Cargando…
Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
It is heavily debated whether or not treatment with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 contributes to the development of acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Muller and colleagues report no association between initial resuscitation with hydroxyethyl s...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22405319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11200 |
_version_ | 1782273246066900992 |
---|---|
author | Haase, Nicolai Perner, Anders |
author_facet | Haase, Nicolai Perner, Anders |
author_sort | Haase, Nicolai |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is heavily debated whether or not treatment with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 contributes to the development of acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Muller and colleagues report no association between initial resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and renal impairment in a cohort of septic patients. Can we then consider hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 a safe intervention? The answer is no - observational data should be interpreted with caution and should mainly be used to identify risks, while safety must be assessed in randomised clinical trials. With these factors in mind, Muller's data associate the use of vasopressors with poor outcome, underlining the need for further randomised clinical trials to assess the potential harmful effects of common interventions in the critically ill. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3681340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36813402013-06-25 Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? Haase, Nicolai Perner, Anders Crit Care Commentary It is heavily debated whether or not treatment with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 contributes to the development of acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Muller and colleagues report no association between initial resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and renal impairment in a cohort of septic patients. Can we then consider hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 a safe intervention? The answer is no - observational data should be interpreted with caution and should mainly be used to identify risks, while safety must be assessed in randomised clinical trials. With these factors in mind, Muller's data associate the use of vasopressors with poor outcome, underlining the need for further randomised clinical trials to assess the potential harmful effects of common interventions in the critically ill. BioMed Central 2012 2012-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3681340/ /pubmed/22405319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11200 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Haase, Nicolai Perner, Anders Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? |
title | Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? |
title_full | Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? |
title_fullStr | Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? |
title_short | Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? |
title_sort | is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22405319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haasenicolai ishydroxyethylstarch13004safe AT perneranders ishydroxyethylstarch13004safe |