Cargando…

Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation for chronic dialysis patients with contraindications to heparin administration is challenging. Current guidelines state that in patients with increased bleeding risks, strategies that can induce systemic anticoagulation should be avoided. Heparin-free dialysis using inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossignol, Patrick, Dorval, Marc, Fay, Renaud, Ros, Joan Fort, Loughraieb, Nathalie, Moureau, Frédérique, Laville, Maurice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-163
_version_ 1782273289100460032
author Rossignol, Patrick
Dorval, Marc
Fay, Renaud
Ros, Joan Fort
Loughraieb, Nathalie
Moureau, Frédérique
Laville, Maurice
author_facet Rossignol, Patrick
Dorval, Marc
Fay, Renaud
Ros, Joan Fort
Loughraieb, Nathalie
Moureau, Frédérique
Laville, Maurice
author_sort Rossignol, Patrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation for chronic dialysis patients with contraindications to heparin administration is challenging. Current guidelines state that in patients with increased bleeding risks, strategies that can induce systemic anticoagulation should be avoided. Heparin-free dialysis using intermittent saline flushes is widely adopted as the method of choice for patients at risk of bleeding, although on-line blood predilution may also be used. A new dialyzer, Evodial (Gambro, Lund, Sweden), is grafted with unfractionated heparin during the manufacturing process and may allow safe and efficient heparin-free hemodialysis sessions. In the present trial, Evodial was compared to standard care with either saline flushes or blood predilution. METHODS: The HepZero study is the first international (seven countries), multicenter (10 centers), randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority (and if applicable subsequently, superiority) trial with two parallel groups, comprising 252 end-stage renal disease patients treated by maintenance hemodialysis for at least 3 months and requiring heparin-free dialysis treatments. Patients will be treated during a maximum of three heparin-free dialysis treatments with either saline flushes or blood predilution (control group), or Evodial. The first heparin-free dialysis treatment will be considered successful when there is: no complete occlusion of air traps or dialyzer rendering dialysis impossible; no additional saline flushes to prevent clotting; no change of dialyzer or blood lines because of clotting; and no premature termination (early rinse-back) because of clotting. The primary objectives of the study are to determine the effectiveness of the Evodial dialyzer, compared with standard care in terms of successful treatments during the first heparin-free dialysis. If the non-inferiority of Evodial is demonstrated then the superiority of Evodial over standard care will be tested. The HepZero study results may have major clinical implications for patient care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01318486
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3681640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36816402013-06-14 Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Rossignol, Patrick Dorval, Marc Fay, Renaud Ros, Joan Fort Loughraieb, Nathalie Moureau, Frédérique Laville, Maurice Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation for chronic dialysis patients with contraindications to heparin administration is challenging. Current guidelines state that in patients with increased bleeding risks, strategies that can induce systemic anticoagulation should be avoided. Heparin-free dialysis using intermittent saline flushes is widely adopted as the method of choice for patients at risk of bleeding, although on-line blood predilution may also be used. A new dialyzer, Evodial (Gambro, Lund, Sweden), is grafted with unfractionated heparin during the manufacturing process and may allow safe and efficient heparin-free hemodialysis sessions. In the present trial, Evodial was compared to standard care with either saline flushes or blood predilution. METHODS: The HepZero study is the first international (seven countries), multicenter (10 centers), randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority (and if applicable subsequently, superiority) trial with two parallel groups, comprising 252 end-stage renal disease patients treated by maintenance hemodialysis for at least 3 months and requiring heparin-free dialysis treatments. Patients will be treated during a maximum of three heparin-free dialysis treatments with either saline flushes or blood predilution (control group), or Evodial. The first heparin-free dialysis treatment will be considered successful when there is: no complete occlusion of air traps or dialyzer rendering dialysis impossible; no additional saline flushes to prevent clotting; no change of dialyzer or blood lines because of clotting; and no premature termination (early rinse-back) because of clotting. The primary objectives of the study are to determine the effectiveness of the Evodial dialyzer, compared with standard care in terms of successful treatments during the first heparin-free dialysis. If the non-inferiority of Evodial is demonstrated then the superiority of Evodial over standard care will be tested. The HepZero study results may have major clinical implications for patient care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01318486 BioMed Central 2013-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3681640/ /pubmed/23725299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-163 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rossignol et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rossignol, Patrick
Dorval, Marc
Fay, Renaud
Ros, Joan Fort
Loughraieb, Nathalie
Moureau, Frédérique
Laville, Maurice
Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort rationale and design of the hepzero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-163
work_keys_str_mv AT rossignolpatrick rationaleanddesignofthehepzerostudyaprospectivemulticenterinternationalopenrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudywithparallelgroupscomparingheparinfreedialysiswithheparincoateddialysismembraneevodialversusstandardcarestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dorvalmarc rationaleanddesignofthehepzerostudyaprospectivemulticenterinternationalopenrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudywithparallelgroupscomparingheparinfreedialysiswithheparincoateddialysismembraneevodialversusstandardcarestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fayrenaud rationaleanddesignofthehepzerostudyaprospectivemulticenterinternationalopenrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudywithparallelgroupscomparingheparinfreedialysiswithheparincoateddialysismembraneevodialversusstandardcarestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rosjoanfort rationaleanddesignofthehepzerostudyaprospectivemulticenterinternationalopenrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudywithparallelgroupscomparingheparinfreedialysiswithheparincoateddialysismembraneevodialversusstandardcarestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT loughraiebnathalie rationaleanddesignofthehepzerostudyaprospectivemulticenterinternationalopenrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudywithparallelgroupscomparingheparinfreedialysiswithheparincoateddialysismembraneevodialversusstandardcarestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moureaufrederique rationaleanddesignofthehepzerostudyaprospectivemulticenterinternationalopenrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudywithparallelgroupscomparingheparinfreedialysiswithheparincoateddialysismembraneevodialversusstandardcarestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lavillemaurice rationaleanddesignofthehepzerostudyaprospectivemulticenterinternationalopenrandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudywithparallelgroupscomparingheparinfreedialysiswithheparincoateddialysismembraneevodialversusstandardcarestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial