Cargando…

Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Chest x-rays (CXRs) are the most frequent radiological tests performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the utility of performing daily routine CXRs is unclear. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase (1948 to March 2011) for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganapathy, Anusoumya, Adhikari, Neill KJ, Spiegelman, Jamie, Scales, Damon C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22541022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11321
_version_ 1782273259211849728
author Ganapathy, Anusoumya
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Spiegelman, Jamie
Scales, Damon C
author_facet Ganapathy, Anusoumya
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Spiegelman, Jamie
Scales, Damon C
author_sort Ganapathy, Anusoumya
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chest x-rays (CXRs) are the most frequent radiological tests performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the utility of performing daily routine CXRs is unclear. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase (1948 to March 2011) for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and before-after observational studies comparing a strategy of routine CXRs to a more restrictive approach with CXRs performed to investigate clinical changes among critically ill adults or children. In duplicate, we extracted data on the CXR strategy, study quality and clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital stay). RESULTS: Nine studies (39,358 CXRs; 9,611 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Three trials (N = 870) of moderate to good quality provided information on the safety of a restrictive routine CXR strategy; only one trial systematically assessed for missed findings. Pooled data from trials showed no evidence of effect of a restrictive approach on ICU mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 1.28, P = 0.72; two trials, N = 776), hospital mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.41, P = 0.91; two trials, N = 259), ICU length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.86 days, 95% CI -2.38 to 0.66 days, P = 0.27; three trials, N = 870), hospital length of stay (WMD -2.50 days, 95% CI -6.62 to 1.61 days, P = 0.23; two trials, N = 259), or duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD -0.30 days, 95% CI -1.48 to 0.89 days, P = 0.62; three trials, N = 705). Adding data from six observational studies, one of which systematically screened for missed findings, gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis did not detect any harm associated with a restrictive chest radiograph strategy. However, confidence intervals were wide and harm was not rigorously assessed. Therefore, the safety of abandoning routine CXRs in patients admitted to the ICU remains uncertain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3681397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36813972013-06-25 Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ganapathy, Anusoumya Adhikari, Neill KJ Spiegelman, Jamie Scales, Damon C Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Chest x-rays (CXRs) are the most frequent radiological tests performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the utility of performing daily routine CXRs is unclear. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase (1948 to March 2011) for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and before-after observational studies comparing a strategy of routine CXRs to a more restrictive approach with CXRs performed to investigate clinical changes among critically ill adults or children. In duplicate, we extracted data on the CXR strategy, study quality and clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital stay). RESULTS: Nine studies (39,358 CXRs; 9,611 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Three trials (N = 870) of moderate to good quality provided information on the safety of a restrictive routine CXR strategy; only one trial systematically assessed for missed findings. Pooled data from trials showed no evidence of effect of a restrictive approach on ICU mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 1.28, P = 0.72; two trials, N = 776), hospital mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.41, P = 0.91; two trials, N = 259), ICU length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.86 days, 95% CI -2.38 to 0.66 days, P = 0.27; three trials, N = 870), hospital length of stay (WMD -2.50 days, 95% CI -6.62 to 1.61 days, P = 0.23; two trials, N = 259), or duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD -0.30 days, 95% CI -1.48 to 0.89 days, P = 0.62; three trials, N = 705). Adding data from six observational studies, one of which systematically screened for missed findings, gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis did not detect any harm associated with a restrictive chest radiograph strategy. However, confidence intervals were wide and harm was not rigorously assessed. Therefore, the safety of abandoning routine CXRs in patients admitted to the ICU remains uncertain. BioMed Central 2012 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3681397/ /pubmed/22541022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11321 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ganapathy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ganapathy, Anusoumya
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Spiegelman, Jamie
Scales, Damon C
Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22541022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11321
work_keys_str_mv AT ganapathyanusoumya routinechestxraysinintensivecareunitsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT adhikarineillkj routinechestxraysinintensivecareunitsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT spiegelmanjamie routinechestxraysinintensivecareunitsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scalesdamonc routinechestxraysinintensivecareunitsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis