Cargando…

Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial

INTRODUCTION: This cluster randomised trial evaluated an intervention to decrease x-ray referrals and increase giving advice to stay active for people with acute low back pain (LBP) in general practice. METHODS: General practices were randomised to either access to a guideline for acute LBP (control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: French, Simon D., McKenzie, Joanne E., O'Connor, Denise A., Grimshaw, Jeremy M., Mortimer, Duncan, Francis, Jill J., Michie, Susan, Spike, Neil, Schattner, Peter, Kent, Peter, Buchbinder, Rachelle, Page, Matthew J., Green, Sally E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23785427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065471
_version_ 1782273331694665728
author French, Simon D.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
O'Connor, Denise A.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Mortimer, Duncan
Francis, Jill J.
Michie, Susan
Spike, Neil
Schattner, Peter
Kent, Peter
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Page, Matthew J.
Green, Sally E.
author_facet French, Simon D.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
O'Connor, Denise A.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Mortimer, Duncan
Francis, Jill J.
Michie, Susan
Spike, Neil
Schattner, Peter
Kent, Peter
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Page, Matthew J.
Green, Sally E.
author_sort French, Simon D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This cluster randomised trial evaluated an intervention to decrease x-ray referrals and increase giving advice to stay active for people with acute low back pain (LBP) in general practice. METHODS: General practices were randomised to either access to a guideline for acute LBP (control) or facilitated interactive workshops (intervention). We measured behavioural predictors (e.g. knowledge, attitudes and intentions) and fear avoidance beliefs. We were unable to recruit sufficient patients to measure our original primary outcomes so we introduced other outcomes measured at the general practitioner (GP) level: behavioural simulation (clinical decision about vignettes) and rates of x-ray and CT-scan (medical administrative data). All those not involved in the delivery of the intervention were blinded to allocation. RESULTS: 47 practices (53 GPs) were randomised to the control and 45 practices (59 GPs) to the intervention. The number of GPs available for analysis at 12 months varied by outcome due to missing confounder information; a minimum of 38 GPs were available from the intervention group, and a minimum of 40 GPs from the control group. For the behavioural constructs, although effect estimates were small, the intervention group GPs had greater intention of practising consistent with the guideline for the clinical behaviour of x-ray referral. For behavioural simulation, intervention group GPs were more likely to adhere to guideline recommendations about x-ray (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.01, 3.05) and more likely to give advice to stay active (OR 4.49, 95%CI 1.90 to 10.60). Imaging referral was not statistically significantly different between groups and the potential importance of effects was unclear; rate ratio 0.87 (95%CI 0.68, 1.10) for x-ray or CT-scan. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention led to small changes in GP intention to practice in a manner that is consistent with an evidence-based guideline, but it did not result in statistically significant changes in actual behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012606000098538
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3681882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36818822013-06-19 Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial French, Simon D. McKenzie, Joanne E. O'Connor, Denise A. Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Mortimer, Duncan Francis, Jill J. Michie, Susan Spike, Neil Schattner, Peter Kent, Peter Buchbinder, Rachelle Page, Matthew J. Green, Sally E. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: This cluster randomised trial evaluated an intervention to decrease x-ray referrals and increase giving advice to stay active for people with acute low back pain (LBP) in general practice. METHODS: General practices were randomised to either access to a guideline for acute LBP (control) or facilitated interactive workshops (intervention). We measured behavioural predictors (e.g. knowledge, attitudes and intentions) and fear avoidance beliefs. We were unable to recruit sufficient patients to measure our original primary outcomes so we introduced other outcomes measured at the general practitioner (GP) level: behavioural simulation (clinical decision about vignettes) and rates of x-ray and CT-scan (medical administrative data). All those not involved in the delivery of the intervention were blinded to allocation. RESULTS: 47 practices (53 GPs) were randomised to the control and 45 practices (59 GPs) to the intervention. The number of GPs available for analysis at 12 months varied by outcome due to missing confounder information; a minimum of 38 GPs were available from the intervention group, and a minimum of 40 GPs from the control group. For the behavioural constructs, although effect estimates were small, the intervention group GPs had greater intention of practising consistent with the guideline for the clinical behaviour of x-ray referral. For behavioural simulation, intervention group GPs were more likely to adhere to guideline recommendations about x-ray (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.01, 3.05) and more likely to give advice to stay active (OR 4.49, 95%CI 1.90 to 10.60). Imaging referral was not statistically significantly different between groups and the potential importance of effects was unclear; rate ratio 0.87 (95%CI 0.68, 1.10) for x-ray or CT-scan. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention led to small changes in GP intention to practice in a manner that is consistent with an evidence-based guideline, but it did not result in statistically significant changes in actual behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012606000098538 Public Library of Science 2013-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3681882/ /pubmed/23785427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065471 Text en © 2013 French et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
French, Simon D.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
O'Connor, Denise A.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Mortimer, Duncan
Francis, Jill J.
Michie, Susan
Spike, Neil
Schattner, Peter
Kent, Peter
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Page, Matthew J.
Green, Sally E.
Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial
title Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial
title_full Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial
title_short Evaluation of a Theory-Informed Implementation Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in General Medical Practice: The IMPLEMENT Cluster Randomised Trial
title_sort evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the implement cluster randomised trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23785427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065471
work_keys_str_mv AT frenchsimond evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT mckenziejoannee evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT oconnordenisea evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT grimshawjeremym evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT mortimerduncan evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT francisjillj evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT michiesusan evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT spikeneil evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT schattnerpeter evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kentpeter evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT buchbinderrachelle evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT pagematthewj evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT greensallye evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial