Cargando…

Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)

BACKGROUND: Teaching the steps of evidence-based medicine (EBM) to undergraduate as well as postgraduate health care professionals is crucial for implementation of effective, beneficial health care practices and abandonment of ineffective, harmful ones. Stellenbosch University in Cape Town, South Af...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rohwer, Anke, Young, Taryn, van Schalkwyk, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23710548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-77
_version_ 1782273076229046272
author Rohwer, Anke
Young, Taryn
van Schalkwyk, Susan
author_facet Rohwer, Anke
Young, Taryn
van Schalkwyk, Susan
author_sort Rohwer, Anke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Teaching the steps of evidence-based medicine (EBM) to undergraduate as well as postgraduate health care professionals is crucial for implementation of effective, beneficial health care practices and abandonment of ineffective, harmful ones. Stellenbosch University in Cape Town, South Africa, offers a 12-week, completely online module on EBM within the Family Medicine division, to medical specialists in their first year of training. The aim of this study was to formatively evaluate this module; assessing both the mode of delivery; as well as the perceived effectiveness and usefulness thereof. METHODS: We used mixed methods to evaluate this module: A document review to assess whether the content of the module reflects important EBM competencies; a survey of the students to determine their experiences of the module; and semi-structured interviews with the tutors to explore their perspectives of the module. Ethics approval was obtained. RESULTS: The document review indicated that EBM competencies were covered adequately, although critical appraisal only focused on randomised controlled trials and guidelines. Students had a positive attitude towards the module, but felt that they needed more support from the tutors. Tutors felt that students engaged actively in discussions, but experienced difficulties with understanding certain concepts of EBM. Furthermore, they felt that it was challenging explaining these via the online learning platform and saw the need to incorporate more advanced technology to better connect with the students. In their view the key to successful learning of EBM was to keep it relevant and applicable to everyday practice. Tutors also felt that an online module on EBM was advantageous, since doctors from all over the world were able to participate. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that the online module on EBM was effective in increasing EBM knowledge and skills of postgraduate students and was well received by both students and tutors. Students and tutors experienced generic challenges that accompany any educational intervention of EBM (e.g. understanding difficult concepts), but in addition had to deal with challenges unique to the online learning environment. Teachers of EBM should acknowledge these so as to enhance and successfully implement EBM teaching and learning for all students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3680144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36801442013-06-13 Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM) Rohwer, Anke Young, Taryn van Schalkwyk, Susan BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Teaching the steps of evidence-based medicine (EBM) to undergraduate as well as postgraduate health care professionals is crucial for implementation of effective, beneficial health care practices and abandonment of ineffective, harmful ones. Stellenbosch University in Cape Town, South Africa, offers a 12-week, completely online module on EBM within the Family Medicine division, to medical specialists in their first year of training. The aim of this study was to formatively evaluate this module; assessing both the mode of delivery; as well as the perceived effectiveness and usefulness thereof. METHODS: We used mixed methods to evaluate this module: A document review to assess whether the content of the module reflects important EBM competencies; a survey of the students to determine their experiences of the module; and semi-structured interviews with the tutors to explore their perspectives of the module. Ethics approval was obtained. RESULTS: The document review indicated that EBM competencies were covered adequately, although critical appraisal only focused on randomised controlled trials and guidelines. Students had a positive attitude towards the module, but felt that they needed more support from the tutors. Tutors felt that students engaged actively in discussions, but experienced difficulties with understanding certain concepts of EBM. Furthermore, they felt that it was challenging explaining these via the online learning platform and saw the need to incorporate more advanced technology to better connect with the students. In their view the key to successful learning of EBM was to keep it relevant and applicable to everyday practice. Tutors also felt that an online module on EBM was advantageous, since doctors from all over the world were able to participate. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that the online module on EBM was effective in increasing EBM knowledge and skills of postgraduate students and was well received by both students and tutors. Students and tutors experienced generic challenges that accompany any educational intervention of EBM (e.g. understanding difficult concepts), but in addition had to deal with challenges unique to the online learning environment. Teachers of EBM should acknowledge these so as to enhance and successfully implement EBM teaching and learning for all students. BioMed Central 2013-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3680144/ /pubmed/23710548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-77 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rohwer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rohwer, Anke
Young, Taryn
van Schalkwyk, Susan
Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)
title Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)
title_full Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)
title_fullStr Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)
title_full_unstemmed Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)
title_short Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)
title_sort effective or just practical? an evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (ebm)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23710548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-77
work_keys_str_mv AT rohweranke effectiveorjustpracticalanevaluationofanonlinepostgraduatemoduleonevidencebasedmedicineebm
AT youngtaryn effectiveorjustpracticalanevaluationofanonlinepostgraduatemoduleonevidencebasedmedicineebm
AT vanschalkwyksusan effectiveorjustpracticalanevaluationofanonlinepostgraduatemoduleonevidencebasedmedicineebm