Cargando…

Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?

It is heavily debated whether or not treatment with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 contributes to the development of acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Muller and colleagues report no association between initial resuscitation with hydroxyethyl s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haase, Nicolai, Perner, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22405319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11200
_version_ 1782273246066900992
author Haase, Nicolai
Perner, Anders
author_facet Haase, Nicolai
Perner, Anders
author_sort Haase, Nicolai
collection PubMed
description It is heavily debated whether or not treatment with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 contributes to the development of acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Muller and colleagues report no association between initial resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and renal impairment in a cohort of septic patients. Can we then consider hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 a safe intervention? The answer is no - observational data should be interpreted with caution and should mainly be used to identify risks, while safety must be assessed in randomised clinical trials. With these factors in mind, Muller's data associate the use of vasopressors with poor outcome, underlining the need for further randomised clinical trials to assess the potential harmful effects of common interventions in the critically ill.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3681340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36813402013-06-25 Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe? Haase, Nicolai Perner, Anders Crit Care Commentary It is heavily debated whether or not treatment with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 contributes to the development of acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Muller and colleagues report no association between initial resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and renal impairment in a cohort of septic patients. Can we then consider hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 a safe intervention? The answer is no - observational data should be interpreted with caution and should mainly be used to identify risks, while safety must be assessed in randomised clinical trials. With these factors in mind, Muller's data associate the use of vasopressors with poor outcome, underlining the need for further randomised clinical trials to assess the potential harmful effects of common interventions in the critically ill. BioMed Central 2012 2012-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3681340/ /pubmed/22405319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11200 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Haase, Nicolai
Perner, Anders
Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
title Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
title_full Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
title_fullStr Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
title_full_unstemmed Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
title_short Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
title_sort is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22405319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11200
work_keys_str_mv AT haasenicolai ishydroxyethylstarch13004safe
AT perneranders ishydroxyethylstarch13004safe