Cargando…
Intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic hypothermia is largely used to protect the brain following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (CA), but it is unclear whether we should start therapeutic hypothermia earlier, that is, before ROSC. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22397519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11235 |
_version_ | 1782273251690414080 |
---|---|
author | Scolletta, Sabino Taccone, Fabio Silvio Nordberg, Per Donadello, Katia Vincent, Jean-Louis Castren, Maaret |
author_facet | Scolletta, Sabino Taccone, Fabio Silvio Nordberg, Per Donadello, Katia Vincent, Jean-Louis Castren, Maaret |
author_sort | Scolletta, Sabino |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic hypothermia is largely used to protect the brain following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (CA), but it is unclear whether we should start therapeutic hypothermia earlier, that is, before ROSC. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and Ovid/Medline databases using "arrest" OR "cardiac arrest" OR "heart arrest" AND "hypothermia" OR "therapeutic hypothermia" OR "cooling" as keywords. Only studies using intra-arrest therapeutic hypothermia (IATH) were selected for this review. Three authors independently assessed the validity of included studies and extracted data regarding characteristics of the studied cohort (animal or human) and the main outcomes related to the use of IATH: Mortality, neurological status and cardiac function (particularly, rate of ROSC). RESULTS: A total of 23 animal studies (level of evidence (LOE) 5) and five human studies, including one randomized controlled trial (LOE 1), one retrospective and one prospective controlled study (LOE 3), and two prospective studies without a control group (LOE 4), were identified. IATH improved survival and neurological outcomes when compared to normothermia and/or hypothermia after ROSC. IATH was also associated with improved ROSC rates and with improved cardiac function, including better left ventricular function, and reduced myocardial infarct size, when compared to normothermia. CONCLUSIONS: IATH improves survival and neurological outcome when compared to normothermia and/or conventional hypothermia in experimental models of CA. Clinical data on the efficacy of IATH remain limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3681365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36813652013-06-25 Intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review Scolletta, Sabino Taccone, Fabio Silvio Nordberg, Per Donadello, Katia Vincent, Jean-Louis Castren, Maaret Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic hypothermia is largely used to protect the brain following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (CA), but it is unclear whether we should start therapeutic hypothermia earlier, that is, before ROSC. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and Ovid/Medline databases using "arrest" OR "cardiac arrest" OR "heart arrest" AND "hypothermia" OR "therapeutic hypothermia" OR "cooling" as keywords. Only studies using intra-arrest therapeutic hypothermia (IATH) were selected for this review. Three authors independently assessed the validity of included studies and extracted data regarding characteristics of the studied cohort (animal or human) and the main outcomes related to the use of IATH: Mortality, neurological status and cardiac function (particularly, rate of ROSC). RESULTS: A total of 23 animal studies (level of evidence (LOE) 5) and five human studies, including one randomized controlled trial (LOE 1), one retrospective and one prospective controlled study (LOE 3), and two prospective studies without a control group (LOE 4), were identified. IATH improved survival and neurological outcomes when compared to normothermia and/or hypothermia after ROSC. IATH was also associated with improved ROSC rates and with improved cardiac function, including better left ventricular function, and reduced myocardial infarct size, when compared to normothermia. CONCLUSIONS: IATH improves survival and neurological outcome when compared to normothermia and/or conventional hypothermia in experimental models of CA. Clinical data on the efficacy of IATH remain limited. BioMed Central 2012 2012-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3681365/ /pubmed/22397519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11235 Text en Copyright ©2012 Scolletta et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Scolletta, Sabino Taccone, Fabio Silvio Nordberg, Per Donadello, Katia Vincent, Jean-Louis Castren, Maaret Intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review |
title | Intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review |
title_full | Intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review |
title_short | Intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review |
title_sort | intra-arrest hypothermia during cardiac arrest: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22397519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scollettasabino intraarresthypothermiaduringcardiacarrestasystematicreview AT tacconefabiosilvio intraarresthypothermiaduringcardiacarrestasystematicreview AT nordbergper intraarresthypothermiaduringcardiacarrestasystematicreview AT donadellokatia intraarresthypothermiaduringcardiacarrestasystematicreview AT vincentjeanlouis intraarresthypothermiaduringcardiacarrestasystematicreview AT castrenmaaret intraarresthypothermiaduringcardiacarrestasystematicreview |