Cargando…

The Impact of Domestication on the Chicken Optical Apparatus

Domestication processes tend to release animals from natural selection and favour traits desired by humans, such as food-production and co-operative behaviour. A side effect of such selective breeding is the alteration of unintended traits. In this paper, we investigate how active selection for egg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roth, Lina S.V., Lind, Olle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065509
_version_ 1782273122891726848
author Roth, Lina S.V.
Lind, Olle
author_facet Roth, Lina S.V.
Lind, Olle
author_sort Roth, Lina S.V.
collection PubMed
description Domestication processes tend to release animals from natural selection and favour traits desired by humans, such as food-production and co-operative behaviour. A side effect of such selective breeding is the alteration of unintended traits. In this paper, we investigate how active selection for egg production in chickens has affected the visual system, in particular the optical sensitivity that relates to the ability of chickens to see in dim light. We measured eye dimensions as well as the pupil diameter at different light intensities (the steady state pupil dynamics), in adult male and female White Leghorns and the closest relatives to their ancestor, the Red Junglefowls. With this information, we calculated the focal length and optical sensitivity (f-number) of the eyes. Males have larger eyes than females in both breeds and White Leghorn eyes are larger than those of Red Junglefowls in both sexes. The steady state pupil dynamics is less variable, however, the combination of pupil dynamics and eye size gives a higher optical sensitivity in Red Junglefowl eyes than in White Leghorns at light intensities below approximately 10 cd/m(2). While eye size and focal length match the larger body size in White Leghorns compared to Red Junglefowls, the steady state pupil dynamics do not. The reason for this is likely to be that eye morphology and the neuro-muscular control of the pupil have been affected differently by the strong selection for egg production and the simultaneous release of the selection pressure for high performing vision. This study is the first description of how optical sensitivity has changed in a domesticated species and our results demonstrate important considerations regarding domestication processes and sensory ability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3680433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36804332013-06-17 The Impact of Domestication on the Chicken Optical Apparatus Roth, Lina S.V. Lind, Olle PLoS One Research Article Domestication processes tend to release animals from natural selection and favour traits desired by humans, such as food-production and co-operative behaviour. A side effect of such selective breeding is the alteration of unintended traits. In this paper, we investigate how active selection for egg production in chickens has affected the visual system, in particular the optical sensitivity that relates to the ability of chickens to see in dim light. We measured eye dimensions as well as the pupil diameter at different light intensities (the steady state pupil dynamics), in adult male and female White Leghorns and the closest relatives to their ancestor, the Red Junglefowls. With this information, we calculated the focal length and optical sensitivity (f-number) of the eyes. Males have larger eyes than females in both breeds and White Leghorn eyes are larger than those of Red Junglefowls in both sexes. The steady state pupil dynamics is less variable, however, the combination of pupil dynamics and eye size gives a higher optical sensitivity in Red Junglefowl eyes than in White Leghorns at light intensities below approximately 10 cd/m(2). While eye size and focal length match the larger body size in White Leghorns compared to Red Junglefowls, the steady state pupil dynamics do not. The reason for this is likely to be that eye morphology and the neuro-muscular control of the pupil have been affected differently by the strong selection for egg production and the simultaneous release of the selection pressure for high performing vision. This study is the first description of how optical sensitivity has changed in a domesticated species and our results demonstrate important considerations regarding domestication processes and sensory ability. Public Library of Science 2013-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3680433/ /pubmed/23776492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065509 Text en © 2013 Roth, Lind http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roth, Lina S.V.
Lind, Olle
The Impact of Domestication on the Chicken Optical Apparatus
title The Impact of Domestication on the Chicken Optical Apparatus
title_full The Impact of Domestication on the Chicken Optical Apparatus
title_fullStr The Impact of Domestication on the Chicken Optical Apparatus
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Domestication on the Chicken Optical Apparatus
title_short The Impact of Domestication on the Chicken Optical Apparatus
title_sort impact of domestication on the chicken optical apparatus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23776492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065509
work_keys_str_mv AT rothlinasv theimpactofdomesticationonthechickenopticalapparatus
AT lindolle theimpactofdomesticationonthechickenopticalapparatus
AT rothlinasv impactofdomesticationonthechickenopticalapparatus
AT lindolle impactofdomesticationonthechickenopticalapparatus