Cargando…
Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination
Mass Drug Administration (MDA) for Lymphatic Filariasis (LF) elimination has been implemented worldwide and in India with a goal of eliminating the disease by 2020 and 2015 respectively. Compliance to MDA is less than adequate to achieve the goal in the desired time. This study aims to identify the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23767017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.105175 |
_version_ | 1782273168080109568 |
---|---|
author | Nujum, Zinia T Remadevi, S Nirmala, C Rajmohanan, K Indu, PS Nair, S Muraleedharan |
author_facet | Nujum, Zinia T Remadevi, S Nirmala, C Rajmohanan, K Indu, PS Nair, S Muraleedharan |
author_sort | Nujum, Zinia T |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mass Drug Administration (MDA) for Lymphatic Filariasis (LF) elimination has been implemented worldwide and in India with a goal of eliminating the disease by 2020 and 2015 respectively. Compliance to MDA is less than adequate to achieve the goal in the desired time. This study aims to identify the factors related to awareness, acceptability and attitude and the role of certain theoretical constructs of health belief model in determining the compliant behavior to MDA. Within a cross-sectional study done in Thiruvananthapuram district of Kerala, India, undertaken to determine coverage, a comparison was done between compliant and noncompliant individuals. 300 households were selected using cluster sampling technique, for estimation of coverage of MDA. From these households, 99 noncompliant and 70 compliant individuals were selected as cases and controls. The independent factors determining noncompliance were client attitude of not perceiving the need with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.52 (1.29-4.92), an unfavorable provider attitude with an adjusted OR of 2.14 (1.05-4.35) and low drug administrator acceptability with an adjusted OR of 2.01 (1.01-3.99). In MDA, the person giving the drug to the beneficiary is the most important person, whose attitude and acceptability determines compliance. More rigorous selection and training for capacity building of drug administrators are essential to enhance the compliance level. Alternate drug delivery strategies, besides house to house campaign by voluntary drug administers also needs to be implemented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3680877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36808772013-06-13 Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination Nujum, Zinia T Remadevi, S Nirmala, C Rajmohanan, K Indu, PS Nair, S Muraleedharan Trop Parasitol Original Article Mass Drug Administration (MDA) for Lymphatic Filariasis (LF) elimination has been implemented worldwide and in India with a goal of eliminating the disease by 2020 and 2015 respectively. Compliance to MDA is less than adequate to achieve the goal in the desired time. This study aims to identify the factors related to awareness, acceptability and attitude and the role of certain theoretical constructs of health belief model in determining the compliant behavior to MDA. Within a cross-sectional study done in Thiruvananthapuram district of Kerala, India, undertaken to determine coverage, a comparison was done between compliant and noncompliant individuals. 300 households were selected using cluster sampling technique, for estimation of coverage of MDA. From these households, 99 noncompliant and 70 compliant individuals were selected as cases and controls. The independent factors determining noncompliance were client attitude of not perceiving the need with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.52 (1.29-4.92), an unfavorable provider attitude with an adjusted OR of 2.14 (1.05-4.35) and low drug administrator acceptability with an adjusted OR of 2.01 (1.01-3.99). In MDA, the person giving the drug to the beneficiary is the most important person, whose attitude and acceptability determines compliance. More rigorous selection and training for capacity building of drug administrators are essential to enhance the compliance level. Alternate drug delivery strategies, besides house to house campaign by voluntary drug administers also needs to be implemented. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3680877/ /pubmed/23767017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.105175 Text en Copyright: © Tropical Parasitology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nujum, Zinia T Remadevi, S Nirmala, C Rajmohanan, K Indu, PS Nair, S Muraleedharan Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination |
title | Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination |
title_full | Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination |
title_fullStr | Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination |
title_short | Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination |
title_sort | factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23767017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.105175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nujumziniat factorsdeterminingnoncompliancetomassdrugadministrationforlymphaticfilariasiselimination AT remadevis factorsdeterminingnoncompliancetomassdrugadministrationforlymphaticfilariasiselimination AT nirmalac factorsdeterminingnoncompliancetomassdrugadministrationforlymphaticfilariasiselimination AT rajmohanank factorsdeterminingnoncompliancetomassdrugadministrationforlymphaticfilariasiselimination AT indups factorsdeterminingnoncompliancetomassdrugadministrationforlymphaticfilariasiselimination AT nairsmuraleedharan factorsdeterminingnoncompliancetomassdrugadministrationforlymphaticfilariasiselimination |