient involvement and patient experiences in QI work in hospitals. The expectations span from systematic collection of patients’ and family members’ experiences for the purpose of improving service quality through establishing patient-oriented arenas for ongoing collaboration with staff to the support of individual involvement in decision making. However, the extent of involvement of patients and application of patient experiences in QI work was limited at both hospitals. Even though patient involvement was gaining prominence at the meso level − and to a lesser extent at the micro level − relevant tools for measuring and using patient experiences in QI work were lacking, and available measures of patient experience were not being used meaningfully or systematically. CONCLUSIONS: The relative lack of expertise in Norwegian hospitals of adapting and implementing tools and methods for improving patient involvement and patient experiences at the meso and micro levels mark a need for health care policymakers and hospital leaders to learn from experiences of other industries and countries that have successfully integrated user experiences into QI work. Hospital managers need to design and implement wider strategies to help their staff members recognize and value the contribution that patient involvement and patient experiences can make to the improvement of healthcare quality. BioMed Central 2013-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3680039/ /pubmed/23742265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-206 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wiig et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wiig, Siri
Storm, Marianne
Aase, Karina
Gjestsen, Martha Therese
Solheim, Marit
Harthug, Stig
Robert, Glenn
Fulop, Naomi
Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
title Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
title_full Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
title_fullStr Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
title_short Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
title_sort investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in norway: rhetoric or reality?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23742265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-206
work_keys_str_mv AT wiigsiri investigatingtheuseofpatientinvolvementandpatientexperienceinqualityimprovementinnorwayrhetoricorreality
AT stormmarianne investigatingtheuseofpatientinvolvementandpatientexperienceinqualityimprovementinnorwayrhetoricorreality
AT aasekarina investigatingtheuseofpatientinvolvementandpatientexperienceinqualityimprovementinnorwayrhetoricorreality
AT gjestsenmarthatherese investigatingtheuseofpatientinvolvementandpatientexperienceinqualityimprovementinnorwayrhetoricorreality
AT solheimmarit investigatingtheuseofpatientinvolvementandpatientexperienceinqualityimprovementinnorwayrhetoricorreality
AT harthugstig investigatingtheuseofpatientinvolvementandpatientexperienceinqualityimprovementinnorwayrhetoricorreality
AT robertglenn investigatingtheuseofpatientinvolvementandpatientexperienceinqualityimprovementinnorwayrhetoricorreality
AT fulopnaomi investigatingtheuseofpatientinvolvementandpatientexperienceinqualityimprovementinnorwayrhetoricorreality