Cargando…

Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Poverty undermines adherence to tuberculosis treatment. Economic support may both encourage and enable patients to complete treatment. In South Africa, which carries a high burden of tuberculosis, such support may improve the currently poor outcomes of patients on tuberculosis treatment....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutge, Elizabeth, Lewin, Simon, Volmink, Jimmy, Friedman, Irwin, Lombard, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23714270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-154
_version_ 1782273086800789504
author Lutge, Elizabeth
Lewin, Simon
Volmink, Jimmy
Friedman, Irwin
Lombard, Carl
author_facet Lutge, Elizabeth
Lewin, Simon
Volmink, Jimmy
Friedman, Irwin
Lombard, Carl
author_sort Lutge, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poverty undermines adherence to tuberculosis treatment. Economic support may both encourage and enable patients to complete treatment. In South Africa, which carries a high burden of tuberculosis, such support may improve the currently poor outcomes of patients on tuberculosis treatment. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and effectiveness of delivering economic support to patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in a high-burden province of South Africa. METHODS: This was a pragmatic, unblinded, two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, where 20 public sector clinics acted as clusters. Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in intervention clinics (n = 2,107) were offered a monthly voucher of ZAR120.00 (approximately US$15) until the completion of their treatment. Vouchers were redeemed at local shops for foodstuffs. Patients in control clinics (n = 1,984) received usual tuberculosis care. RESULTS: Intention to treat analysis showed a small but non-significant improvement in treatment success rates in intervention clinics (intervention 76.2%; control 70.7%; risk difference 5.6% (95% confidence interval: -1.2%, 12.3%), P = 0.107). Low fidelity to the intervention meant that 36.2% of eligible patients did not receive a voucher at all, 32.3% received a voucher for between one and three months and 31.5% received a voucher for four to eight months of treatment. There was a strong dose–response relationship between frequency of receipt of the voucher and treatment success (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our pragmatic trial has shown that, in the real world setting of public sector clinics in South Africa, economic support to patients with tuberculosis does not significantly improve outcomes on treatment. However, the low fidelity to the delivery of our voucher meant that a third of eligible patients did not receive it. Among patients in intervention clinics who received the voucher at least once, treatment success rates were significantly improved. Further operational research is needed to explore how best to ensure the consistent and appropriate delivery of such support to those eligible to receive it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50689131
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3680200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36802002013-06-13 Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial Lutge, Elizabeth Lewin, Simon Volmink, Jimmy Friedman, Irwin Lombard, Carl Trials Research BACKGROUND: Poverty undermines adherence to tuberculosis treatment. Economic support may both encourage and enable patients to complete treatment. In South Africa, which carries a high burden of tuberculosis, such support may improve the currently poor outcomes of patients on tuberculosis treatment. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and effectiveness of delivering economic support to patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in a high-burden province of South Africa. METHODS: This was a pragmatic, unblinded, two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, where 20 public sector clinics acted as clusters. Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in intervention clinics (n = 2,107) were offered a monthly voucher of ZAR120.00 (approximately US$15) until the completion of their treatment. Vouchers were redeemed at local shops for foodstuffs. Patients in control clinics (n = 1,984) received usual tuberculosis care. RESULTS: Intention to treat analysis showed a small but non-significant improvement in treatment success rates in intervention clinics (intervention 76.2%; control 70.7%; risk difference 5.6% (95% confidence interval: -1.2%, 12.3%), P = 0.107). Low fidelity to the intervention meant that 36.2% of eligible patients did not receive a voucher at all, 32.3% received a voucher for between one and three months and 31.5% received a voucher for four to eight months of treatment. There was a strong dose–response relationship between frequency of receipt of the voucher and treatment success (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our pragmatic trial has shown that, in the real world setting of public sector clinics in South Africa, economic support to patients with tuberculosis does not significantly improve outcomes on treatment. However, the low fidelity to the delivery of our voucher meant that a third of eligible patients did not receive it. Among patients in intervention clinics who received the voucher at least once, treatment success rates were significantly improved. Further operational research is needed to explore how best to ensure the consistent and appropriate delivery of such support to those eligible to receive it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50689131 BioMed Central 2013-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3680200/ /pubmed/23714270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-154 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lutge et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lutge, Elizabeth
Lewin, Simon
Volmink, Jimmy
Friedman, Irwin
Lombard, Carl
Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial
title Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_full Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_short Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_sort economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in south africa: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23714270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-154
work_keys_str_mv AT lutgeelizabeth economicsupporttoimprovetuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinsouthafricaapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lewinsimon economicsupporttoimprovetuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinsouthafricaapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT volminkjimmy economicsupporttoimprovetuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinsouthafricaapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT friedmanirwin economicsupporttoimprovetuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinsouthafricaapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lombardcarl economicsupporttoimprovetuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinsouthafricaapragmaticclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial